Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1094-1098, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
JA Land, JL Evers and VJ Goossens
Screening for tubal factor subfertility by means of Chlamydia antibody
testing (CAT) was introduced into the initial work-up of subfertile couples
several years ago. The results reported, however, are heterogeneous, and no
uniformity exists in cut-off levels of titres, or in definitions of tubal
factor subfertility. We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate
the implications of varying the definitions of tubal pathology and of
modifying the cut-off levels on the clinical impact of CAT in predicting
tubal factor subfertility. In 227 consecutive patients who attended our
fertility clinic, the Chlamydia IgG antibody titre was determined and
related to tuboperitoneal abnormalities at laparoscopy as a reference
standard. According to received operating characteristic (ROC) curve
analysis, a titre of 16 is the optimum cut-off level. Increasing the
cut-off level improves specificity and positive likelihood ratio (LR+), at
the expense of sensitivity and negative LR (LR-). Changing the definition
of tubal factor subfertility from unspecified tuboperitoneal abnormalities
into extensive adhesions and/or bilateral distal tubal occlusion improves
LR+, LR- and kappa significantly. We conclude that CAT is more accurate in
predicting severe distal tubal pathology than unspecified tuboperitoneal
abnormalities. Although from a statistical point of view a titre of 16 is
the optimum cut-off level, from a clinical point of view 32 or 64 may be
preferable, depending on the aim of screening and the inception cohort.
REVIEWS
How to use Chlamydia antibody testing in subfertility patients
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, The Netherlands.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.F.P.J. Coppus, B.C. Opmeer, S. Logan, F. van der Veen, S. Bhattacharya, and B.W.J. Mol The predictive value of medical history taking and Chlamydia IgG ELISA antibody testing (CAT) in the selection of subfertile women for diagnostic laparoscopy: a clinical prediction model approach Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1353 - 1358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. den Hartog, S.A. Morre, and J.A. Land Chlamydia trachomatis-associated tubal factor subfertility: immunogenetic aspects and serological screening Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 719 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tiitinen, H.-M. Surcel, M. Halttunen, S. Birkelund, A. Bloigu, G. Christiansen, P. Koskela, S.G. Morrison, R.P. Morrison, and J. Paavonen Chlamydia trachomatis and chlamydial heat shock protein 60-specific antibody and cell-mediated responses predict tubal factor infertility Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1533 - 1538. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.A.M. Perquin, P.J. Dorr, A.J.M. de Craen, and F.M. Helmerhorst Routine use of hysterosalpingography prior to laparoscopy in the fertility workup: a multicentre randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1227 - 1231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Higgins, S. Hemsley, and P. J. Canfield Association of Uterine and Salpingeal Fibrosis with Chlamydial Hsp60 and Hsp10 Antigen-Specific Antibodies in Chlamydia-Infected Koalas Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 2005; 12(5): 632 - 639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. den Hartog, J.A. Land, F.R.M. Stassen, A.G.H. Kessels, and C.A. Bruggeman Serological markers of persistent C. trachomatis infections in women with tubal factor subfertility Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 986 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.A. Land, G. Voss, A.G.H. Kessels, and J.L. Severens Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydia antibody tests in subfertile women Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 425 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.E. den Hartog, J.A. Land, F.R.M. Stassen, M.E.P. Slobbe-van Drunen, A.G.H. Kessels, and C.A. Bruggeman The role of chlamydia genus-specific and species-specific IgG antibody testing in predicting tubal disease in subfertile women Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1380 - 1384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Land, A.P. Gijsen, A.G.H. Kessels, M.E.P. Slobbe, and C.A. Bruggeman Performance of five serological chlamydia antibody tests in subfertile women Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2621 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Murillo, J. A. Land, J. Pleijster, C. A. Bruggeman, A. S. Pena, and S. A. Morre Interleukin-1B (IL-1B) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1RN) gene polymorphisms are not associated with tubal pathology and Chlamydia trachomatis-related tubal factor subfertility Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2309 - 2314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Logan, R. Gazvani, H. McKenzie, A. Templeton, and S. Bhattacharya Can history, ultrasound, or ELISA chlamydial antibodies, alone or in combination, predict tubal factor infertility in subfertile women? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2350 - 2356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Akande, L. P. Hunt, D. J. Cahill, E.O. Caul, W.C. L. Ford, and J. M. Jenkins Tubal damage in infertile women: prediction using chlamydia serology Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1841 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Gijsen, J. A. Land, V. J. Goossens, M. E.P. Slobbe, and C. A. Bruggeman Chlamydia antibody testing in screening for tubal factor subfertility: the significance of IgG antibody decline over time Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 699 - 703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Shibahara, H. Fujiwara, Y. Hirano, T. Suzuki, H. Obara, S. Takamizawa, S. Idei, and I. Sato Usefulness of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in investigating infertile women with Chlamydia trachomatis infection Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2001; 16(8): 1690 - 1693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Yu Ng, O. S. Tang, and P. C. Ho Measurement of serum CA-125 concentrations does not improve the value of Chlamydia trachomatis antibody in predicting tubal pathology at laparoscopy Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 775 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Gijsen, J. A. Land, V. J. Goossens, P. Leffers, C. A. Bruggeman, and J. L.H. Evers Chlamydia pneumoniae and screening for tubal factor subfertility Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 487 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Thomas, L. Coughlin, P.T. Mannion, and N.G. Haddad The value of Chlamydia trachomatis antibody testing as part of routine infertility investigations Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1079 - 1082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W.J. Mol, J. A. Collins, E. A. Burrows, F. van der Veen, and P. M.M. Bossuyt Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1237 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W.J. Mol, F. van der Veen, P. M.M. Bossuyt, J. A. Land, J. L.H. Evers, and V. J. Goossens Chlamydia antibody titres Hum. Reprod., January 1, 1999; 14(1): 268 - 269. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


