Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Elst, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Elst, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1595-1599, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Ultra-rapid freezing of mouse oocytes lowers the cell number in the inner cell mass of 5 day old in-vitro cultured blastocysts

J Van der Elst, Y Amerijckx and A Van Steirteghem
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Brussels Free University Hospital, Belgium.

We demonstrated previously that ultra-rapid freezing of mouse oocytes with 3.5 M dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) decreased cell numbers in day 5 in- vitro cultured blastocysts. In the present study we counted cell numbers of trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) separately following differential labelling of TE with propidium iodide (red) and ICM with bisbenzimide (blue). Blastocysts were from four groups of oocytes: (i) cumulus-enclosed; (ii) hyaluronidase-treated cumulus-free; (iii) cumulus-free and exposed to 3.5 M DMSO; and (iv) cumulus-free and ultrarapidly frozen with 3.5 M DMSO. Mean (+/-SD) blastocyst cell numbers were 54.7 +/- 22.0, 51.1 +/- 17.3, 52.3 +/- 13.1 and 40.4 +/- 18.4, respectively. Mean TE cell numbers were 31.7 +/- 18.2, 28.9 +/- 13.3, 31.2 +/- 13.3 and 26.2 +/- 16.5 while mean ICM cell numbers were 23.0 +/- 9.4, 22.2 +/- 9.4, 21.1 +/- 7.3 and 14.2 +/- 7.3, respectively. Blastocyst and ICM cell numbers were significantly lower in the group derived from ultra-rapidly frozen oocytes compared with all other groups. Significantly more blastocysts had < or = 32 cells and in blastocysts with > 64 cells a lower mean percentage of ICM was found. Ultra-rapid freezing of mouse oocytes with 3.5 M DMSO can thus lead to day 5 in-vitro cultured blastocysts with significantly decreased ICM cell numbers. The residual ICM cell number in affected blastocysts may not reach a critical mass sufficient for successful postimplantation development.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. A. Gook and D. H. Edgar
Human oocyte cryopreservation
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 591 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Uechi, O. Tsutsumi,3, Y. Morita, Y. Takai, and Y. Taketani
Comparison of the effects of controlled-rate cryopreservation and vitrification on 2-cell mouse embryos and their subsequent development
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2827 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.J. Paynter, A. Cooper, L. Gregory, B.J. Fuller, and R.W. Shaw
Permeability characteristics of human oocytes in the presence of the cryoprotectant dimethylsulphoxide
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2338 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.L. Mauri, C.G. Petersen, R.L.R. Baruffi, R.C. Ferreira, and J.G. Franco Jr
Clinical experience with ultrarapid cryopreservation of human embryos resulting from intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Brief communication
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2362 - 2366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.