Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Friedler, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ron-El, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Friedler, S.
Right arrow Articles by Ron-El, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1872-1877, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from patients with obstructive azoospermia--a comparative study

S Friedler, A Raziel, Y Soffer, D Strassburger, D Komarovsky and R Ron-El
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

The aim of our study was to compare the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa retrieved by percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA) or microepididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) from patients with obstructive azoospermia. A retrospective analysis of consecutive ICSI cycles was performed, comparing the outcome in 24 patients with obstructive azoospermia undergoing surgical sperm aspiration by MESA (7 cycles) or PESA (17 cycles). In 23 of 24 patients, excess spermatozoa were cryopreserved. Following thawing, 21 ICSI cycles were performed (11 cycles after MESA, 10 after PESA). No statistically significant differences were noted in all parameters examined in ICSI cycles with fresh or cryopreserved spermatozoa from the same patients. Comparing all ICSI cycles with fresh and frozen-thawed epididymal spermatozoa, the rates of two-pronuclear fertilization (56% versus 53%), embryo cleavage (90% versus 86%), implantation (10% versus 14%), clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer (32% versus 37%) and delivery/ongoing pregnancy rate (27% versus 26%) were not statistically different. The cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate per sperm retrieval procedure was 46%, respectively. We conclude that the clinical outcome of ICSI with fresh and frozen-thawed spermatozoa after retrieval by PESA was similar to that by MESA. Epididymal sperm cryopreservation in patients with obstructive azoospermia is feasible and efficient using a simple freezing protocol and should be offered to optimize the yield of pregnancies achieved following such procedures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M.-W. Li, S. Meyers, T. L. Tollner, and J. W. Overstreet
Damage to Chromosomes and DNA of Rhesus Monkey Sperm Following Cryopreservation
J Androl, July 1, 2007; 28(4): 493 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.D.M. Nicopoullos, C. Gilling-Smith, P.A. Almeida, and J.W.A. Ramsay
The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. Tesarik and C. Mendoza
Using the Male Gamete for Assisted Reproduction: Past, Present, and Future
J Androl, May 1, 2003; 24(3): 317 - 328.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. Wood, V. Sephton, T. Searle, K. Thomas, K. Schnauffer, S. Troup, C. Kingsland, and I. Lewis-Jones
Effect on Clinical Outcome of the Interval Between Collection of Epididymal and Testicular Spermatozoa and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Obstructive Azoospermia
J Androl, January 1, 2003; 24(1): 67 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, D. Strassburger, M. Schachter, Y. Soffer, and R. Ron-El
Factors influencing the outcome of ICSI in patients with obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: a comparative study
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3114 - 3121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
P. N. Kolettis
The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient
J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Kuczynski, M. Dhont, C. Grygoruk, D. Grochowski, S. Wolczynski, and M. Szamatowicz
The outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of fresh and cryopreserved ejaculated spermatozoa--a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2109 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Cayan, D. Lee, J. Conaghan, C. A. Givens, I. P. Ryan, E. D. Schriock, and P. J. Turek
A comparison of ICSI outcomes with fresh and cryopreserved epididymal spermatozoa from the same couples
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.