Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 1968-1974, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press
R Fanchin, C Righini, F Olivennes, S Taylor, D de Ziegler and R Frydman
To investigate the possible consequences of uterine contractions (UC) as
visualized by ultrasound (US) on in-vitro fertilization (IVF)-embryo
transfer outcome, we studied prospectively 209 infertile women undergoing
220 cycles of controlled ovarian stimulation. Inclusion criteria were age
< or = 38 years, a morphologically normal uterus, and at least three
good quality embryos transferred. Just before embryo transfer, women
underwent 5 min digital recordings of the uterus using US image analysis
software for UC assessment. Plasma progesterone and oestradiol
concentrations were measured. Four groups were defined according to UC
frequency: < or = 3.0 (n = 53), 3.1-4.0 (n = 50), 4.1- 5.0 (n = 43), and
> 5.0 (n = 74) UC/min respectively. Patients, controlled ovarian
hyperstimulation and embryology characteristics were comparable in all
groups. A stepwise decrease in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates as well
as in implantation rates occurred from the lowest to the highest UC
frequency groups (53, 36, 21; 46, 32, 20; 23, 19, 10; and 14, 11, 4%; P
< 0.001). Plasma progesterone and UC frequency were negatively
correlated (r = -0.34, P < 0.001). Direction of UC did not affect embryo
transfer outcome. As this study was controlled strictly for confounding
variables and UC were assessed objectively by a computerized system, its
results indicate that high frequency UC on the day of embryo transfer
hinder IVF-embryo transfer outcome, possibly by expelling embryos out of
the uterine cavity. The negative correlation between UC frequency and
progesterone concentrations supports the uterine relaxing properties of
progesterone.
ARTICLES
Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Reproductive Endocrinology, Hopital Antoine Beclere, Clamart, France.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Feil, R. C. Henshaw, and M. Lane Day 4 embryo selection is equal to Day 5 using a new embryo scoring system validated in single embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1505 - 1510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, and A. N. Andersen Acupuncture with in vitro fertilisation BMJ, March 8, 2008; 336(7643): 517 - 518. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.M. Fatemi, B. Popovic-Todorovic, E. Papanikolaou, P. Donoso, and P. Devroey An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 581 - 590. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Romundstad, P. R. Romundstad, A. Sunde, V. von During, R. Skjaerven, and L. J. Vatten Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2353 - 2358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Shamonki, G. L. Schattman, S. D. Spandorfer, P. H. Chung, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2844 - 2849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Marikinti and P. R. Brinsden 'The presence of blood in the transfer catheter negatively influences outcome at embryo transfer' Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 2029 - 2030. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Nawroth and M. Ludwig What is the 'ideal' duration of progesterone supplementation before the transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in estrogen/progesterone replacement protocols? Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1127 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Shamonki, S. D. Spandorfer, and Z. Rosenwaks Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 709 - 716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mansour Minimizing embryo expulsion after embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 170 - 174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Matorras, R. Mendoza, A. Exposito, and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero Influence of the time interval between embryo catheter loading and discharging on the success of IVF Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2027 - 2030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, and G. Makedos Cervical dilatation has a positive impact on the outcome of IVF in randomly assigned cases having two previous difficult embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1791 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Eytan, D. Elad, U. Zaretsky, and A. J. Jaffa A glance into the uterus during in vitro simulation of embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 562 - 569. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.B. Henne and A.A. Milki Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 570 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Hoffmann, F. Stanke-Labesque, R. Fanchin, N. Dilai, J.C. Pons, and J.M. Ayoubi Effects of L-arginine and sodium nitroprusside on the spontaneous contractility of human non-pregnant uterus Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 148 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, F. Martinez, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized clinical trial Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2885 - 2890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Tomas, K. Tikkinen, L. Tuomivaara, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen The degree of difficulty of embryo transfer is an independent factor for predicting pregnancy Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2632 - 2635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Matorras, E. Urquijo, R. Mendoza, B. Corcostegui, A. Exposito, and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy rates and increases the frequency of easy transfers Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1762 - 1766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.N. Sallam, A.F. Agameya, A.F. Rahman, F. Ezzeldin, and A.N. Sallam Ultrasound measurement of the uterocervical angle before embryo transfer: a prospective controlled study Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1767 - 1772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R.T. Mansour and M.A. Aboulghar Optimizing the embryo transfer technique Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1149 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.P. Biervliet, P. Lesny, S.D. Maguiness, and S.R. Killick Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5 Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1131 - 1132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Prapas, N. Prapas, A. Hatziparasidou, P. Vanderzwalmen, M. Nijs, S. Prapa, and G. Vlassis Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5 Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1132 - 1132. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F.P. Biervliet, P. Lesny, S.D. Maguiness, J. Robinson, and S.R. Killick Transmyometrial embryo transfer and junctional zone contractions Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 347 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kojima, M. Nomiyama, T. Kumamoto, Y. Matsumoto, and T. Iwasaka Transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves pregnancy and implantation rates after IVF Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2578 - 2582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Eytan, F. Azem, I. Gull, I. Wolman, D. Elad, and A. J. Jaffa The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2662 - 2667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bulletti, D. DeZiegler, M. Stefanetti, E. Cincinelli, E. Pelosi, and C. Flamigni Endometriosis: absence of recurrence in patients after endometrial ablation Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2676 - 2679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Prapas, N. Prapas, A. Hatziparasidou, P. Vanderzwalmen, M. Nijs, S. Prapa, and G. Vlassis Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer maximizes the IVF results on day 3 and day 4 embryo transfer but has no impact on day 5 Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1904 - 1908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Papageorgiou, R. M. Hearns-Stokes, M. P. Leondires, B. T. Miller, P. Chakraborty, D. Cruess, and J. Segars Training of providers in embryo transfer: what is the minimum number of transfers required for proficiency? Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1415 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Fanchin, J.-M. Ayoubi, C. Righini, F. Olivennes, L. M. Schonauer, and R. Frydman Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1115 - 1119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Martinez, B. Coroleu, M. Parriego, O. Carreras, I. Belil, N. Parera, L. Hereter, R. Buxaderas, and P.N. Barri Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer: immediate withdrawal of the catheter versus a 30 second wait Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 871 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Tremellen, D. Valbuena, J. Landeras, A. Ballesteros, J. Martinez, S. Mendoza, R. J. Norman, S. A. Robertson, and C. Simon The effect of intercourse on pregnancy rates during assisted human reproduction Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2653 - 2658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.E. Egbase, M. Al-Sharhan, and J.G. Grudzinskas Influence of position and length of uterus on implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in IVF and embryo transfer treatment cycles Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1943 - 1946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Puttemans, R. Campo, S. Gordts, and I. Brosens Hydrosalpinx and ART: Hydrosalpinx - functional surgery or salpingectomy? Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1427 - 1430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Coroleu, O. Carreras, A. Veiga, A. Martell, F. Martinez, I. Belil, L. Hereter, and P.N. Barri Embryo transfer under ultrasound guidance improves pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 616 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Wood, F. R. Batzer, K. J. Go, J. N. Gutmann, and S. L. Corson Ultrasound-guided soft catheter embryo transfers will improve pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 107 - 112. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lesny, S.R. Killick, J. Robinson, G. Raven, and S.D. Maguiness Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 1999; 14(9): 2367 - 2370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lesny, S.R. Killick, R.L. Tetlow, D.J. Manton, J. Robinson, and S.D. Maguiness Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine zonal anatomy during in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1593 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.K.S. Kan, H.I. Abdalla, A.H. Gafar, L. Nappi, B.O. Ogunyemi, A. Thomas, and O.O. Ola-ojo Embryo transfer: ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch Hum. Reprod., May 1, 1999; 14(5): 1259 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.T. Kovacs What factors are important for successful embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 590 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nikas, O. H. Develioglu, J. P. Toner, and H. W. Jones Jr Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 787 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


