Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (77)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivennes, F.
Right arrow Articles by Frydman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivennes, F.
Right arrow Articles by Frydman, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 2411-2414, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

The use of a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) in a single dose protocol in IVF-embryo transfer: a dose finding study of 3 versus 2 mg

F Olivennes, S Alvarez, P Bouchard, R Fanchin, J Salat-Baroux and R Frydman
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, A.Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France.

New gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, which allow suppression of luteinizing hormone (LH) surges, have recently become available. We compared in this study the results of a single administration of 3 versus 2 mg Cetrorelix in 65 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization (IVF). The GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix) was non-randomly administered at a dose of 3 mg (34 patients) or 2 mg (32 patients) on day 8 of the stimulation cycle. In the case of slow follicular development, the injection was delayed until oestradiol reached 400 pg/ml. No difference was observed in the decrease in LH and in oestradiol secretion between the 3 and the 2 mg groups, but the LH secretion was suppressed for a shorter time in the 2 mg group. No LH surge was observed in the 3 mg group, while one surge (3%) and one significant rise in LH were observed in the 2 mg group. No significant difference was observed in IVF results in the two groups of patients. This study demonstrates that a single injection of 3 or 2 mg successfully prevents LH surges for at least 3 days in all the patients treated. The LH rises in the 2 mg group led us to choose the 3 mg dose as a safer dose in our single administration protocol.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Hayden
GnRH analogues: applications in assisted reproductive techniques
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S17 - S25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Huirne, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk
Are GnRH antagonists comparable to agonists for use in IVF?
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2805 - 2813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B.C. Tarlatzis, B.C. Fauser, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and , On Behalf of the Brussels GnRH Antagonist Consen
GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 333 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I.E. Messinis, D. Loutradis, E. Domali, C.P. Kotsovassilis, L. Papastergiopoulou, A. Kallitsaris, P. Drakakis, K. Dafopoulos, and S. Milingos
Alternate day and daily administration of GnRH antagonist may prevent premature luteinization to a similar extent during FSH treatment
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3192 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges in IVF/ICSI patients: antide and hormone levels
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2206 - 2215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. M. Kolibianakis, C. Albano, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A. C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Initiation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist on Day 1 as Compared to Day 6 of Stimulation: Effect on Hormonal Levels and Follicular Development in in Vitro Fertilization Cycles
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2003; 88(12): 5632 - 5637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-L. Hwang, L.-W. Huang, B.-C. Hsieh, Y.-L. Tsai, S.-C. Huang, C.-Y. Chen, M.-L. Hsieh, P.-H. Chen, and Y.-H. Lin
Ovarian stimulation by clomiphene citrate and hMG in combination with cetrorelix acetate for ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 45 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Al-Inany and M. Aboulghar
GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 874 - 885.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. A. Akman, H. F. Erden, S. B. Tosun, N. Bayazit, E. Aksoy, and M. Bahceci
Comparison of agonistic flare-up-protocol and antagonistic multiple dose protocol in ovarian stimulation of poor responders: results of a prospective randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2001; 16(5): 868 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. A. Akman, H. F. Erden, S. B. Tosun, N. Bayazit, E. Aksoy, and M. Bahceci
Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2000; 15(10): 2145 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Albano, R.E. Felberbaum, J. Smitz, H. Riethmuller-Winzen, J. Engel, K. Diedrich, and P. Devroey
Ovarian stimulation with HMG: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 526 - 531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Craft, A. Gorgy, J. Hill, D. Menon, and B. Podsiadly
Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered `difficult responders' to GnRH agonist protocols?
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 2959 - 2962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. L. Barbieri and M. D. Hornstein
Assisted Reproduction-In Vitro Fertilization Success Is Improved by Ovarian Stimulation with Exogenous Gonadotropins and Pituitary Suppression with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 1999; 20(3): 249 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. H. Balen, C. J. Hayden, and A. J. Rutherford
Clinical efficacy of recombinant gonadotrophins
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1411 - 1417.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rongieres-Bertrand, F. Olivennes, C. Righini, R. Fanchin, J. Taieb, S. Hamamah, P. Bouchard, and R. Frydman
Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 1999; 14(3): 683 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.