Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol 13, 2548-2554, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Controlled comparison of commercial media for human in-vitro fertilization: Menezo B2 medium versus Medi-Cult universal and BM1 medium

C Staessen, C Janssenswillen, E De Clerck and A Van Steirteghem
Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University, Belgium.

For many years, we have been using Menezo B2 medium in our human in- vitro fertilization (IVF) programme. Menezo B2 contains bovine serum albumin, which has in the meantime become less popular. The search for a valid alternative has therefore been initiated. In a first study from December 1993 to June 1994, we compared Menezo B2 medium to Medi-Cult (Medi-Cult Universal IVF medium). In this auto-controlled study, sibling oocytes cultured in Menezo B2 showed a normal fertilization rate similar to that for those cultured in Medi-Cult: 62.9 +/- 33.3 and 61.0 +/- 33.0% respectively (NS; paired t-test). In a second auto- controlled study conducted from November 1995 to March 1996, we compared Menezo B2 to BM1 (Ellios Bio-Media) medium. The normal fertilization rate in the sibling oocytes was similar for those cultured in Menezo B2 and in BM1: 66.9 +/- 27.5 versus 62.0 +/- 31.7% (NS; paired t-test). After further culture of the fertilized oocytes, no difference was apparent in either study as regards the morphological characteristics of the embryos cultured in the different media. The speed of development, however, did differ. In both studies, we observed a higher proportion of the embryos reaching at least the three- to four- cell stage at approximately 41 h post-insemination in Menezo B2 medium than in either Medi-Cult or BM1. As regards the implantation potency of the embryos obtained in the different media, data were collected from the non-randomized transfers. These data indicate no difference between the media tested. This study indicates that the three commercial media with a different composition are equally able to sustain fertilization and embryo development until transfer.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Utsunomiya, T. Naitou, and M. Nagaki
A prospective trial of blastocyst culture and transfer
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1846 - 1851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Ali, M.A.M. Shahata, and S.D. Al-Natsha
Formulation of a protein-free medium for human assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2000; 15(1): 145 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Karamalegos and V.N. Bolton
A prospective comparison of `in house' and commercially prepared Earle's balanced salt solution in human in-vitro fertilization
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 1999; 14(7): 1842 - 1846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.