Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (123)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schlegel, P. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 1, 131-135, January 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision

Peter N. Schlegel1

James Buchanan Brady Foundation, Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell University Medical College, New York, USA

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) is often an effective method for sperm retrieval from men with non-obstructive azoospermia. However, TESE has been a blind procedure that does not identify the focal sperm-producing areas of the testicle until after tissue has been excised from the patient. Experience with a new technique of microdissection of testicular tubules is presented here that identifies sperm-containing regions before their removal. Identification of spermatogenically active regions of the testicle is possible by direct examination of the individual seminiferous tubules. The underlying concept for this technique is simple: seminiferous tubules containing many developing germ cells, rather than Sertoli cells alone, are likely to be larger and more opaque than tubules without sperm production. In a sequential series of TESE cases for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, the ability to find spermatozoa increased from 45% (10/22) to 63% (17/27) after introduction of the microdissection technique. Microdissected samples yielded an average of 160 000 spermatozoa per sample in only 9.4 mg of tissue, whereas only 64 000 spermatozoa were found in standard biopsy samples that averaged 720 mg in weight (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). For men where microdissection was attempted, successful identification of enlarged tubules was possible in 56% (15/27) of cases. However, spermatozoa were retrieved with microdissection TESE for six men in whom sperm retrieval was unsuccessful with standard TESE approaches (35% of all men with spermatozoa retrieved). These findings suggest that microdissection TESE can improve sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia over that achieved with previously described biopsy techniques.

Key words: microdissection/non-obstructive azoospermia/sperm extraction/tissue excision

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Room F-907A, Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell University Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. R. Greenhalgh, T. S. Griffith, and M. Wald
The Use of Immunofluorescence in Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction
J Androl, September 1, 2009; 30(5): 548 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. W. Brown, K. Hwang, P. N. Schlegel, and P. L. Morris
Small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO)-1, SUMO-2/3 and SUMOylation are involved with centromeric heterochromatin of chromosomes 9 and 1 and proteins of the synaptonemal complex during meiosis in men
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2850 - 2857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Ohta, Y. Sakaide, and T. Wakayama
Generation of progeny via ICSI following enrichment of elongated spermatids from mouse testis by flow-cytometric cell sorting
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1612 - 1616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Carmignani, F. Gadda, G. Gazzano, G. Ragni, A. Paffoni, F. Rocco, and G. M. Colpi
Testicular sperm extraction in cancerous testicle in patients with azoospermia: A Case Report
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1068 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.I. McLachlan, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, C.E. Hoei-Hansen, D.M. de Kretser, and N.E. Skakkebaek
Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: Mini Review
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 2 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Vernaeve, G. Verheyen, A. Goossens, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
How successful is repeat testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia?
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1551 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. Hauser, L. Yogev, G. Paz, H. Yavetz, F. Azem, J. B. Lessing, and A. Botchan
Comparison of Efficacy of Two Techniques for Testicular Sperm Retrieval in Nonobstructive Azoospermia: Multifocal Testicular Sperm Extraction Versus Multifocal Testicular Sperm Aspiration
J Androl, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 28 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
M. Wald, L. S. Ross, G. S. Prins, J. Cieslak-Janzen, G. Wolf, and C. S. Niederberger
Analysis of Outcomes of Cryopreserved Surgically Retrieved Sperm for IVF/ICSI
J Androl, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 60 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. Hussein, Y. Ozgok, L. Ross, and C. Niederberger
Clomiphene Administration for Cases of Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Multicenter Study
J Androl, November 1, 2005; 26(6): 787 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. D. Schiff, G. D. Palermo, L. L. Veeck, M. Goldstein, Z. Rosenwaks, and P. N. Schlegel
Success of Testicular Sperm Injection and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection in Men with Klinefelter Syndrome
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6263 - 6267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Fujita, A. Tsujimura, T. Takao, Y. Miyagawa, K. Matsumiya, M. Koga, M. Takeyama, H. Fujioka, K. Aozasa, and A. Okuyama
Expression of inhibin {alpha}, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and stem cell factor in Sertoli cell-only syndrome: relation to successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2289 - 2294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. P. Mulhall, S. W. Ghaly, N. Aviv, and A. Ahmed
The Utility of Optical Loupe Magnification for Testis Sperm Extraction in Men With Nonobstructive Azoospermia
J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 178 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. M. Rossi, L. A.V. Pereira, L. de Santis, F. F. Pasqualotto, A. Iaconelli Jr, V. Ortiz, and E. Borges Jr
Sperm retrieval techniques in rats with suppressed spermatogenesis by experimental cryptorchidism
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 443 - 447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
S. Binsaleh, K. Sircar, and P. T. K. Chan
Feasibility of Simultaneous Testicular Microdissection for Sperm Retrieval and Ipsilateral Testicular Tumor Resection in Azoospermic Men
J Androl, November 1, 2004; 25(6): 867 - 871.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. M. Jequier
Clinical andrology--still a major problem in the treatment of infertility
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1245 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. Kamal, I. Fahmy, R. T. Mansour, A. M. Abou-Setta, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar
Selection of Individual Testicular Tubules From Biopsied Testicular Tissue With a Stereomicroscope Improves Sperm Retrieval Rate
J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.V. Hopps, A. Mielnik, M. Goldstein, G.D. Palermo, Z. Rosenwaks, and P.N. Schlegel
Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1660 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
G. Paz, R. Gamzu, and H. Yavetz
Diagnosis of Nonobstructive Azoospermia: The Laboratory Perspective
J Androl, March 1, 2003; 24(2): 167 - 169.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tsujimura, K. Matsumiya, Y. Miyagawa, A. Tohda, H. Miura, K. Nishimura, M. Koga, M. Takeyama, H. Fujioka, and A. Okuyama
Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2924 - 2929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, M. Schachter, D. Strassburger, O. Bern, and R. Ron-El
Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2356 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sousa, N. Cremades, J. Silva, C. Oliveira, L. Ferraz, J.T. da Silva, P. Viana, and A. Barros
Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm and spermatids
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1800 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
P. N. Kolettis
The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient
J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Coskun, A. Tbakhi, K. A. Jaroudi, M. Uzumcu, T. A. Merdad, and K. A. Al-Hussein
Flow cytometric ploidy analysis of testicular biopsies from sperm-negative wet preparations
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 977 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Westlander, E. Ekerhovd, S. Granberg, N. Lycke, L. Nilsson, C. Werner, and C. Bergh
Serial ultrasonography, hormonal profile and antisperm antibody response after testicular sperm aspiration
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2621 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L.C. Demirel, O. Evirgen, K. Aydos, and C Unlu
The impact of the source of spermatozoa used for ICSI on pronuclear morphology
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2327 - 2332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Amer, T. A. Elnasser, S. E. Haggar, T. Mostafa, G. Abdel-Malak, and W. Zohdy
May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain for detection of spermatogenic cells in the ejaculate: a simple predictive parameter for successful testicular sperm retrieval
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1427 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. J. Silber
Microsurgical TESE and the distribution of spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2278 - 2284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Amer, A. Ateyah, R. Hany, and W. Zohdy
Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 15(3): 653 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Amer, S. E. Haggar, T. Moustafa, T. A. El-Naser, and W. Zohdy
Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 3030 - 3034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.