Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Y.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dong, Y.-L.
Right arrow Articles by Yallampalli, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 1, 27-32, January 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Nitric oxide reverses prostaglandin-induced inhibition in ovarian progesterone secretion in rats

Yuan-Lin Dong, Pandu R.R. Gangula, Li Fang and Chandrasekhar Yallampalli1

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555, USA

The present studies were undertaken to determine whether nitric oxide (NO) is involved in the regulation of ovarian progesterone and oestradiol secretion in rats. Immature female Sprague–Dawley rats at 27 days of age were injected s.c. with 4 IU pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and were killed 72 h after the injection. The ovaries were collected, weighed and cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing saline, NO donor, NO synthesis inhibitor or prostaglandin F2{alpha} (PGF2{alpha}). After 24 h culture, the medium concentrations of progesterone and oestradiol were measured by radioimmunoassay. Results showed that: (i) diethylenetriamine (DETA)/NO (1x10–6, 1x10–5, 1x10–4 M), an NO donor, caused a dose-dependent increase in progesterone synthesis (355 ± 43, 443 ± 46, 647 ± 55 ng/g ovary respectively, P < 0.01) with a concomitant decrease in ovarian oestradiol secretion (408.1 ± 50.7, 272.9 ± 28.2, 132.6 ± 34.6 pg/g ovary respectively, P < 0.01); (ii) neither progesterone nor oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were altered by DETA without NO; (iii) NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (1x10–4 M), an inhibitor of NO synthesis, did not significantly affect progesterone and oestradiol secretion by rat ovaries; (iv) PGF2{alpha} (1x10–6 M) caused a fall in progesterone and oestradiol synthesis; (v) co-incubation with DETA/NO, significantly reversed the PGF2{alpha}-induced decrease in progesterone concentrations from 184 ± 29 to 388 ± 60 ng/g (P < 0.01), but not that of oestradiol. It can be concluded that NO up-regulates progesterone secretion and down-regulates oestradiol secretion in rat ovaries, and NO can reverse PGF2{alpha}-induced inhibition in ovarian progesterone secretion.

Key words: nitric oxide/oestradiol/ovary/prostaglandin/progesterone

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 301 University Boulevard, Medical Research Building Room 11.138, Galveston, Texas 77555–1062, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
V Tripathi and A Krishna
Changes in nitric oxide (NO) synthase isoforms and NO in the ovary of Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch.) during the reproductive cycle
J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 199(2): 307 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
A. T Grazul-Bilska, C. Navanukraw, M. L. Johnson, D. A Arnold, L. P Reynolds, and D. A Redmer
Expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the ovine ovary throughout the estrous cycle.
Reproduction, October 1, 2006; 132(4): 579 - 587.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. J. Jaroszewski, D. J. Skarzynski, R. M. Blair, and W. Hansel
Influence of Nitric Oxide on the Secretory Function of the Bovine Corpus Luteum: Dependence on Cell Composition and Cell-to-Cell Communication
Experimental Biology and Medicine, June 1, 2003; 228(6): 741 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
H. Yang, G. K. Bhat, R. Wadley, K. L. Wright, B. M. Chung, J. A. Whittaker, A. M. Dharmarajan, and R. Sridaran
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone-Agonist Inhibits Synthesis of Nitric Oxide and Steroidogenesis by Luteal Cells in the Pregnant Rat
Biol Reprod, June 1, 2003; 68(6): 2222 - 2231.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. Tamanini, G. Basini, F. Grasselli, and M. Tirelli
Nitric oxide and the ovary
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E1 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. K. Peterson, F. Moran, A. J. Conley, and I. M. Bird
Zonal Expression of Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase in Sheep and Rhesus Adrenal Cortex
Endocrinology, December 1, 2001; 142(12): 5351 - 5363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.L. Cavilla, C.R. Kennedy, M. Baltsen, L.D. Klentzeris, A.G. Byskov, and G.M. Hartshorne
The effects of meiosis activating sterol on in-vitro maturation and fertilization of human oocytes from stimulated and unstimulated ovaries
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 547 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A.B. Motta, A. Estevez, T. Tognetti, M.A.F. Gimeno, and A.M. Franchi
Dual effects of nitric oxide in functional and regressing rat corpus luteum
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 7(1): 43 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Mitsube, M. Mikuni, M. Matousek, and M. Brannstrom
Effects of a nitric oxide donor and nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on luteinizing hormone-induced ovulation in the ex-vivo perfused rat ovary
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 1999; 14(10): 2537 - 2543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.