Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staessen, C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Steirteghem, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 10, 2474-2479, October 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen

Catherine Staessen1, Michel Camus, Koen Clasen, Anick De Vos and André Van Steirteghem

Centre for Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital, Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium

An auto-controlled study was conducted in couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. The fertilization rates and embryonic development in sibling oocytes treated, using the same semen sample, either by conventional in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at the same time were compared. Sibling oocyte–cumulus complexes (OCC) of 56 different couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen were randomly divided in order of retrieval into two groups inseminated either by conventional IVF or by ICSI. Of the retrieved OCC in the same cohort, 53.0 ± 31.2 and 62.0 ± 26.6% showed two distinct pronuclei after conventional IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Complete fertilization failure occurred after conventional IVF in 12.5% (7/56 couples). After ICSI, the comparable figure was 3.6% (2/56). The number of cases was too small to apply a statistical test to this difference. Total cleavage rates were quite similar: 86.7 ± 28.0 and 90.1 ± 21% of the zygotes developed into transferable embryos after IVF and ICSI respectively (not significant). Similarly, no difference in embryo quality was observed. Although injection and insemination of the oocytes were performed at the same time in the two groups, at 42 h post-insemination more embryos were at the four-cell stage after ICSI (P < 0.001) than after conventional IVF, where more embryos were still at the two-cell stage (P < 0.02). Embryo transfer was possible in all 56 couples, resulting in 16 positive serum human chorionic gonadotrophin tests (28.6% per embryo transfer), from which a clinical pregnancy resulted in 15 couples. The best embryos were selected for transfer independently of the insemination procedure, but preferably from the same origin. There appeared to be no difference in implantation potency of the embryos obtained with either technique after the non-randomized transfers.

Key words: IVF versus ICSI/sibling oocytes/tubal infertility

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-L. Hwang, K.-M. Seow, Y.-H. Lin, B.-C. Hsieh, L.-W. Huang, H.-J. Chen, S.-C. Huang, C.-Y. Chen, P.-H. Chen, and C.-R. Tzeng
IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1261 - 1265.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. De Rycke, I. Georgiou, K. Sermon, W. Lissens, P. Henderix, H. Joris, P. Platteau, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers
PGD for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1
Mol. Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 11(1): 65 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Van de Velde, I. Georgiou, M. De Rycke, R. Schots, K. Sermon, W. Lissens, P. Devroey, A. Van Steirteghem, and I. Liebaers
Novel universal approach for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of {beta}-thalassaemia in combination with HLA matching of embryos
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 700 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Archer, D. A. Gook, and D. H. Edgar
Blastocyst formation and cell numbers in human frozen-thawed embryos following extended culture
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1669 - 1673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Oehninger and R. G. Gosden
Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?: No, not in light of the scientific data
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2237 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Plachot, J. Belaisch-Allart, J.-M. Mayenga, A. Chouraqui, L. Tesquier, and A. M. Serkine
Outcome of conventional IVF and ICSI on sibling oocytes in mild male factor infertility
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 362 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Ola, M. Afnan, K. Sharif, S. Papaioannou, N. Hammadieh, and C. L.R.Barratt
Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?: Considerations of fertilization and embryo development, cost ffectiveness and safety
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2485 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Wu, D. T. Carrell, and A. L. Wilcox
Development of In Vitro-Matured Oocytes from Porcine Preantral Follicles Following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1579 - 1585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T.A. Griffiths, A.P. Murdoch, and M. Herbert
Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1592 - 1596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Fishel, I. Aslam, F. Lisi, L. Rinaldi, J. Timson, M. Jacobson, L. Gobetz, S. Green, A. Campbell, and R. Lisi
Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception?
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1278 - 1283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.