Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (162)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Right arrow Articles by Valkenburg, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Right arrow Articles by Valkenburg, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 10, 2581-2587, October 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial

Jan Gerris1, Diane De Neubourg, Kathelijne Mangelschots, Eric Van Royen, Muriel Van de Meerssche and Marion Valkenburg

Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics–Gynaecology–Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020, Antwerp, Belgium

A prospective randomized study comparing single embryo transfer with double embryo transfer after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) was carried out. First, top quality embryo characteristics were delineated by retrospectively analysing embryos resulting in ongoing twins after double embryo transfer. A top quality embryo was characterized by the presence of 4 or 5 blastomeres at day 2 and at least 7 blastomeres on day 3 after insemination, the absence of multinucleated blastomeres and <20% cellular fragments on day 2 and day 3 after fertilization. Using these criteria, a prospective study was conducted in women <34 years of age, who started their first IVF/ICSI cycle. Of 194 eligible patients, 110 agreed to participate of whom 53 produced at least two top quality embryos and were prospectively randomized. In all, 26 single embryo transfers resulted in 17 conceptions, 14 clinical and 10 ongoing pregnancies [implantation rate (IR) = 42.3%; ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) = 38.5%] with one monozygotic twin; 27 double embryo transfers resulted in 20 ongoing conceptions with six (30%) twins (IR = 48.1%; OPR = 74%). We conclude that by using single embryo transfer and strict embryo criteria, an OPR similar to that in normal fertile couples can be achieved after IVF/ICSI, while limiting the dizygotic twin pregnancy rate to its natural incidence of <1% of all ongoing pregnancies.

Key words: IVF/single embryo transfer/twin pregnancy

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.M. van Peperstraten, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G Hermens, L. Jansen, E. Scheenjes, D.D.M. Braat, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer
Why don't we perform elective single embryo transfer? A qualitative study among IVF patients and professionals
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2008; 23(9): 2036 - 2042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Belva, S. Henriet, E. Van den Abbeel, M. Camus, P. Devroey, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, P. Haentjens, and M. Bonduelle
Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod., July 14, 2008; (2008) den254v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Obstetrician and GynaecologistHome page
I. Kosmas, J. Van der Elst, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Elective single embryo transfer
Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2008; 10(3): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESHRE MonogrHome page
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont
Assisted reproductive technologies: how to minimize the risks and complications in developing countries?
ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 73 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
A. BORINI, M. CATTOLI, C. BULLETTI, and G. COTICCHIO
Clinical Efficiency of Oocyte and Embryo Cryopreservation
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2008; 1127(1): 49 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.O. Karlstrom and C. Bergh
Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2202 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J. A. Land, C. D. Dirksen, J. L. Severens, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
eSET irrespective of the availability of a good-quality embryo in the first cycle only is not effective in reducing overall twin pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1669 - 1674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey
Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. J. Stillman
A 47-Year-Old Woman With Fertility Problems Who Desires a Multiple Pregnancy
JAMA, February 28, 2007; 297(8): 858 - 867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.L. Severens, C.D. Dirksen, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.A. Land, and J.L.H. Evers
Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, I. Delbaere, J. Gerris, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, J. Van der Elst, M. Temmerman, and M. Dhont
Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Das, R. Chattopadhyay, S. Ghosh, S. Ghosh, S.K. Goswami, B.N. Chakravarty, and K. Chaudhury
Reactive oxygen species level in follicular fluid--embryo quality marker in IVF?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2403 - 2407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, A. Tiitinen, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2098 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg and J. Gerris
What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go?
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 843 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers
The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, C. de Klerk, J.D.F. Habbema, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 344 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, A. A.A. Fiddelers, J.M. Janssen, J. G. Derhaag, C. D. Dirksen, G. A.J. Dunselman, J. A. Land, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 338 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. T. Kjellberg, P. Carlsson, and C. Bergh
Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 210 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
Z. Pandian, A. Templeton, G. Serour, and S. Bhattacharya
Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2681 - 2687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A. Collins
Associate editor's commentary: Mathematical modelling and clinical prediction
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2932 - 2934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Porter, and S. Bhattacharya
Investigation of staff and patients' opinions of a proposed trial of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2523 - 2530.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds
Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Blennborn, S. Nilsson, C. Hillervik, and D. Hellberg
The couple's decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer?
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1292 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. B. Inge, P. R. Brinsden, and K. T. Elder
Oocyte number per live birth in IVF: were Steptoe and Edwards less wasteful?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 588 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.G.M. Lukassen, D. D.Braat, A. M.M. Wetzels, G. A. Zielhuis, E. M.M. Adang, E. Scheenjes, and J. A.M. Kremer
Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 702 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, and J. L.H. Evers
Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 433 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Bergh
Single embryo transfer: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 323 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Saldeen and P. Sundstrom
Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 4 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens
Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjo, B. Jablonowska, A. Pinborg, A. Strandell, and C. Bergh
Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization
N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 2004; 351(23): 2392 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. E. Messinis and E. Domali
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1933 - 1935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bhattacharya and A. Templeton
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1939 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U.B. Wennerholm and C. Bergh
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Singleton live births should also include preterm births
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1943 - 1945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers
Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Martikainen, M. Orava, J. Lakkakorpi, and L. Tuomivaara
Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1364 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.-L. Windt, T.F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, and C.J. Lombard
Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg, E. Van Royen, J. Vander Elst, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, P. Kok, M. Elseviers, L. Annemans, et al.
A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 917 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, A. Taylor, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, P. Rowell, P. Seed, and P. Braude
Pituitary suppression in ultrasound-monitored frozen embryo replacement cycles. A randomised study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 874 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Jaroudi, S. Al-Hassan, U. Sieck, H. Al-Sufyan, M. Al-Kabra, and S. Coskun
Zygote transfer on day 1 versus cleavage stage embryo transfer on day 3: a prospective randomized trial
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 645 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
N. S. MACKLON and B.C. J.M. FAUSER
Mild Stimulation in In Vitro Fertilization
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., November 1, 2003; 997(1): 105 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, S. Vilska, S. Makinen, T. Foudila, and A.-M. Suikkari
Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1858 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, and A. N. Andersen
Morbidity in a Danish National cohort of 472 IVF/ICSI twins, 1132 non-IVF/ICSI twins and 634 IVF/ICSI singletons: health-related and social implications for the children and their families
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1234 - 1243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf, K. Al-Darazi, F. O'Mahony, E. Wharf, A. Taylor, and P. Braude
Cryo-thawed embryos obtained from conception cycles have double the implantation and pregnancy potential of those from unsuccessful cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1313 - 1318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri
Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt, and A. N. Andersen
Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.A. Land and J.L.H. Evers
Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 455 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. P. Hohmann, N. S. Macklon, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
A Randomized Comparison of Two Ovarian Stimulation Protocols with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Cotreatment for in Vitro Fertilization Commencing Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone on Cycle Day 2 or 5 with the Standard Long GnRH Agonist Protocol
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont
A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2891 - 2896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris
Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert
Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
B. Blondel, M. D. Kogan, G. R. Alexander, N. Dattani, M. S. Kramer, A. Macfarlane, and S. W. Wen
The Impact of the Increasing Number of Multiple Births on the Rates of Preterm Birth and Low Birthweight: An International Study
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2002; 92(8): 1323 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]