Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (34)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zohdy, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Amer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Zohdy, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 12, 3030-3034, December 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition

Medhat Amer1,2,3, Shawky El Haggar1, Taymour Moustafa1, Taha Abd El-Naser1,2 and Wael Zohdy1

1 Department of Andrology, Cairo University Hospitals and 2 Adam International Clinic, 20 Aden Street, Mohandessin, Giza, Egypt

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) may not always be successful in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, as they only have minute foci of active spermatogenesis from which a tiny number of spermatozoa can be extracted. The aim of this study was to find the percentile incidence of successful TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia patients in relation to various histopathological patterns and the number of performed biopsies, and to determine the optimal time needed for repetition. A total of 216 patients underwent bilateral testicular biopsy taking a single piece from each testis for sperm retrieval and pathological evaluation. In another 100 patients, the same procedure was done but taking multiple samples (maximum four samples/testis). Spermatozoa were successfully retrieved from 37.5 and 49% of patients who supplied single and multiple samples respectively. TESE was significantly higher when multiple samples were taken in all histopathological groups except for Sertoli cell-only syndrome, tubular sclerosis and Klinefelter's pattern. Twenty-seven patients underwent repeated TESE for ICSI between 1 and 24 months from the first procedure; all of them had easy sperm retrieval during the first procedure. Although sperm retrieval was successful in 75 and 94.7% of patients who underwent the second attempt, before and after 3 months respectively, a second TESE was usually more difficult and necessitated multiple sampling.

Key words: azoospermia/sperm retrieval/testicular biopsy/testicular sperm extraction

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.I. McLachlan, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, C.E. Hoei-Hansen, D.M. de Kretser, and N.E. Skakkebaek
Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: Mini Review
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 2 - 16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Vernaeve, G. Verheyen, A. Goossens, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
How successful is repeat testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia?
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1551 - 1554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Koscinski, C. Wittemer, J.M. Rigot, M. De Almeida, E. Hermant, and A. Defossez
Seminal haploid cell detection by flow cytometry in non-obstructive azoospermia: a good predictive parameter for testicular sperm extraction
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1915 - 1920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
J. P. Mulhall, S. W. Ghaly, N. Aviv, and A. Ahmed
The Utility of Optical Loupe Magnification for Testis Sperm Extraction in Men With Nonobstructive Azoospermia
J Androl, March 1, 2005; 26(2): 178 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
A. Kamal, I. Fahmy, R. T. Mansour, A. M. Abou-Setta, G. I. Serour, and M. A. Aboulghar
Selection of Individual Testicular Tubules From Biopsied Testicular Tissue With a Stereomicroscope Improves Sperm Retrieval Rate
J Androl, January 1, 2004; 25(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Oates, S. Silber, L. G. Brown, and D. C. Page
Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men with microdeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2813 - 2824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Friedler, A. Raziel, M. Schachter, D. Strassburger, O. Bern, and R. Ron-El
Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2356 - 2361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sousa, N. Cremades, J. Silva, C. Oliveira, L. Ferraz, J.T. da Silva, P. Viana, and A. Barros
Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm and spermatids
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1800 - 1810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
P. N. Kolettis
The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient
J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Rosenlund, U. Kvist, L. Ploen, U. Ekstrom, and O. Hovatta
Percutaneous cutting needle biopsies for histopathological assessment and sperm retrieval in men with azoospermia
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2154 - 2159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Amer, T. A. Elnasser, S. E. Haggar, T. Mostafa, G. Abdel-Malak, and W. Zohdy
May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain for detection of spermatogenic cells in the ejaculate: a simple predictive parameter for successful testicular sperm retrieval
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1427 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Francavilla, M. A. Bianco, G. Cordeschi, P. D'Abrizio, C. De Stefano, G. Properzi, and F. Francavilla
Ultrastructural analysis of chromatin defects in testicular spermatids in azoospermic men submitted to TESE-ICSI
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1440 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.