Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 2, 470-475,
February 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Rapid visualization of metaphase chromosomes in single human blastomeres after fusion with in-vitro matured bovine eggs
1 The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas, Livingston, New Jersey, USA and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Hashomer, Tel-Aviv, Israel
The present study was aimed to facilitate karyotyping of human blastomeres using the metaphase-inducing factors present in unfertilized eggs. A rapid technique for karyotyping would have wide application in the field of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. When cryopreserved in-vitro matured bovine oocytes were fused with human blastomeres, the transferred human nuclei were forced into metaphase within a few hours. Eighty-seven human blastomeres from abnormal or arrested embryos were fused with bovine oocytes in a preclinical study. Fusion efficiency was 100%. In 21 of the hybrid cells, no trace of human chromatin was found. Of the remaining 66, 64 (97%) yielded chromosomes suitable for analysis. The method was used to karyotype embryos from two patients with maternal translocations. One embryo which was judged to be karyotypically normal was replaced in the first patient, resulting in one pregnancy with a normal fetus. None of the second patient's embryos was diagnosed as normal, and hence none was transferred. The results of the present study demonstrated that the ooplasmic factors which induce and maintain metaphase in bovine oocytes can force transferred human blastomere nuclei into premature metaphase, providing the basis for a rapid method of karyotyping blastomeres from preimplantation embryos and, by implication, cells from other sources.
Key words: electrofusion/FISH/nuclear transplantation/spectral karyotyping/translocation
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas, 101 Old Short Hills Road, Suite 501, West Orange, NJ 07052, USA
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Pujol, J. Benet, C. Staessen, E. Van Assche, M. Campillo, J. Egozcue, and J. Navarro The importance of aneuploidy screening in reciprocal translocation carriers. Reproduction, June 1, 2006; 131(6): 1025 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wilton Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, A. P. Ferraretti, M. Toschi, F. Esposito, and M.C. Fasolino The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1163 - 1169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wells and J. D.A. Delhanty Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 6(11): 1055 - 1062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bahce, T. Escudero, M. Sandalinas, L. Morrison, M. Legator, and S. Munne Improvements of preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy by using microwave hybridization, cell recycling and monocolour labelling of probes Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 849 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Coonen, E. Martini, J. C.M. Dumoulin, H. T.M. Hollanders-Crombach, C. de Die-Smulders, J. P.M. Geraedts, A. H.N. Hopman, and J. L.H. Evers Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of a reciprocal translocation t(3;11)(q27.3;q24.3) in siblings Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2000; 6(3): 199 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



