Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 3, 689-693,
March 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
How concordant are the estimated rates of natural conception and in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer success?*
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Joseph Hospital, PO Box 7777, 5500 MB Veldhoven and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Knowledge of the chance to conceive for the subfertile couple is important in the process of counselling and clinical decision making. There are no data available on the reproducibility of the clinician's ability to assess the chance to conceive, both after expectant management or treatment with in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF–embryo transfer). We evaluated this reproducibility by means of a set of case histories presented to a panel of gynaecologists and endocrinologists. A poor reproducibility would indicate a strong need for the use of prognostic models. In 1995, 57 gynaecologists and 32 reproductive endocrinologists were asked to appraise the 1 year spontaneous conception chance as well as the cumulative success rate of three cycles for IVF–embryo transfer of four couples with different medical histories. The clinical and laboratory data of these couples were presented as case histories. The difference between the estimated spontaneous pregnancy chances and the success rate of IVF–embryo transfer was also calculated. Calculation of intra-class correlation coefficients, which can be considered as measures of the reproducibility, demonstrated a substantial reproducibility of the assessment of spontaneous conception chances, but a slight to fair reproducibility of the assessment of IVF–embryo transfer success rates. We conclude that the use of reliable prognostic models for IVF–embryo transfer in the management of subfertility is warranted.
Key words: IVF–embryo transfer success rates/prognosis/reproducibility/spontaneous conception chance
*Presented at the 12th annual meeting of the ESHRE, 1996, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, P. Devroey, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Predictors of ovarian response: progress towards individualized treatment in ovulation induction and ovarian stimulation Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2008; 14(1): 1 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|