Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1005-1012,
April 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Establishment of predictive variables associated with testicular sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia
1 University Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessop Hospital for Women, Leavygreave Road, Sheffield S3 7RE, 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 6TP and 3 Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield S10 2TN, UK
Although testicular biopsy for sperm extraction is a procedure with a potential for complications, sperm retrieval is successful in 30–70% of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. In order to predict the probability of retrieving at least one testicular spermatozoon we conducted a prospective study of a set of variables in 40 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Using the receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined the probability estimates of testicular volume, plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentration, Johnsen score and visualization of testicular spermatids in discriminating between patients with successful and failed testicular sperm extraction. Visualization of testicular spermatids provided the best estimate of success of testicular sperm extraction. Of the factors studied using logistic–regression analysis (age, maternal and paternal age at birth, body mass index, luteinizing hormone, testosterone, FSH, testicular volume, the presence of testicular spermatids and Johnsen score), only the presence of spermatids and Johnsen score were independent variables able to predict the success of testicular sperm extraction. The visualization of the presence of spermatids gave a correct prediction of 77% and Johnsen score of 71%. The diagnostic model derived from these independent predictors when validated in 40 patients using the Jackknife technique gave a correct overall prediction of 87%. The probability of successful testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia could be objectively predicted on the basis of simple histopathological criteria represented by the visualization of testicular spermatids and Johnsen score.
Key words: azoospermia/diagnostic index/germ cells/prediction/sperm retrieval
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessop Hospital for Women, Leavygreave Road, Sheffield S3 7EN, UK
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Loren and O. Lacham-Kaplan The employment of strontium to activate mouse oocytes: effects on spermatid-injection outcome Reproduction, February 1, 2006; 131(2): 259 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Koscinski, C. Wittemer, J.M. Rigot, M. De Almeida, E. Hermant, and A. Defossez Seminal haploid cell detection by flow cytometry in non-obstructive azoospermia: a good predictive parameter for testicular sperm extraction Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1915 - 1920. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Rossi, L. A.V. Pereira, L. de Santis, F. F. Pasqualotto, A. Iaconelli Jr, V. Ortiz, and E. Borges Jr Sperm retrieval techniques in rats with suppressed spermatogenesis by experimental cryptorchidism Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 443 - 447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Chapron, H. Barakat, X. Fritel, J.-B. Dubuisson, G. Breart, and A. Fauconnier Presurgical diagnosis of posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis based on a standardized questionnaire Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 507 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Verheyen, V. Vernaeve, L. Van Landuyt, H. Tournaye, P. Devroey, and A. Van Steirteghem Should diagnostic testicular sperm retrieval followed by cryopreservation for later ICSI be the procedure of choice for all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia? Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2822 - 2830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Vernaeve, C. Staessen, G. Verheyen, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye Can biological or clinical parameters predict testicular sperm recovery in 47,XXY Klinefelter's syndrome patients? Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1135 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Negri, E. Albani, M. DiRocco, G. Morreale, P. Novara, and P.E. Levi-Setti Testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic men submitted to bilateral orchidopexy Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2534 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Sousa, N. Cremades, J. Silva, C. Oliveira, L. Ferraz, J.T. da Silva, P. Viana, and A. Barros Predictive value of testicular histology in secretory azoospermic subgroups and clinical outcome after microinjection of fresh and frozen-thawed sperm and spermatids Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1800 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. N. Kolettis The Evaluation and Management of the Azoospermic Patient J Androl, May 1, 2002; 23(3): 293 - 305. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Vernaeve, H. Tournaye, J. Schiettecatte, G. Verheyen, A.V. Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Serum inhibin B cannot predict testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 971 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Amer, T. A. Elnasser, S. E. Haggar, T. Mostafa, G. Abdel-Malak, and W. Zohdy May-Grunwald-Giemsa stain for detection of spermatogenic cells in the ejaculate: a simple predictive parameter for successful testicular sperm retrieval Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1427 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. I.O. Ezeh Beyond the clinical classification of azoospermia: Opinion Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2356 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Amer, S. E. Haggar, T. Moustafa, T. A. El-Naser, and W. Zohdy Testicular sperm extraction: impact of testicular histology on outcome, number of biopsies to be performed and optimal time for repetition Hum. Reprod., December 1, 1999; 14(12): 3030 - 3034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|