Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (29)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, M. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, M. V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1087-1089, April 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Hydrosalpinges adversely affect implantation in donor oocyte cycles*

Matthew A. Cohen, Steven R. Lindheim and Mark V. Sauer1

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, PH 16–28, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA

Hydrosalpinges have been associated with poor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome in some, but not all, studies, perhaps through endometrial effects. To determine whether hydrosalpinges affect IVF outcome via endometrial factors alone, we analysed the results of recipients of donor oocytes with hydrosalpinges, thereby controlling for confounding variables, while isolating the intrauterine environment. We retrospectively analysed 110 patients who underwent 121 donor oocyte cycles in a university-based assisted reproduction programme. Thirteen cycles involving recipients (n = 10) with hydrosalpinges were compared to 108 cycles involving recipients (n = 100) without hydrosalpinges. Pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy rates were compared between women with and without hydrosalpinges. There were no significant differences between the hydrosalpinx and no hydrosalpinx groups with respect to donor age, recipient age, or number or grade of embryos transferred. Patients with a hydrosalpinx had significantly lower embryo implantation rates (7.1 versus 19.3%, P < 0.05) and significantly higher miscarriage (75.0 versus 14.9%, P < 0.05) and ectopic pregnancy rates (33.3 versus 0.0%, P < 0.05) than normal controls. We conclude that the presence of a hydrosalpinx adversely affects early pregnancy events by altering the intrauterine environment.

Key words: : hydrosalpinx/implantation/in-vitro fertilization/oocyte donation

* Presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Society of Gynecological Investigation, Atlanta, Ga, USA.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Bodri, J. J. Guillen, M. Lopez, V. Vernaeve, and O. Coll
Racial disparity in oocyte donation outcome: a multiethnic, matched cohort study
Hum. Reprod., November 24, 2009; (2009) dep414v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. W. Sagoskin, B. A. Lessey, G. L. Mottla, K. S. Richter, R. J. Chetkowski, A. S. Chang, M. J. Levy, and R. J. Stillman
Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2634 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.R. Lindheim and A.J. Morales
GnRH antagonists followed by a decline in serum estradiol results in adverse outcomes in donor oocyte cycles
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2048 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. J. Levi, J. H. Segars, B. T. Miller, and M. P. Leondires
Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with poor ovarian response and increased cancellation rates in ART cycles
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2610 - 2615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, and J. Thorburn
Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2403 - 2410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. de Vantery Arrighi, H. Lucas, D. El-Mowafi, A. Campana, and D. Chardonnens
Effects of human hydrosalpinx fluid on in-vitro murine fertilization
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 676 - 682.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch
Investigation of the infertile couple: Investigation of the infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a time for reappraisal
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2251 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Strandell, A. Lindhard, U. Waldenstrom, J. Thorburn, P.O. Janson, and L. Hamberger
Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 1999; 14(11): 2762 - 2769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.