Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by dell'Endometriosi, G. I. p. l. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by dell'Endometriosi, G. I. p. l. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1332-1334, May 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Ablation of lesions or no treatment in minimal–mild endometriosis in infertile women: a randomized trial

Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio dell'Endometriosi*

Correspondence: Dr Fabio Parazzini, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche `Mario Negri', via Eritrea, 62–20157 Milano, Italy

In order to analyse the efficacy of resection/ablation of minimal/mild endometriotic lesions for improving fertility, we conducted a randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients were women aged <=36 years who were trying to conceive and had a laparoscopically confirmed diagnosis of minimal/mild endometriosis (stage I or II of the revised American Fertility Society classification) and otherwise unexplained infertility for >=2 years. Eligible women were randomly assigned to resection or ablation of visible endometriosis (54 patients) or diagnostic laparoscopy only (47 patients). After laparoscopy women tried to conceive spontaneously for 1 year (follow-up period). A total of five women withdrew from the study: three for personal reasons, and two were lost to follow-up. Considering 51 women in the resection/ablation and 45 in the no-treatment group who ended the follow-up period, 12 (24%) in the resection/ablation group and 13 (29%) in the no treatment group conceived; the difference was not significant. Two spontaneous abortions were observed in the resection/ablation group and three in the no-treatment one. Thus the 1 year birth rate was 10 out of 51 women (19.6%) in the resection/ablation group and 10 out of 45 women (22.2%) in the no-treatment group. In conclusion, the results of this study do not support the hypothesis that ablation of endometriotic lesions markedly improves fertility rates.

Key words: clinical trial/endometriosis/infertility/laparoscopy

* Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche `Mario Negri' and Prima Clinica Ostetrico Ginecologica, Universita di Milano (co-ordination and data analysis: Fabio Parazzini, Elisabetta Di Cintio, Liliane Chatenoud, Simona Moroni). Ospedale Civile di Benevento (Italo Ardovino, Elisario Struzziero); Firenze, Clinica Ostetrico Ginecologica (Gianluca Bracco 2nd Clinic, Alessandra Pellegrini 1st Clinic); Milano Ospedale `M. Melloni' (Carlo Bertulessi); Milano, Clinica Ostetrico Gineco-logica `Mangiagalli' (Mauro Busacca, Luciano Gruft (2nd Clinic), Guido Ragni (1st Clinic)); Torino, Clinica Ostetrico Ginecologica `Mauriziano' (Marco Massobrio, Cristina Ansaldi); Torino, Ospedale `S. Luigi' (Gian Franco Trossarelli, Enrico Eusebio); Trieste, Clinica Ostetrico Ginecologica (Luigi Troiano, Giuseppe Ricci).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Vercellini, E. Somigliana, P. Vigano, A. Abbiati, G. Barbara, and P. G. Crosignani
Surgery for endometriosis-associated infertility: a pragmatic approach
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 254 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.A. Amer, T.C. Li, M. Metwally, M. Emarh, and W.L. Ledger
Randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic ovarian diathermy with clomiphene citrate as a first-line method of ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 219 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Creus, F. Fabregues, F. Carmona, M. del Pino, D. Manau, and J. Balasch
Combined laparoscopic surgery and pentoxifylline therapy for treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility: a preliminary trial
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1910 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Bosteels, B. Van Herendael, S. Weyers, and T. D'Hooghe
The position of diagnostic laparoscopy in current fertility practice
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2007; 13(5): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Siristatidis and S. Bhattacharya
Unexplained infertility: does it really exist? Does it matter?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2084 - 2087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. Alifano, R. Trisolini, A. Cancellieri, and J. F. Regnard
Thoracic Endometriosis: Current Knowledge
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2006; 81(2): 761 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kennedy, A. Bergqvist, C. Chapron, T. D'Hooghe, G. Dunselman, R. Greb, L. Hummelshoj, A. Prentice, E. Saridogan, and on behalf of the ESHRE Special Interest Group for
ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2698 - 2704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. Brosens, S. Gordts, M. Valkenburg, P. Puttemans, R. Campo, and S. Gordts
Investigation of the infertile couple: when is the appropriate time to explore female infertility?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1689 - 1692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Diagnosis and management of the infertile couple: missing information
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 295 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. A. Collins and A. Van Steirteghem
Overall prognosis with current treatment of infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. A. Akande, L. P. Hunt, D. J. Cahill, and J. M. Jenkins
Differences in time to natural conception between women with unexplained infertility and infertile women with minor endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 96 - 103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Smith, S. M. Pfeifer, and J. A. Collins
Diagnosis and Management of Female Infertility
JAMA, October 1, 2003; 290(13): 1767 - 1770.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. J. Tanahatoe, P. G.A. Hompes, and C. B. Lambalk
Investigation of the infertile couple: Should diagnostic laparoscopy be performed in the infertility work up programme in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination?
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 8 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Fatum
Investigation of the infertile couple: laparoscopy after normal hysterosalpingography?
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1929 - 1929.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Cahill
What is the optimal medical management of infertility and minor endometriosis?: Analysis and future prospects
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1135 - 1140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. L. Olive and E. A. Pritts
Treatment of Endometriosis
N. Engl. J. Med., July 26, 2001; 345(4): 266 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Prentice
Regular review: Endometriosis
BMJ, July 14, 2001; 323(7304): 93 - 95.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch
Investigation of the infertile couple: Investigation of the infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a time for reappraisal
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2251 - 2257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.G. Al-Inany, P.G. Crosignani, and P. Vercellini
Evidence may change with more trials: concepts to be kept in mind
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2000; 15(11): 2447 - 2448.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.