Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. W., Jr
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 8, 2162-2165, August 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The psychological status at school age of children conceived by in-vitro fertilization

Thomas R. Montgomery1,4, Frank Aiello1, Raymond D. Adelman1, Nadia Wasylyshyn1, Mason C. Andrews2, T.Berry Brazelton3, Georgeanna S. Jones2 and Howard W. Jones, Jr2

1 Department of Pediatrics, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA 23507, and 3 Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA

This study assessed the behavioural and psychological profiles of children conceived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) who are now at school age. A total of 743 IVF children born at one institution and now of school age, over 4 years old, were surveyed with Achenbach questionnaires. Follow-up telephone interviews were conducted with non-responders. The results from the study group were compared to the questionnaire control group using one-tailed t-test with statistical significance set less than 0.05. There was an 84% overall response rate. Sixty-seven per cent returned questionnaires. An additional 17% completed a telephone interview. The study group had no statistically significant increase in the rate of behavioural or psychological problems compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences within the study group related to sex or to multiple gestation IVF births. This large group of school-age IVF children has normal psychological development with no identified adverse effect of their status as IVF children. Determining the role, if any, of IVF in the very small number of children with behavioural and psychological problems will require additional study.

Key words: Achenbach/behavioural checklists/behavioural profile/in-vitro fertilization/psychological profile

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentHome page
K. H. Shelton, J. Boivin, D. Hay, M. B.M. van den Bree, F. J. Rice, G. T. Harold, and A. Thapar
Examining differences in psychological adjustment problems among children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies
International Journal of Behavioral Development, September 1, 2009; 33(5): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Knoester, F.M. Helmerhorst, L.A.J. van der Westerlaken, F.J. Walther, S. Veen, and on behalf of the Leiden Artificial Reproductive Te
Matched follow-up study of 5 8-year-old ICSI singletons: child behaviour, parenting stress and child (health-related) quality of life
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3098 - 3107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
B Mahsoudi, A Li, and C O'Neill
Assessment of the Long-Term and Transgenerational Consequences of Perturbing Preimplantation Embryo Development in Mice
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2007; 77(5): 889 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
J. Johnson, T. Hartman, and C. E. Colby
Developmental and Genetic Outcomes in Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproductive Technologies
NeoReviews, December 1, 2006; 7(12): e615 - e626.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, U. Sovio, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, and M.-R. Jarvelin
Growth, psychomotor development and morbidity up to 3 years of age in children born after IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2328 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Colpin and S. Soenen
Parenting and psychosocial development of IVF children: a follow-up study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 1116 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Golombok, A. Brewaeys, M.T. Giavazzi, D. Guerra, F. MacCallum, and J. Rust
The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescence
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 830 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.