Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (178)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Munné, S.
Right arrow Articles by Scott, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 9, 2191-2199, September 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos *

Santiago Munné1,4, Cristina Magli2, Jacques Cohen1, Paula Morton3, Sasha Sadowy1, Luca Gianaroli2, Michael Tucker3, Carmen Márquez1, David Sable1, Anna Pia Ferraretti2, Joe B. Massey3 and Richard Scott1

1 Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, Saint Barnabas, Livingston, NJ, 2 S.I.S.Me.R, Bologna, Italy, 3 Reproductive Biology Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA

Chromosomal abnormalities are responsible for a great deal of embryo wastage, which is reflected, at least partially, in decreased implantation and increased miscarriage in older women. To address this problem the transfer of only chromosomally normal embryos previously selected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed. We designed a multi-centre in-vitro fertilization (IVF) study to compare controls and a test group that underwent embryo biopsy and PGD for aneuploidy. Patients were matched retrospectively, but blindly, for average maternal age, number of previous IVF cycles, duration of stimulation, oestradiol concentrations on day +1, and average mature follicles. All these parameters were similar in test and control groups. Only embryos classified as normal for those chromosomes were transferred after PGD. The results showed that the rates of fetal heart beat (FHB)/embryo transferred between the control and test groups were similar. However, spontaneous abortions, measured as FHB aborted/FHB detected, decreased after PGD (P < 0.05), and ongoing pregnancies and delivered babies increased (P < 0.05) in the PGD group of patients. Two conclusions were obtained: (i) PGD of aneuploidy reduced embryo loss after implantation; (ii) implantation rates were not significantly improved, but the proportion of ongoing and delivered babies was increased.

Key words: in-vitro fertilization/preimplantation genetic diagnosis/trisomy 21, 18, 13, 16

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, Saint Barnabas Medical Center,101 Old Short Hills Rd, Suite 501, Livingston, NJ 07052, USA

* Some of the data in this paper were presented as an abstract in the 54th Annual Meeting of The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998), where it was designated the Prize Paper of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
G. Teklenburg and N. S. Macklon
Review: In Vitro Models for the Study of Early Human Embryo-Endometrium Interactions
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2009; 16(9): 811 - 818.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR)
Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. R. Hernandez
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Beyond aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1538 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sanchez-Castro, A.R. Jimenez-Macedo, M. Sandalinas, and J. Blanco
Prognostic value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis over PGD
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1516 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.E. Beyer, T. Osianlis, K. Boekel, E. Osborne, L. Rombauts, J. Catt, V. Kralevski, B.S. Aali, and L. Gras
Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1212 - 1220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wells, S. Alfarawati, and E. Fragouli
Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH
Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 703 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, K. Lundin, T. Hillensjo, L. Nilsson, J. Stevic, E. Reismer, K. Borg, M. Wikland, and C. Bergh
Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2806 - 2812.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey
Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Yakin and B. Urman
What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. M. Ankum, J. B. Reitsma, and M. Offringa
Reply: Ethical recruitment of patients for PGS trial
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1472 - 1473.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Harper, K. Sermon, J. Geraedts, K. Vesela, G. Harton, A. Thornhill, T. Pehlivan, F. Fiorentino, S. SenGupta, C. de Die-Smulders, et al.
What next for preimplantation genetic screening?
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 478 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, J. van Echten-Arends, B. Sikkema-Raddatz, J. C. Korevaar, H. R. Verhoeve, N. E.A. Vogel, E. G.J.M. Arts, J. W.A. de Vries, P. M. Bossuyt, et al.
In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., July 5, 2007; 357(1): 9 - 17.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey
Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, N. Grieco, E. Cefalu, G. Ruvolo, and A.P. Ferraretti
Cryopreservation of biopsied embryos at the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2656 - 2660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, E. Martini, I. van den Berg, N.S. Macklon, R-J.H. Galjaard, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal
Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 223 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Mastenbroek, P. M.M.Bossuyt, M. J. Heineman, S. Repping, and F. van der Veen
Comment 1 on Staessen et al. (2004). Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial studying preimplantation genetic screening
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2362 - 2363.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
L. Gianaroli, M. C. Magli, and A. P. Ferraretti
Sperm and Blastomere Aneuploidy Detection in Reproductive Genetics and Medicine
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens
Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.R. Thornhill, C.E. deDie-Smulders, J.P. Geraedts, J.C. Harper, G.L. Harton, S.A. Lavery, C. Moutou, M.D. Robinson, A.G. Schmutzler, P.N. Scriven, et al.
ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)'
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 35 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
L. Wilton
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
U. Meister, C. Finck, Y. Stobel-Richter, G. Schmutzer, and E. Brahler
Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, D. Wells, J. Benet, J. F. Sanchez-Garcia, M. G. Bermudez, I. Belil, J. Egozcue, S. Munne, and J. Navarro
Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2118 - 2125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, and M. Elseviers
Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1476 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
D. G. Hu, G. Webb, and N. Hussey
Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization
Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 283 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini
Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 685 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A.P. Ferraretti, M.C. Magli, L. Kopcow, and L. Gianaroli
Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 694 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem
A review of ten years experience of ICSI
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce
FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
T. Pehlivan, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridiation: Clinical Possibliities and Pitfalls
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2003; 10(6): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont
Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
Y. Verlinsky, S. Rechitsky, O. Verlinsky, S. Ozen, T. Sharapova, C. Masciangelo, R. Morris, and A. Kuliev
Preimplantation Diagnosis for Sonic Hedgehog Mutation Causing Familial Holoprosencephaly
N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 2003; 348(15): 1449 - 1454.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Jericho, L. Wilton, D. A. Gook, and D. H. Edgar
A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 568 - 571.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren, C. Hanson, L. Hamberger, and K. Lundin
A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 399 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, S. Munne, B. Balicchia, T. Escudero, and A. Crippa
Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3201 - 3207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
L. Voullaire, L. Wilton, J. McBain, T. Callaghan, and R. Williamson
Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure
Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1035 - 1041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Quenby, G. Vince, R. Farquharson, and J. Aplin
Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature's quality control?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1959 - 1963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. D. Palermo, T. Takeuchi, and Z. Rosenwaks
Technical approaches to correction of oocyte aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2165 - 2173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
L. Wilton, R. Williamson, J. McBain, D. Edgar, and L. Voullaire
Birth of a Healthy Infant after Preimplantation Confirmation of Euploidy by Comparative Genomic Hybridization
N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1537 - 1541.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. Elias
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Comparative Genomic Hybridization
N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1569 - 1571.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Takeuchi, J. Gong, L. L. Veeck, Z. Rosenwaks, and G. D. Palermo
Preliminary findings in germinal vesicle transplantation of immature human oocytes
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 730 - 736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee
ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: data collection II (May 2000)
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2673 - 2683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bahce, T. Escudero, M. Sandalinas, L. Morrison, M. Legator, and S. Munne
Improvements of preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy by using microwave hybridization, cell recycling and monocolour labelling of probes
Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 849 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.