Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 9, 2191-2199,
September 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos *
1 Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, Saint Barnabas, Livingston, NJ, 2 S.I.S.Me.R, Bologna, Italy, 3 Reproductive Biology Associates, Atlanta, GA, USA
Chromosomal abnormalities are responsible for a great deal of embryo wastage, which is reflected, at least partially, in decreased implantation and increased miscarriage in older women. To address this problem the transfer of only chromosomally normal embryos previously selected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed. We designed a multi-centre in-vitro fertilization (IVF) study to compare controls and a test group that underwent embryo biopsy and PGD for aneuploidy. Patients were matched retrospectively, but blindly, for average maternal age, number of previous IVF cycles, duration of stimulation, oestradiol concentrations on day +1, and average mature follicles. All these parameters were similar in test and control groups. Only embryos classified as normal for those chromosomes were transferred after PGD. The results showed that the rates of fetal heart beat (FHB)/embryo transferred between the control and test groups were similar. However, spontaneous abortions, measured as FHB aborted/FHB detected, decreased after PGD (P < 0.05), and ongoing pregnancies and delivered babies increased (P < 0.05) in the PGD group of patients. Two conclusions were obtained: (i) PGD of aneuploidy reduced embryo loss after implantation; (ii) implantation rates were not significantly improved, but the proportion of ongoing and delivered babies was increased.
Key words: in-vitro fertilization/preimplantation genetic diagnosis/trisomy 21, 18, 13, 16
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science, Saint Barnabas Medical Center,101 Old Short Hills Rd, Suite 501, Livingston, NJ 07052, USA
* Some of the data in this paper were presented as an abstract in the 54th Annual Meeting of The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (San Francisco, CA, USA, 1998), where it was designated the Prize Paper of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Teklenburg and N. S. Macklon Review: In Vitro Models for the Study of Early Human Embryo-Endometrium Interactions Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2009; 16(9): 811 - 818. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devroey, B.C.J.M. Fauser, K. Diedrich, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Approaches to improve the diagnosis and management of infertility Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2009; 15(4): 391 - 408. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Hernandez What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Beyond aneuploidy Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1538 - 1541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sanchez-Castro, A.R. Jimenez-Macedo, M. Sandalinas, and J. Blanco Prognostic value of sperm fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis over PGD Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2009; 24(6): 1516 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.E. Beyer, T. Osianlis, K. Boekel, E. Osborne, L. Rombauts, J. Catt, V. Kralevski, B.S. Aali, and L. Gras Preimplantation genetic screening outcomes are associated with culture conditions Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1212 - 1220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wells, S. Alfarawati, and E. Fragouli Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH Mol. Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 14(12): 703 - 710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, K. Lundin, T. Hillensjo, L. Nilsson, J. Stevic, E. Reismer, K. Borg, M. Wikland, and C. Bergh Preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age caused a decrease in clinical pregnancy rate: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2806 - 2812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yakin and B. Urman What next for preimplantation genetic screening? A clinician's perspective Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1686 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Ankum, J. B. Reitsma, and M. Offringa Reply: Ethical recruitment of patients for PGS trial Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1472 - 1473. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Harper, K. Sermon, J. Geraedts, K. Vesela, G. Harton, A. Thornhill, T. Pehlivan, F. Fiorentino, S. SenGupta, C. de Die-Smulders, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 478 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mastenbroek, M. Twisk, J. van Echten-Arends, B. Sikkema-Raddatz, J. C. Korevaar, H. R. Verhoeve, N. E.A. Vogel, E. G.J.M. Arts, J. W.A. de Vries, P. M. Bossuyt, et al. In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening N. Engl. J. Med., July 5, 2007; 357(1): 9 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Donoso, C. Staessen, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and P. Devroey Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 15 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.C. Magli, L. Gianaroli, N. Grieco, E. Cefalu, G. Ruvolo, and A.P. Ferraretti Cryopreservation of biopsied embryos at the blastocyst stage Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2656 - 2660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.B. Baart, E. Martini, I. van den Berg, N.S. Macklon, R-J.H. Galjaard, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 223 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mastenbroek, P. M.M.Bossuyt, M. J. Heineman, S. Repping, and F. van der Veen Comment 1 on Staessen et al. (2004). Design and analysis of a randomized controlled trial studying preimplantation genetic screening Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2362 - 2363. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gianaroli, M. C. Magli, and A. P. Ferraretti Sperm and Blastomere Aneuploidy Detection in Reproductive Genetics and Medicine J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 261 - 267. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.R. Thornhill, C.E. deDie-Smulders, J.P. Geraedts, J.C. Harper, G.L. Harton, S.A. Lavery, C. Moutou, M.D. Robinson, A.G. Schmutzler, P.N. Scriven, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium 'Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)' Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 35 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wilton Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 33 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Meister, C. Finck, Y. Stobel-Richter, G. Schmutzer, and E. Brahler Knowledge and attitudes towards preimplantation genetic diagnosis in Germany Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 231 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gutierrez-Mateo, D. Wells, J. Benet, J. F. Sanchez-Garcia, M. G. Bermudez, I. Belil, J. Egozcue, S. Munne, and J. Navarro Reliability of comparative genomic hybridization to detect chromosome abnormalities in first polar bodies and metaphase II oocytes Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2118 - 2125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, and M. Elseviers Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1476 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Hu, G. Webb, and N. Hussey Aneuploidy detection in single cells using DNA array-based comparative genomic hybridization Mol. Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 10(4): 283 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.B. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5 Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 685 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.P. Ferraretti, M.C. Magli, L. Kopcow, and L. Gianaroli Prognostic role of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in assisted reproductive technology outcome Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 694 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devroey and A. Van Steirteghem A review of ten years experience of ICSI Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 19 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Pehlivan, C. Rubio, L. Rodrigo, J. Remohi, A. Pellicer, and C. Simon Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridiation: Clinical Possibliities and Pitfalls Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2003; 10(6): 315 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Verlinsky, S. Rechitsky, O. Verlinsky, S. Ozen, T. Sharapova, C. Masciangelo, R. Morris, and A. Kuliev Preimplantation Diagnosis for Sonic Hedgehog Mutation Causing Familial Holoprosencephaly N. Engl. J. Med., April 10, 2003; 348(15): 1449 - 1454. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jericho, L. Wilton, D. A. Gook, and D. H. Edgar A modified cryopreservation method increases the survival of human biopsied cleavage stage embryos Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 568 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren, C. Hanson, L. Hamberger, and K. Lundin A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 399 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, S. Munne, B. Balicchia, T. Escudero, and A. Crippa Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3201 - 3207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Voullaire, L. Wilton, J. McBain, T. Callaghan, and R. Williamson Chromosome abnormalities identified by comparative genomic hybridization in embryos from women with repeated implantation failure Mol. Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 8(11): 1035 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Quenby, G. Vince, R. Farquharson, and J. Aplin Recurrent miscarriage: a defect in nature's quality control? Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 1959 - 1963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Palermo, T. Takeuchi, and Z. Rosenwaks Technical approaches to correction of oocyte aneuploidy Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2165 - 2173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wilton, R. Williamson, J. McBain, D. Edgar, and L. Voullaire Birth of a Healthy Infant after Preimplantation Confirmation of Euploidy by Comparative Genomic Hybridization N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1537 - 1541. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Elias Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Comparative Genomic Hybridization N. Engl. J. Med., November 22, 2001; 345(21): 1569 - 1571. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takeuchi, J. Gong, L. L. Veeck, Z. Rosenwaks, and G. D. Palermo Preliminary findings in germinal vesicle transplantation of immature human oocytes Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 730 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: data collection II (May 2000) Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2673 - 2683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bahce, T. Escudero, M. Sandalinas, L. Morrison, M. Legator, and S. Munne Improvements of preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy by using microwave hybridization, cell recycling and monocolour labelling of probes Mol. Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 6(9): 849 - 854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||





