Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Itskovitz-Eldor, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kol, S.
Right arrow Articles by Itskovitz-Eldor, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 9, 2242-2244, September 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze–thaw cycles

S. Kol1, A. Lightman1, T. Hillensjo2, P. Devroey3, B. Fauser4, B. Tarlatzis5, B. Mannaerts6 and J. Itskovitz-Eldor1,7

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel, 2 Fertilitets Centrum, Carlanderska Sjukhuset, Göteborg, Sweden, 3 Academic Hospital, Free University Brussels, Brussels, Belgium, 4 Dijkzigt Academic Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 5 Infertility IVF Centre `Geniki Cliniki', Thessaloniki, Greece and 6 NV Organon, Clinical Development Department, Oss, The Netherlands

The clinical application of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists instead of GnRH agonists, to prevent spontaneous premature luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction treatment has been advocated. A recent, double-blind, dose-finding study, including six dosages of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix, in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), has indicated that high doses of GnRH antagonist (1 or 2 mg once daily) are associated with a low implantation rate. This follow-up study reports on the pregnancy rate after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained in stimulation cycles of the above-mentioned trial. Ovarian stimulation was initiated on day 2 of the cycle, with daily injections of 150 IU recombinant FSH. Ganirelix (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg) was administered once daily from stimulation day 6 onwards, up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin. Retrieved oocytes were fertilized by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and a maximum of three fresh embryos was transferred. Excess embryos were frozen, and subsequently used in either natural or programmed cycles. Until June 1998, 11 ongoing pregnancies (12–16 weeks after embryo transfer) were achieved from 46 cycles in which embryos had been first frozen (23.9% per transfer). Six of these 11 patients had been treated with a high dose of ganirelix (1.0 or 2.0 mg) during the IVF cycles in which the embryos were obtained. In conclusion, our data suggest that high dosages of ganirelix do not adversely affect the potential of embryos to establish clinical pregnancy in freeze–thaw cycles.

Key words: ganirelix/GnRH antagonist/ovarian stimulation/pregnancy/recombinant human FSH

7 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. A.B. Klemmt, F. Liu, J. G. Carver, C. Jones, D. Brosi, J. Adamson, H. J. Mardon, and E. McVeigh
Effects of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues on human endometrial stromal cells and embryo invasion in vitro
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2187 - 2192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Hayden
GnRH analogues: applications in assisted reproductive techniques
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S17 - S25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, J. Collins, B.C. Tarlatzis, P. Devroey, K. Diedrich, and G. Griesinger
Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 651 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Bodri, V. Vernaeve, J.J. Guillen, R. Vidal, F. Figueras, and O. Coll
Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2246 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, J. Collins, B. Tarlatzis, E. Papanikolaou, and P. Devroey
Are endogenous LH levels during ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues associated with the probability of ongoing pregnancy? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Simon, J. Oberye, J. Bellver, C. Vidal, E. Bosch, J.A. Horcajadas, C. Murphy, S. Adams, A. Riesewijk, B. Mannaerts, et al.
Similar endometrial development in oocyte donors treated with either high- or standard-dose GnRH antagonist compared to treatment with a GnRH agonist or in natural cycles
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 3318 - 3327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I.E. Messinis, D. Loutradis, E. Domali, C.P. Kotsovassilis, L. Papastergiopoulou, A. Kallitsaris, P. Drakakis, K. Dafopoulos, and S. Milingos
Alternate day and daily administration of GnRH antagonist may prevent premature luteinization to a similar extent during FSH treatment
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3192 - 3197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
K. Diedrich, R. Frydman, P. Devroey, R. Felberbaum, A.V. Schally, T. Reissmann, and J. Engel
Comment on the debate article: Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1305 - 1306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Kol
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists in ART: lower embryo implantation?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1881 - 1882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
The European Orgalutran Study Group, G. Borm, and B. Mannaerts
Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1490 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. R. Hernandez
Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1211 - 1216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.