Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, No. 9, 2392-2395,
September 1999
© 1999 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth
1 Infertility Clinic, The Family Federation of Finland, PO Box 849, FIN-00101, Helsinki, 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PO Box 140, FIN-00029 HUCH, Finland and 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Hospital, S-14186, Sweden
To avoid multiple pregnancies without compromising pregnancy rates (PR) is a challenge in assisted reproduction. We have compared pregnancy results among 74 elective one-embryo transfers (group 2) and 94 transfers where only one embryo was available (group 1). All the fresh embryo cycles during 1997 in two clinics in Helsinki were analysed, and cumulative PR among these couples after frozen–thawed embryo transfers up to June 1998 were counted. In group 2, where at least two embryos were available for transfer, and only one was transferred on day 2 or 3, the PR per embryo transfer was 29.7%. In group 1, the PR per embryo transfer was 20.2%. In group 2, the cumulative PR after frozen–thawed embryo transfers was 47.3% per oocyte retrieval. Over the same time, 742 two-embryo transfers were carried out. The PR per embryo transfer was 29.4% in these subjects, but 23.9% of these pregnancies were twins. The implantation rates, as well as the PR, were highest when the embryos were at the four- to five-cell stage on day 2 (35.8 versus 9.7% compared with the two- to three-cell stage, P < 0.001) or at the six- to eight-cell stage on day 3 (45.5%). The PR per embryo transfer was higher when a grade 1 or 2 embryo was transferred compared with a grade three embryo (34.0 and 26.7% versus 8.8% respectively, P < 0.05). In women 35 years or younger, the PR per elective one-embryo transfer was 32.8%. The corresponding figure in women older than 35 years was 18.8%. On the basis of these results, elective one-embryo transfer can be highly recommended, at least in subjects who are younger than 35 years of age, and who have grade one or grade two embryos available for transfer.
Key words: embryo transfer/implantation rate/pregnancy rate/single embryo
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Z. Veleva, P. Karinen, C. Tomas, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen Elective single embryo transfer with cryopreservation improves the outcome and diminishes the costs of IVF/ICSI Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2009; 24(7): 1632 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Vilska, L. Unkila-Kallio, R.-L. Punamaki, P. Poikkeus, L. Repokari, J. Sinkkonen, A. Tiitinen, and M. Tulppala Mental health of mothers and fathers of twins conceived via assisted reproduction treatment: a 1-year prospective study Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2009; 24(2): 367 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Belva, S. Henriet, E. Van den Abbeel, M. Camus, P. Devroey, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, P. Haentjens, and M. Bonduelle Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2227 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Kosmas, J. Van der Elst, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye Elective single embryo transfer Obstet Gynaecol (Lond), July 1, 2008; 10(3): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Veleva, A. Tiitinen, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, C. Tomas, H. Martikainen, and J. S. Tapanainen High and low BMI increase the risk of miscarriage after IVF/ICSI and FET Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 878 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.O. Karlstrom and C. Bergh Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2202 - 2207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Pennings and W. Ombelet Coming soon to your clinic: patient-friendly ART Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2075 - 2079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Diedrich, B.C.J.M. Fauser, P. Devroey, G. Griesinger, and on behalf of the Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2007; 13(4): 365 - 377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Donoso, W. Verpoest, E.G. Papanikolaou, I. Liebaers, H.M. Fatemi, K. Sermon, C. Staessen, J. Van der Elst, and P. Devroey Single embryo transfer in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for women <36 years does not reduce delivery rate Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1021 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Poikkeus, M. Gissler, L. Unkila-Kallio, C. Hyden-Granskog, and A. Tiitinen Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1073 - 1079. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. De Sutter, I. Delbaere, J. Gerris, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, J. Van der Elst, M. Temmerman, and M. Dhont Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2633 - 2637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, A. Tiitinen, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36-39 years Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2006; 21(8): 2098 - 2102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. De Neubourg and J. Gerris What about the remaining twins since single-embryo transfer? How far can (should) we go? Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 843 - 846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, C. de Klerk, J.D.F. Habbema, and B.C.J.M. Fauser Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 344 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Pandian, A. Templeton, G. Serour, and S. Bhattacharya Number of embryos for transfer after IVF and ICSI: a Cochrane review Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2681 - 2687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.M. Kissin, L.A. Schieve, and M.A. Reynolds Multiple-birth risk associated with IVF and extended embryo culture: USA, 2001 Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2215 - 2223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H.G.M. Lukassen, D. D.Braat, A. M.M. Wetzels, G. A. Zielhuis, E. M.M. Adang, E. Scheenjes, and J. A.M. Kremer Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 702 - 708. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.A. van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, and J. L.H. Evers Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 433 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Bergh Single embryo transfer: a mini-review Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 323 - 327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Saldeen and P. Sundstrom Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment? Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 4 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. N. Barri Multiple pregnancies: a plea for informed caution Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjo, B. Jablonowska, A. Pinborg, A. Strandell, and C. Bergh Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization N. Engl. J. Med., December 2, 2004; 351(23): 2392 - 2402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Mirkin, G. Nikas, J.-G. Hsiu, J. Diaz, and S. Oehninger Gene Expression Profiles and Structural/Functional Features of the Peri-Implantation Endometrium in Natural and Gonadotropin-Stimulated Cycles J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5742 - 5752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. E. Messinis and E. Domali What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1933 - 1935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bhattacharya and A. Templeton What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1939 - 1942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.B. Wennerholm and C. Bergh What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: Singleton live births should also include preterm births Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1943 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Martikainen, M. Orava, J. Lakkakorpi, and L. Tuomivaara Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1364 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Buckett and S. L. Tan What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The importance of informed choice Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1043 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg, E. Van Royen, J. Vander Elst, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, P. Kok, M. Elseviers, L. Annemans, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 917 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Soderstrom-Anttila, S. Vilska, S. Makinen, T. Foudila, and A.-M. Suikkari Elective single embryo transfer yields good delivery rates in oocyte donation Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2003; 18(9): 1858 - 1863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Vahratian, L. A. Schieve, M. A. Reynolds, and G. Jeng Live-birth rates and multiple-birth risk of assisted reproductive technology pregnancies conceived using thawed embryos, USA 1999-2000 Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1442 - 1448. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, S. Makinen, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 821 - 825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.A. Land and J.L.H. Evers Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: Report of an ESHRE consensus meeting Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 455 - 457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. D. Lambert Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont A health-economic decision-analytic model comparing double with single embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2891 - 2896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Guerif, F. Fourquet, H. Marret, M.-H. Saussereau, C. Barthelemy, C. Lecomte, P. Lecomte, J. Lansac, and D. Royere Cohort follow-up of couples with primary infertility in an ART programme using frozen donor semen Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1525 - 1531. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Engmann, N. Maconochie, S. L. Tan, and J. Bekir Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2598 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Reynolds, L. A. Schieve, G. Jeng, H. B. Peterson, and L. S. Wilcox Risk of Multiple Birth Associated with In Vitro Fertilization using Donor Eggs Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 154(11): 1043 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Vlaisavljevic, B. Kovacic, M. Reljic, V. G. Lovrec, and M. C. Sajko Is there any benefit from the culture of a single oocyte to a blastocyst-stage embryo in unstimulated cycles? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2379 - 2383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Salumets, C. Hyden-Granskog, A.-M. Suikkari, A. Tiitinen, and T. Tuuri The predictive value of pronuclear morphology of zygotes in the assessment of human embryo quality Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2177 - 2181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Martikainen, A. Tiitinen, C. Tomas, J. Tapanainen, M. Orava, L. Tuomivaara, S. Vilska, C. Hyden-Granskog, and O. Hovatta One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1900 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Ozturk, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Templeton Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Evaluation and implementation of new strategies Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1319 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Tiitinen, M. Halttunen, P. Harkki, P. Vuoristo, and C. Hyden-Granskog Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2001; 16(6): 1140 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESHRE Campus Course Report Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 790 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Strandell, C. Bergh, and K. Lundin Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2520 - 2525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Wittemer, K. Bettahar-Lebugle, J. Ohl, C. Rongieres, I. Nisand, and P. Gerlinger Zygote evaluation: an efficient tool for embryo selection Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2591 - 2597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gerris and E. Van Royen Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: A plea for single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2000; 15(9): 1884 - 1888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Templeton Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Replace as many embryos as you like--one at a time Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2000; 15(8): 1662 - 1662. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. E. C. Workshop Group Multiple gestation pregnancy Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2000; 15(8): 1856 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G SUTCLIFFE Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and other aspects of new reproductive technologies Arch. Dis. Child., August 1, 2000; 83(2): 98 - 101. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hazekamp, C. Bergh, U.-B. Wennerholm, O. Hovatta, P.O. Karlstrom, and A. Selbing Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Consideration of new strategies Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1217 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tesarik, A.M. Junca, A. Hazout, F.X. Aubriot, C. Nathan, P. Cohen-Bacrie, and M. Dumont-Hassan Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2000; 15(6): 1396 - 1399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|