Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2108-2111,
October 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Opinion |
Why are boys more likely to be preterm than girls? Plus other related conundrums in human reproduction: Opinion
The Galton Laboratory, University College London, Wolfson House, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK
Abstract
The present note offers two quite different points of interest. The first concerns the cause(s) of preterm labour. This is an important practical problem because of the associated morbidity and mortality. The second point of interest is theoretical. Some logically inter-related empirical propositions are formulated: none has been established but evidence for each is apparently evidence for all. However, as far as I know, there is no formal method of treating such material. It would be useful if methodologists would offer an opinion on whether the practical problem of the causes of preterm birth could be helpfully approached by the accumulation of data on the propositions outlined here. In my opinion, critics should not assess these propositions piecemeal, but should consider the whole edifice of propositions simultaneously. Obstetricians who confine their attention to the delivery of babies should extend it to the circumstances surrounding the conception of those babies. For there may lie the solution to the problem of why boys are more likely to be preterm than girls.
Key words: coital rate/duration of gestation/hormone concentration/sex ratio at birth/time of insemination within the cycle
Notes
This opinion was previously published on Webtrack, July 3, 2000
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cagnacci, A. Renzi, S. Arangino, C. Alessandrini, and A. Volpe Influences of maternal weight on the secondary sex ratio of human offspring Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 442 - 444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cagnacci, A. Renzi, S. Arangino, C. Alessandrini, and A. Volpe The male disadvantage and the seasonal rhythm of sex ratio at the time of conception Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 885 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. James The causes of the excess males among pre-term and post-term births Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2003; 18(3): 655 - 656. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zeitlin, M.-J. Saurel-Cubizolles, J. de Mouzon, L. Rivera, P.-Y. Ancel, B. Blondel, and M. Kaminski Fetal sex and preterm birth: are males at greater risk? Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2762 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H James and I. Banks The fragile male BMJ, March 10, 2001; 322(7286): 617a - 617. [Full Text] |
||||

