Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 10, 2145-2147,
October 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF
IVF Unit, German Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
Concern about the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in ovarian stimulation of poor responder IVF patients has arisen from the claim that GnRH agonists might have a direct deleterious effect through their receptors on the ovary. In this study, we compared two ovarian stimulation protocols in which no GnRH agonists were used. In all, 40 patients with a poor response in previous treatment cycles were included. They were divided into two groups: group I (n = 20) received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, without the addition of either GnRH agonist or antagonist; while group II (n = 20) patients received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, including the administration of a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix, 0.25 mg daily) during the late follicular phase. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for mean age, duration of infertility, baseline FSH concentration, cancellation rate, number of ampoules of gonadotrophin used, number of mature oocytes retrieved, oestradiol concentrations on the day of injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group II appeared higher than in group I, but were not significantly different (20 and 13.33% compared with 6.25 and 3.44% respectively). The addition of GnRH antagonists to ovarian stimulation protocols might be a new hope for poor responder IVF patients, but this report is preliminary and further controlled randomized prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required.
Key words: Cetrorelix/GnRH antagonist/IVF/poor responders/pregnancy
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Abdi Ipekci Cad, Azer Is Merkezi, No. 44, Nisantasi, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail: mbahceci{at}hotmail.com
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. Nelson, R. W. Yates, and R. Fleming Serum anti-Mullerian hormone and FSH: prediction of live birth and extremes of response in stimulated cycles implications for individualization of therapy Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2414 - 2421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.-P. Cheung, P.-M. Lam, I. H. Lok, T. T.-Y. Chiu, S.-Y. Yeung, C.-C. Tjer, and C. J. Haines GnRH antagonist versus long GnRH agonist protocol in poor responders undergoing IVF: a randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 616 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. El-Toukhy, Y. Khalaf, R. Hart, A. Taylor, and P. Braude Young age does not protect against the adverse effects of reduced ovarian reserve--an eight year study Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1519 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|