Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravhon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ravhon, A.
Right arrow Articles by Winston, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 11, 2297-2301, November 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Dynamic assays of inhibin B and oestradiol following buserelin acetate administration as predictors of ovarian response in IVF

Amir Ravhon1,4, Stuart Lavery1, Sappho Michael2, Mandy Donaldson3, Raul Margara1, Geoff Trew1 and Robert Winston1

1 IVF Unit, Department of Reproductive Medicine and Science 2 Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and 3 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

The study was designed to examine whether dynamic measurements of inhibin B and oestradiol following single administration of buserelin acetate were correlated with the ovarian response to stimulation in IVF. A total of 37 patients undergoing IVF treatment was studied when the long protocol was started in the early follicular phase. Blood samples were taken twice: on day 2 of the menstrual cycle, before the first s.c. administration of buserelin acetate 0.5 mg and on day 3, 24 h later. Inhibin B and oestradiol concentrations were compared with the ovarian response to stimulation. The ovarian response was defined in two ways: `number of oocytes/total recombinant (r) follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) dose'; and `square-root (number of follicles/total rFSH dose)'. The following measurements were highly correlated with the ovarian response to stimulation: increase in oestradiol (day 3–day 2 oestradiol concentration) [correlation coefficient (r) = 0.68, P < 0.0001] and sum of inhibin B (day 2 + day 3 inhibin B concentrations) (r = 0.6, P < 0.0001). Age and basal concentrations of FSH and inhibin B were inferior to the above measurements in terms of correlation with the ovarian response. In conclusion, dynamic measurements of inhibin B and oestradiol following single administration of buserelin acetate were highly correlated with the ovarian response to stimulation for IVF treatment.

Key words: GnRHa stimulation test/inhibin B/IVF/oestradiol/ovarian response

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kaplan Medical Centre, POB 1, Rehovot 76100, Israel. E-mail: aravhon{at}bezeqint.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. La Marca, S. Giulini, A. Tirelli, E. Bertucci, T. Marsella, S. Xella, and A. Volpe
Anti-Mullerian hormone measurement on any day of the menstrual cycle strongly predicts ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 766 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. McIlveen, J.D. Skull, and W.L. Ledger
Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 778 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Al-Qahtani and N. P. Groome
Anti-Mullerian Hormone: Cinderella Finds New Admirers.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2006; 91(10): 3760 - 3762.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Eldar-Geva, A. Ben-Chetrit, I. M. Spitz, R. Rabinowitz, E. Markowitz, T. Mimoni, M. Gal, E. Zylber-Haran, and E. J. Margalioth
Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3178 - 3183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Vujisic, F. Stipoljev, R. Bauman, R. Dmitrovic, and D. Jezek
Pericentric inversion of chromosome 2 in a patient with the empty follicle syndrome: Case report
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2552 - 2555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
F. P Hohmann, J. S E Laven, F. H de Jong, and B. C J M Fauser
Relationship between inhibin A and B, estradiol and follicle growth dynamics during ovarian stimulation in normo-ovulatory women
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 152(3): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
K. Lutchman Singh, M. Davies, and R. Chatterjee
Fertility in female cancer survivors: pathophysiology, preservation and the role of ovarian reserve testing
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 69 - 89.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Hendriks, F.J.M. Broekmans, L.F.J.M.M. Bancsi, F.H. de Jong, C.W.N. Looman, and E.R. te Velde
Repeated clomiphene citrate challenge testing in the prediction of outcome in IVF: a comparison with basal markers for ovarian reserve
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 163 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kwee, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, C.B. Lambalk, and J. Schoemaker
Intercycle variability of ovarian reserve tests: results of a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 590 - 595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Kwee, M.W. Elting, R. Schats, P.D. Bezemer, C.B. Lambalk, and J. Schoemaker
Comparison of endocrine tests with respect to their predictive value on the outcome of ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF treatment: results of a prospective randomized study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1422 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.J. Scheffer, F.J.M. Broekmans, C.W.N. Looman, M. Blankenstein, B.C.J.M. Fauser, F.H. de Jong, and E.R. te Velde
The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 700 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Y.K. Yong, D. T. Baird, K.J. Thong, A. S. McNeilly, and R. A. Anderson
Prospective analysis of the relationships between the ovarian follicle cohort and basal FSH concentration, the inhibin response to exogenous FSH and ovarian follicle number at different stages of the normal menstrual cycle and after pituitary down-regulation
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 35 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. Welt, Y. Sidis, H. Keutmann, and A. Schneyer
Activins, Inhibins, and Follistatins: From Endocrinology to Signaling. A Paradigm for the New Millennium
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2002; 227(9): 724 - 752.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Eldar-Geva, E.J. Margalioth, A. Ben-Chetrit, M. Gal, D.M. Robertson, D.L. Healy, Y.Z. Diamant, and I.M. Spitz
Serum inhibin B levels measured early during FSH administration for IVF may be of value in predicting the number of oocytes to be retrieved in normal and low responders
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2331 - 2337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Fawzy, A. Lambert, R.F. Harrison, P.G. Knight, N. Groome, B. Hennelly, and W.R. Robertson
Day 5 inhibin B levels in a treatment cycle are predictive of IVF outcome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1535 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.