Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nowshari, M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nowshari, M.A.
Right arrow Articles by Brem, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 12, 2577-2581, December 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Refreezing of murine intact and biopsied embryos by rapid-freezing procedure

M.A. Nowshari1,3 and G. Brem2

1 Interuniversitäres Forschungsinstitut für Agrarbiotechnologie, Tulln and 2 Ludwig Boltzmann Institute für immuno-, zyto- und molekulargenetische Forschung, Vienna, Austria

The in-vivo development of murine morula stage embryos frozen-thawed once or twice and embryos biopsied after one freezing cycle and refrozen was studied. Embryos (n = 860) were cryopreserved using a rapid-freezing procedure. At least 24 h after freezing, embryos were thawed and cultured in vitro for 3 h. In experiment I, morphologically intact embryos were either transferred (n = 180) into recipients or refrozen (n = 160). Unfrozen embryos (control group, n = 180) and refrozen embryos stored for at least 24 h and then thawed, were transferred into recipients. In experiment II, embryos frozen once were thawed and biopsied or sham-biopsied (n = 230 and 180 respectively) and refrozen (n = 226 and 179 respectively). They were thawed and transferred (n = 192 and 160 respectively) into recipients. Recipient mice were either killed on day 15 after embryo transfer and number of implantation sites and live fetuses recorded or pregnant recipients (n = 6, experiment II) were allowed to carry the fetuses to term. There was no difference in the survival rate of embryos at thawing between those frozen once or twice (91 versus 93%). The implantation rate and number of live fetuses in the pregnant recipients at necropsy among those transferred with unfrozen embryos (57% and 51%; 8/9), embryos frozen once (55% and 45%; 8/9) or twice (51% and 48%; 6/8) was not different. There was no difference in the survival rate of refrozen embryos biopsied or sham-biopsied after one freezing cycle (89 versus 87%). The implantation rate and number of live fetuses in pregnant animals transferred with biopsied or sham-biopsied embryos was not different (64 and 41% versus 57 and 37% respectively). All six pregnant animals allowed to carry the fetuses to term delivered normal live fetuses (n = 39). On mating 12 females with six males of the progeny born out of biopsied embryos, all became pregnant and delivered live fetuses. It may be concluded that murine biopsied and intact embryos can be successfully refrozen by rapid-freezing procedure.

Key words: biopsy/cryopreservation/mice/micromanipulation/refreezing

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Biotechnology in der Tierproduktion, Interuniversitäres Forschungsinstitut für Agrarbiotechnologie, Konrad Lorenz Str. 20, 3430-Tulln, Austria. E-mail: Nowshari{at}ifa-tulln.ac.at


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.A. Nowshari and G. Brem
Effect of freezing rate and exposure time to cryoprotectant on the development of mouse pronuclear stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2368 - 2373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.