Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R.H.F.
Right arrow Articles by Greve, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, R.H.F.
Right arrow Articles by Greve, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 2, 273-283, February 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Pre-ovulatory Graafian follicles are cooler than neighbouring stroma in pig ovaries

R.H.F. Hunter1,4, I.B. Bøgh1, N. Einer-Jensen2, S. Müller3 and T. Greve1

1 Department of Clinical Studies—Reproduction, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, 2 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology University of Southern Denmark, Odense and 3 Department of Molecular Animal Breeding and Genetics, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany

Using an infra-red camera, domestic pig ovaries were thermo-imaged almost instantaneously at laparotomy or within a closed abdomen by endoscopy. Rectal and jugular vein temperatures were recorded using thermo-probes. Graafian follicles (7–10 mm diameter) were cooler than ovarian stroma in all experimental models examined, and both compartments were cooler than rectal and jugular temperatures. The mean difference between follicles and stroma in 73 observations was 1.3 ± 0.1°C. When thermo-imaged under the fimbriated extremity of the Fallopian tube, follicles and stroma could still be distinguished. Follicles cooled slightly more rapidly than adjoining stroma during the first 10 s of a 60 s recording interval, after which curves for the two tissues remained parallel. Arresting ovarian blood supply for 5 min had a negligible influence on the temperature differentials. Endoscopy in three models recorded mean differentials between follicles and stroma of 0.6 ± 0.1°C to 1.1 ± 0.1°C. It is concluded that temperature gradients do exist in the ovarian tissues of mature animals, and that these are generated at least in part as a consequence of endothermic reactions within Graafian follicles.

Key words: counter-current heat exchange/endothermic reactions/follicular fluid/infra-red endoscopy/ovary/pig

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at:32 Gilmour Road, Edinburgh EH16 5NT, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ReproductionHome page
J Ye, J Coleman, M G Hunter, J Craigon, K H S Campbell, and M R Luck
Physiological temperature variants and culture media modify meiotic progression and developmental potential of pig oocytes in vitro
Reproduction, May 1, 2007; 133(5): 877 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Cicinelli, N. Einer-Jensen, P. Galantino, V. Pinto, B. Barba, and M. Tartagni
Model of counter-current transfer from vagina to urethra in postmenopausal women
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2496 - 2500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Einer-Jensen, E. Cicinelli, P. Galantino, V. Pinto, and B. Barba
Preferential vascular-based transfer from vagina to the corpus but not to the tubal part of the uterus in postmenopausal women
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1329 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.