Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Esterhuizen, A.D.
Right arrow Articles by van Rooyen, L.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Esterhuizen, A.D.
Right arrow Articles by van Rooyen, L.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 3, 657-661, March 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Sperm chromatin packaging as an indicator of in-vitro fertilization rates

A.D. Esterhuizen1, D.R. Franken2,3, J.G.H. Lourens1, E. Prinsloo1 and L.H. van Rooyen1

1 Andrology Laboratory, du Buisson and partners, Pretoria and 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Stellenbosch, Tygerberg, South Africa

The development of a sequential diagnostic schedule for patients consulting for infertility disturbances would be an ideal method of approach for clinicians in the absence of an aetiological or pathophysiological diagnosis. Since sperm morphology recorded by strict criteria has often been correlated with fertilization failure, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between normal morphology as well as in-vitro fertilization (IVF) rates, with chromatin staining among fertile and subfertile men. Two semen smears were prepared from each specimen obtained from 72 men to record normal morphology and chromatin packaging as recorded by chromomycin A3 (CMA3) staining. Following the semen analyses, the 72 men were divided into the two morphological groups, namely <4% and >4% normal forms. Significantly different percentages of CMA3 staining (mean ± SE) were recorded between the two morphological groups, namely 65.9% ± 3.5 and 44.5% ± 1.7 (P ± 0.001). A highly negative significant correlation existed between percentage of normal morphology as recorded by strict criteria and CMA3 staining. A highly significant and positive correlation was recorded for normal morphology and IVF rates (r ± 0.45, P ± 0.0001). A significant negative correlation (r ± –0.51, P ± 0.0001) existed between CMA3 values and IVF rates. The discriminating power of nuclear maturity, as recorded by CMA3 staining, to identify abnormal morphology values and poor IVF rates was calculated with receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.86 for sperm morphology and 0.74 for IVF rates. The calculated threshold values for CMA3 staining to distinguish between morphology groups were 48 and 50% for IVF. Chromatin packaging assessment is a valuable addition to the sequential diagnostic programme in an assisted reproductive arena.

Key words: IVF/morphology/sperm chromatin

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 3rd Floor, Tygerberg Hospital, Tygerberg, 7505, South Africa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Singleton, A. Zalensky, G.F. Doncel, M. Morshedi, and I.A. Zalenskaya
Testis/sperm-specific histone 2B in the sperm of donors and subfertile patients: variability and relation to chromatin packaging
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 743 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.R. Spermon, L. Ramos, A.M.M. Wetzels, C.G.J. Sweep, D.D.M. Braat, L.A.L.M. Kiemeney, and J.A. Witjes
Sperm integrity pre- and post-chemotherapy in men with testicular germ cell cancer
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1781 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
U. Paasch, R. K. Sharma, A. K. Gupta, S. Grunewald, E. J. Mascha, A. J. Thomas Jr, H.-J. Glander, and A. Agarwal
Cryopreservation and Thawing Is Associated with Varying Extent of Activation of Apoptotic Machinery in Subsets of Ejaculated Human Spermatozoa
Biol Reprod, December 1, 2004; 71(6): 1828 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gandini, F. Lombardo, D. Paoli, F. Caruso, P. Eleuteri, G. Leter, R. Ciriminna, F. Culasso, F. Dondero, A. Lenzi, et al.
Full-term pregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatin damage
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1409 - 1417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S.E.M. Lewis, M. O'Connell, M. Stevenson, L. Thompson-Cree, and N. McClure
An algorithm to predict pregnancy in assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1385 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Tomlinson, O. Moffatt, G.C. Manicardi, D. Bizzaro, M. Afnan, and D. Sakkas
Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2160 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Van den Broecke, J. Van der Elst, J. Liu, O. Hovatta, and M. Dhont
The female-to-male transsexual patient: a source of human ovarian cortical tissue for experimental use
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2001; 16(1): 145 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Sakkas, G.C. Manicardi, M. Tomlinson, M. Mandrioli, D. Bizzaro, P.G. Bianchi, and U. Bianchi
The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 1112 - 1116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.