Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 4, 798-805,
April 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
A qualitative follow-up study of women's experiences with oocyte donation
1 Bioethics Institute, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, and 2 Division of Human Nutrition, Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
Oocyte donation is growing at an exponential rate. Currently, thousands of women donate each year. The health services that donors receive deserve evaluation. Thirty-three former donors were recruited from IVF clinics, a matching agency, the Internet, advertisements, and word of mouth. In-depth interviews were conducted to learn what motivated the donation, to determine how satisfied donors were with the experience and what issues played a role in donor satisfaction, and to identify recommendations to improve the process. None of the participants regretted their decision to donate, but they were not always completely satisfied with the donation experience. The physical process, compensation, quality of medical care, and level of involvement in the process were the primary factors that affected satisfaction. Matching agencies and IVF clinics may improve donor satisfaction by: minimizing trips to the clinic; using protocols that limit the number of intramuscular injections; reducing the risk of hyperstimulation syndrome; providing follow-up care; reimbursing for expenses such as lost work, travel, and child care; separating direct reimbursements from `income' to decrease the amount of taxes donors must pay on compensation; treating donors with respect and appreciation; and informing them about the outcome. Improved donor satisfaction is likely to improve donor recruitment and retention.
Key words: evaluation/oocyte donation/qualitative research/satisfaction
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Bioethics Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Suite 511, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. Purewal and O.B.A van den Akker A study of the effect of message framing on oocyte donation Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2009; 24(12): 3136 - 3143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Purewal and O.B.A. van den Akker Systematic review of oocyte donation: investigating attitudes, motivations and experiences Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2009; 15(5): 499 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Yee, J. A. Hitkari, and E. M. Greenblatt A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 2040 - 2050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Mertes and G. Pennings Oocyte donation for stem cell research Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 629 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. E. Zweifel, M. A. Rathert, S. C. Klock, H. P. Walaski, E. A. Pritts, D. L. Olive, and S. R. Lindheim Comparative assessment of pre- and post-donation attitudes towards potential oocyte and embryo disposition and management among ovum donors in an oocyte donation programme Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2006; 21(5): 1325 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. van den Akker A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 91 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. S. Svanberg, C. Lampic, T. Bergh, and O. Lundkvist Characterization of potential oocyte donors in Sweden Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 2205 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Blyth Subsidized IVF: the development of 'egg sharing' in the UK Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3254 - 3259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Caligara, J. Navarro, G. Vargas, C. Simon, A. Pellicer, and J. Remohi The effect of repeated controlled ovarian stimulation in donors Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2320 - 2323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|