Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S.W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ngai, S.W.
Right arrow Articles by Ho, P.C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1159-1162, May 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion up to 9 weeks of gestation: efficacy and acceptability

S.W. Ngai1, O.S. Tang, Y.M. Chan and P.C. Ho

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong SAR, China

Misoprostol and mifepristone have been shown to be effective for medical abortion up to 9 weeks of gestation. When used alone, the successful complete abortion rate dropped to ~60%. It has been demonstrated that by adding water to misoprostol, the success rate rose to 92%. This is the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of misoprostol and water versus misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion in women at <= 9 weeks of gestation. Eighty women were randomly assigned to group 1 (water added to misoprostol) and group 2 (misoprostol alone). Vaginal misoprostol 800 µg was given on days 1, 3 and 5. If the woman did not require vacuum aspiration during the period up to the return of first menstruation after medical abortion, the outcome was classified as complete abortion. The incidence of side-effects and the acceptability were assessed through a standardized questionnaire during and after the abortion. The complete abortion rate appeared higher when water was added but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Gastro-intestinal side-effects were common but well tolerated in both groups. Overall, 40% of the women preferred a surgical method in the future because of the high failure rate. With an overall complete abortion rate of 85%, it is probably not a clinically acceptable method even if the addition of water can improve the results. We conclude that the addition of water onto misoprostol tablets does not improve its efficacy in first trimester medical abortion. Misoprostol alone is not recommended for medical abortion (up to 9 weeks of pregnancy) because of the high failure rate and low acceptability.

Key words: abortion/medical/misoprostol

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, C. C.W. Chan, E. H.Y. Ng, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2003; 18(11): 2315 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
K.A. Zikopoulos, E.G. Papanikolaou, S.N. Kalantaridou, G.D. Tsanadis, N.I. Plachouras, N.A. Dalkalitsis, and E.A. Paraskevaidis
Early pregnancy termination with vaginal misoprostol before and after 42 days gestation
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3079 - 3083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, J. Xu, L. Cheng, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
Pilot study on the use of sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone in termination of first trimester pregnancy up to 9 weeks gestation
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1738 - 1740.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
J. K. Jain, C. Dutton, B. Harwood, K. R. Meckstroth, and D. R. Mishell Jr
A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1477 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, B.Y. Miao, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
Pilot study on the use of repeated doses of sublingual misoprostol in termination of pregnancy up to 12 weeks gestation: efficacy and acceptability
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2002; 17(3): 654 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
O. S. Tang, H. Schweer, H.W. Seyberth, S. W.H. Lee, and P. C. Ho
Pharmacokinetics of different routes of administration of misoprostol
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 332 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
A. B. Goldberg, M. B. Greenberg, and P. D. Darney
Misoprostol and Pregnancy
N. Engl. J. Med., January 4, 2001; 344(1): 38 - 47.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
B. Harwood, D. R. Mishell Jr, S. W. Ngai, Y. M. Chan, P. C. Ho, and O. S. Tang
Use of vaginal misoprostol for abortion
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2686 - 2688.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.