Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Järvelä, I.
Right arrow Articles by Martikainen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Järvelä, I.
Right arrow Articles by Martikainen, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 6, 1247-1249, June 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Ovulation side and cycle fecundity: a retrospective analysis of frozen/thawed embryo transfer cycles

I. Järvelä1,3, S. Nuojua-Huttunen2 and H. Martikainen1

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oulu University Hospital, FIN-90220 Oulu and 2 The Infertility Clinic of Oulu, the Family Federation of Finland, Finland

The aim of the study was to evaluate a possible lateral difference in ovarian activity and its effect on cycle fecundity. A database was analysed retrospectively which covered 477 cycles in which frozen/thawed embryo transfer had been carried out. The cycles were spontaneous, with no hormonal treatment. Women with ovulation problems as a reason for infertility treatment were excluded. Factors investigated were the side of ovulation, endometrial thickness on cycle days 10–12 and on the day of embryo transfer, and pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. Ovulation was right-sided in 273 of the 477 cycles (57.2%) and left-sided in 204 of the cycles (42.8%) (95% CI 38.3–47.2, P = 0.002). In the age category of 30–37 years, covering 288 cycles, the incidence of left-sided ovulation was 126 (43.7%, 95% CI 38.0–49.5, P = 0.034). In this category, the endometrial thickness (±SD) was significantly greater on the day of embryo transfer (i.e. at time of implantation) when there had been left-sided ovulation compared with right-sided [9.6 mm (2.0) versus 9.1 mm (1.8), P = 0.037]. In addition, the pregnancy rate per embryo transfer was higher when ovulation had been on the left side [32/126 (25.2%) versus right side 24/162 (14.8%), P = 0.035, 95% CI 0.0122–0.199]. In conclusion, right-sided ovulation was more frequent than left-sided in the whole group. This is the first study to report that the side of ovulation has a clinical impact. These data support the hypothesis that the side of ovulation is significant in terms of embryo implantation.

Key words: cycle fecundity/endometrial thickness/frozen-thawed embryo transfer/ovulation side/pregnancy rate

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Oulu University Hospital, FIN-90220 Oulu, Finland. E-mail: ijarvela{at}cc.oulu.fi


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Chapron, N. Chopin, B. Borghese, H. Foulot, B. Dousset, M. C. Vacher-Lavenu, M. Vieira, W. Hasan, and A. Bricou
Deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomical distribution
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1839 - 1845.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Fukuda, K. Fukuda, C. Y. Andersen, and A. G. Byskov
Characteristics of human ovulation in natural cycles correlated with age and achievement of pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2501 - 2507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.