Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by The European Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Study Group,
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by The European Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Study Group,
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 7, 1446-1451, July 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Induction of final follicular maturation and early luteinization in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproduction treatment—recombinant HCG versus urinary HCG

The European Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin Study Group

Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence: E.Loumaye, Ares-Serono Scientific and Medical Communication Department, 15 bis Chemin des Mines, CH-1202 Geneva, Switzerland

This multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and safety of recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin (rHCG) (Ovidrel®) and urinary HCG (uHCG) (Profasi®) for inducing final follicular maturation and early luteinization in women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproduction treatment. Following long down-regulation and stimulation with recombinant human FSH (rFSH) (Gonal-F®), a total of 190 women received a single, s.c. injection of either 250 µg rHCG or 5000 IU uHCG. For evaluable patients (n = 172), the mean number of oocytes retrieved per patient (primary efficacy endpoint) was 11.6 for rHCG and 10.6 for uHCG (not significant). The mean number of mature oocytes was statistically higher (P = 0.027) for the rHCG group than the uHCG (9.4 versus 7.1). Serum progesterone concentrations on day 1 and days 6–7 post-HCG, and serum HCG concentrations at all post-HCG time points were statistically significantly in favour of rHCG. The clinical pregnancy rate was somewhat higher (not significant) in the rHCG group (33 versus 25%) as was the live birth rate (27 versus 23%, not significant). Both treatments were well tolerated, though the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the uHCG group (45.1 versus 22.7%, P = 0.0004). The incidence of injection-site reactions was significantly lower in the rHCG group (P = 0.0001). In conclusion, for triggering ovulation, rHCG seems to have significant advantages compared with uHCG in terms of number of mature oocytes retrieved, luteal progesterone and local tolerance.

Key words: follicular maturation/IVF/ovulation induction/rHCG/uHCG

The following staff from Ares-Serono Reproductive Health Clinical Development Unit contributed to the conception, conduct and analysis of the study: L.Maislisch, D.Warne, S.Bologna, E.Loumaye. The following clinical investigators participated in the conception and conduct of the study: J.Bellaisch-Allart, Service de Gynécologie et Obstétrique, Hôpital Jean Rostand, Sèvres, France; P.Dellenbach, Service de Gynécologie et Obstétrique, 19, rue Louis Pasteur, Schiltigheim, France; F.A.Leidenberger, Gemeinschaftspraxis, Hamburg, Germany; M.Scholtes, Gemeinschaftspraxis, Dusseldorf, Germany; R.Fischer, Fertility Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; B.Fisch, IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beilison Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; G.B.Melis, Instituto di Ginecologia, Ostetricia & Fisiopatologia della Umana, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; J.L.H.Evers, Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands; M.Wikland, Fertilitetcentrum AB, Gothenburg, Sweden; J.Mills, Assisted Conception Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H. Al-Inany, M. A. Aboulghar, R. T. Mansour, and M. Proctor
Recombinant versus urinary gonadotrophins for triggering ovulation in assisted conception
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2061 - 2073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. C. W. Chan, E. H. Y. Ng, O. S. Tang, W. S. B. Yeung, E. Y. L. Lau, and P. C. Ho
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Compare Two Doses of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in Inducing Final Oocyte Maturity and the Hormonal Profile during the Luteal Phase
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 3933 - 3938.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.-C. Arce, A. Nyboe Andersen, and J. Collins
Resolving methodological and clinical issues in the design of efficacy trials in assisted reproductive technologies: a mini-review
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1757 - 1771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. G. M. Beckers, N. S. Macklon, M. J. Eijkemans, M. Ludwig, R. E. Felberbaum, K. Diedrich, S. Bustion, E. Loumaye, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
Nonsupplemented Luteal Phase Characteristics after the Administration of Recombinant Human Chorionic Gonadotropin, Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone, or Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonist to Induce Final Oocyte Maturation in in Vitro Fertilization Patients after Ovarian Stimulation with Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone and GnRH Antagonist Cotreatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4186 - 4192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Filicori and G. E. Cognigni
Roles and Novel Regimens of Luteinizing Hormone and Follicle-Stimulating Hormone in Ovulation Induction
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1437 - 1441.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.