Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olivennes, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Olivennes, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1663-1665, August 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Debate continued

Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART

Double trouble: yes a twin pregnancy is an adverse outcome

François Olivennes1

ART unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital A.Béclère, Clamart, France

The frequency of twins has increased by 30% between 1972 and 1990 in France, USA and England (Tuppin et al., 1993Go; Luke et al., 1994; Dunn et al., 1996). Twin pregnancies represented a mean of 24.7% of IVF pregnancies as reported in the last World Collaborative Report on IVF (De Mouzon and Lancaster, 1997Go). In some IVF centres this rate can be as high as 40–50% as seen regularly in meeting presentations.

Almost no large scale data are available to assess with precision the exact rate of twins in ovarian stimulation outside IVF. A study carried in France in 1993, showed that 63% of twin pregnancies originated from ovarian stimulation, 19.5% after IVF and 43.5% without IVF (Blondel et al., 1996Go).

Triplet pregnancies (or pregnancies of higher order) are clearly considered as the major adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Selective embryo . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Maternal morbidity and mortality

Higher maternal mortality
Higher maternal morbidity
Perinatal outcome

Greater prematurity
Lower birth weight
Higher neonatal mortality
Greater number of handicaps
More malformations
Psychological consequences

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. A. Roberts, C. T. Fitzgerald, and D. R. Brison
Modelling the impact of single embryo transfer in a national health service IVF programme
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2009; 24(1): 122 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
V. Savasi, E. Ferrazzi, C. Lanzani, M. Oneta, B. Parrilla, and T. Persico
Safety of sperm washing and ART outcome in 741 HIV-1-serodiscordant couples
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2007; 22(3): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. S. Daftary and H. S. Taylor
Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 331 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.C. Hunault, J.D.F. Habbema, M.J.C. Eijkemans, J.A. Collins, J.L.H. Evers, and E.R. te Velde
Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2019 - 2026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. P.A. Van Montfoort, J. C.M. Dumoulin, A. D.M. Kester, and J. L.H. Evers
Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2103 - 2108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. K. Min, S. A. Breheny, V. MacLachlan, and D. L. Healy
What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The singleton, term gestation, live birth rate per cycle initiated: the BESST endpoint for assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 3 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont
Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.R. Hernandez
Avoiding multiple pregnancies: sailing uncharted seas
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 615 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Pennings
Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Multiple pregnancies: a test case for the moral quality of medically assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2466 - 2469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]