Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Study Team, t. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ford, W.C.L.
Right arrow Articles by Study Team, t. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1703-1708, August 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Increasing paternal age is associated with delayed conception in a large population of fertile couples: evidence for declining fecundity in older men

W.C.L. Ford1,4, Kate North2, Hazel Taylor2, Alexandra Farrow3, M.G.R. Hull1, Jean Golding2 and the ALSPAC StudyTeam,2

1 Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2 Division of Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, University of Bristol, Bristol and 3 Brunel University, Department of Health Studies, Middlesex, UK

The impact of male age on fecundity remains controversial. Here, a large population study was used to investigate the effect of paternal age on time to conception. All couples in the Avon Health district expecting a baby between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992 were eligible. Questionnaires completed by both the man and the woman at 18 weeks gestation covered specific fertility factors, e.g. parity, paternity, cohabitation and oral contraception; and non-specific factors, e.g. educational achievement, housing, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity. Logistic regression was used to identify factors independently related to conception in <=6 or <=12 months. Of 8515 planned pregnancies, 74% were conceived in <=6 months, 14% in the second 6 months and 12% after more than a year. Nine variables, including the age of the woman, were independently related to time to conception. After adjustment for these, the likelihood of conception within 6 or 12 months was lower in older men. Compared to men <25 years old, the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for conception in <=12 months were 0.62 (0.40, 0.98), 0.50 (0.31, 0.81) and 0.51 (0.31, 0.86) in men aged 30–34, 35–39 and >=40 years respectively.

Key words: fecundity/fertility/male age/time to conception

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: University Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EG, UK. E-mail: chris.ford{at}bristol.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
G. A. Sartorius and E. Nieschlag
Paternal age and reproduction
Hum. Reprod. Update, August 20, 2009; (2009) dmp027v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. A. Wise, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. R. Palmer, R. N. Hoover, E. E. Hatch, K. M. Perez, W. C. Strohsnitter, R. Kaufman, D. Anderson, and R. Troisi
Time to Pregnancy and Secondary Sex Ratio in Men Exposed Prenatally to Diethylstilbestrol
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 166(7): 765 - 774.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. H Balen and A. J Rutherford
Management of infertility
BMJ, September 22, 2007; 335(7620): 608 - 611.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
B. H. Lewis, M. Legato, and H. Fisch
Medical Implications of the Male Biological Clock.
JAMA, November 15, 2006; 296(19): 2369 - 2371.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B. Kuhnert and E. Nieschlag
Reproductive functions of the ageing male
Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2004; 10(4): 327 - 339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
E. De La Rochebrochard, K. Mcelreavey, and P. Thonneau
Paternal Age Over 40 Years: The "Amber Light" in the Reproductive Life of Men?
J Androl, July 1, 2003; 24(4): 459 - 465.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Eskenazi, A.J. Wyrobek, E. Sloter, S.A. Kidd, L. Moore, S. Young, and D. Moore
The association of age and semen quality in healthy men
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 447 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Farrow, M.G.R. Hull, K. Northstone, H. Taylor, W.C.L. Ford, and J. Golding
Prolonged use of oral contraception before a planned pregnancy is associated with a decreased risk of delayed conception
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2754 - 2761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Murphy, G.M. Stirrat, and J. Heron
The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1914 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. de La Rochebrochard and P. Thonneau
Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage; results of a multicentre European study
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1649 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. B. Dunson, B. Colombo, and D. D. Baird
Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1399 - 1403.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sallmen and R. Luukkonen
Is the observed association between increasing paternal age and delayed conception an artefact?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 2027 - 2028.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.