Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (103)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magli, M.C.
Right arrow Articles by Trounson, A.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magli, M.C.
Right arrow Articles by Trounson, A.O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1781-1786, August 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro

M.C. Magli1, G.M. Jones2, L. Gras3, L. Gianaroli1, I. Korman4 and A.O. Trounson2,5

1 SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini, 12, 40138, Bologna, Italy, 2 Centre for Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, 27–31 Wright Street, Clayton, Victoria, 3 Monash IVF, Monash Private Surgical Hospital, Clayton Road, Clayton, Victoria and 4 Monash IVF Gold Coast, Allamanda Medical Centre, Southport, Queensland, Australia

In all, 143 human embryos obtained 3 days (day 3) after insemination or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) were biopsied and a single nucleated cell removed for identification of aneuploidy by fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Fifty-one per cent of embryos were aneuploid and significantly more aneuploid embryos blocked in further development to morulae and blastocysts than euploid embryos (59 versus 34%; P < 0.001). Chromosomal analysis of the generated blastocysts revealed 40% were aneuploid (16 of 40 generated blastocysts). Re-examination of cells by FISH for the same chromosome probes of the inner cell mass (ICM) of expanded and hatching blastocysts derived from the aneuploid embryos revealed a high incidence of mosaicism of ICM cell lineages that were usually predictable from observations of day 3 single-cell biopsies. These data would not support the hypothesis of a preferential allocation of euploid cells to the ICM and aneuploid cells to the trophectoderm. A high concordance between day 3 aneuploidy diagnosis and ICM cell lineages was observed with trisomies (97%), and multiple complex chromosome numerical abnormalities (100%). A reduced concordance was observed with monosomies (65%) and haploidy (18%). Concomitantly, the proportion of ICM cell lineages was increased in blastocysts whose chromosomal condition was diagnosed as haploid (21%) or with complex numerical abnormalities (50%).

Key words: aneuploidy/blastocyst/chromosomal mosaicism/embryo biopsy/inner cell mass cells

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Early Human Development, Monash Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, 27–31 Wright Street, Clayton, Victoria, Australia 3168. E-mail: alan.trounson{at}med.monash.edu.au


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, M. Lemseffer, R. Bidault, O. Gasnier, M.H. Saussereau, V. Cadoret, C. Jamet, and D. Royere
Single Day 2 embryo versus blastocyst-stage transfer: a prospective study integrating fresh and frozen embryo transfers
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, W. Verpoest, P. Donoso, P. Haentjens, J. Van der Elst, I. Liebaers, and P. Devroey
Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2008; 23(12): 2818 - 2825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Fragouli, M. Lenzi, R. Ross, M. Katz-Jaffe, W.B. Schoolcraft, and D. Wells
Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2596 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. M. Jones, D. S. Cram, B. Song, G. Kokkali, K. Pantos, and A. O. Trounson
Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 1748 - 1759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Mantzouratou, A. Mania, E. Fragouli, L. Xanthopoulou, S. Tashkandi, K. Fordham, D.M. Ranieri, A. Doshi, S. Nuttall, J.C. Harper, et al.
Variable aneuploidy mechanisms in embryos from couples with poor reproductive histories undergoing preimplantation genetic screening
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2007; 22(7): 1844 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Kokkali, J. Traeger-Synodinos, C. Vrettou, D. Stavrou, G.M. Jones, D.S. Cram, E. Makrakis, A.O. Trounson, E. Kanavakis, and K. Pantos
Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1443 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, M. Lappi, E. Borghi, and B. Ermini
Oocyte euploidy, pronuclear zygote morphology and embryo chromosomal complement
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 241 - 249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Michiels, E. Van Assche, I. Liebaers, A. Van Steirteghem, and C. Staessen
The analysis of one or two blastomeres for PGD using fluorescence in-situ hybridization
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2396 - 2402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, E. M. Kolibianakis, L. Van Landuyt, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos.
N. Engl. J. Med., March 16, 2006; 354(11): 1139 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, E. Martini, I. van den Berg, N.S. Macklon, R-J.H. Galjaard, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and D. Van Opstal
Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 223 - 233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. G. Papanikolaou, E. D'haeseleer, G. Verheyen, H. Van de Velde, M. Camus, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye
Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3198 - 3203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. Wells, M.G. Bermudez, N. Steuerwald, A.R. Thornhill, D.L. Walker, H. Malter, J.D.A. Delhanty, and J. Cohen
Expression of genes regulating chromosome segregation, the cell cycle and apoptosis during human preimplantation development
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1339 - 1348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
L. Gianaroli, M. C. Magli, and A. P. Ferraretti
Sperm and Blastomere Aneuploidy Detection in Reproductive Genetics and Medicine
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2005; 53(3): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Daphnis, J.D.A. Delhanty, S. Jerkovic, J. Geyer, I. Craft, and J.C. Harper
Detailed FISH analysis of day 5 human embryos reveals the mechanisms leading to mosaic aneuploidy
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 129 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Schwarzler, H. Zech, M. Auer, K. Pfau, G. Gobel, P. Vanderzwalmen, and N. Zech
Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2097 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. Shi, F. Dirim, E. Wolf, V. Zakhartchenko, and T. Haaf
Methylation Reprogramming and Chromosomal Aneuploidy in In Vivo Fertilized and Cloned Rabbit Preimplantation Embryos
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 340 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.B. Baart, D. Van Opstal, F.J. Los, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and E. Martini
Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of two blastomeres from day 3 frozen-thawed embryos followed by analysis of the remaining embryo on day 5
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 685 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, J. C.M. Dumoulin, L. C.P. van Wissen, M. Bras, M. Janssen, J. L.H. Evers, and J. P.M. Geraedts
Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2004; 19(2): 316 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
F. J. Los, D. Van Opstal, and C. van den Berg
The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 79 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. G. Derhaag, E. Coonen, M. Bras, J.M. Bergers Janssen, R. Ignoul-Vanvuchelen, J. P.M. Geraedts, J. L.H. Evers, and J. C.M. Dumoulin
Chromosomally abnormal cells are not selected for the extra-embryonic compartment of the human preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2565 - 2574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Hardarson, G. Caisander, A. Sjogren, C. Hanson, L. Hamberger, and K. Lundin
A morphological and chromosomal study of blastocysts developing from morphologically suboptimal human pre-embryos compared with control blastocysts
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2003; 18(2): 399 - 407.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Rubio, C. Simon, F. Vidal, L. Rodrigo, T. Pehlivan, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer
Chromosomal abnormalities and embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Emiliani, E. Gonzalez-Merino, M. Van den Bergh, D. Delneste, Y. Englert, and M. Abramowicz
Correlation between fluorescence in-situ hybridization analyses and in-vitro development to blastocyst stage of embryos from Robertsonian translocation (13;14) carriers
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2957 - 2962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. J. Bean, T. J. Hassold, L. Judis, and P. A. Hunt
Fertilization in vitro increases non-disjunction during early cleavage divisions in a mouse model system
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2362 - 2367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Ebner, M. Moser, M. Sommergruber, C. Yaman, U. Pfleger, and G. Tews
First polar body morphology and blastocyst formation rate in ICSI patients
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2415 - 2418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Bielanska, S. L. Tan, and A. Ao
Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 413 - 419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Sandalinas, S. Sadowy, M. Alikani, G. Calderon, J. Cohen, and S. Munne
Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1954 - 1958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. D. Fisch, H. Rodriguez, R. Ross, G. Overby, and G. Sher
The Graduated Embryo Score (GES) predicts blastocyst formation and pregnancy rate from cleavage-stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2001; 16(9): 1970 - 1975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.