Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Royen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Right arrow Articles by Van Royen, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 15, No. 9, 1884-1888, September 2000
© 2000 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology


Debates Continued

Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART

A plea for single embryo transfer

Jan Gerris1 and Eric Van Royen

Fertility Centre Middelheim, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium

Abstract

It has been generally accepted that triplets after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) can and should be avoided by adopting a standard strategy of replacing no more than two embryos. However, there is an increasing awareness of the risks and costs and of the epidemic size of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI. This has resulted in efforts to replace no more than one embryo. However, this approach has been hampered by our relative inability to identify embryos with a very high implantation potential. To identify such embryos, a number of strategies are being considered, both at the two pronuclear (2PN), early cleavage and the blastocyst stages. At the 2PN stage, the polarity characteristics of the nucleoli have been shown to be correlated with a high implantation rate. Similarly, the morphological characteristics at day 2 and 3 have been used to describe top quality embryos in ~75% of all IVF/ICSI cycles. Blastocyst culture has resulted in very high implantation rates in the hands of some authors. No approach has shown its superiority at present, but initial experience with single embryo transfer (SET) at the early cleavage stage by Scandinavian and Belgian groups shows that an ongoing pregnancy rate of 35% and more can be achieved. Proper identification of patients at risk of a twin pregnancy after double embryo transfer is equally important. It is clear that mainly young patients (aged <34 years) during their first, perhaps first two, IVF/ICSI cycles constitute the main population at risk (responsible for >80% of all twins) and are the main target group for twin prevention by SET of a top quality embryo at whatever stage. Therefore, in our opinion, although a further fine-tuning of both embryo and patient characteristics relating to a high risk for (twin) pregnancy is desirable, SET should be introduced carefully and progressively in each IVF/ICSI programme from now on. Correct counselling is very important and both public and private insurers will have to join in the discussion.

Key words: ART/single embryo transfer/multiple pregnancies

Notes

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fertility Centre Middelheim, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium.E-mail: jan.gerris{at}ocmw.antwerpen.be

This debate was previously published on Webtrack, June 26, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. Ombelet, I. Cooke, S. Dyer, G. Serour, and P. Devroey
Infertility and the provision of infertility medical services in developing countries
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2008; 14(6): 605 - 621.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.G. Vergouw, L.L. Botros, P. Roos, J.W. Lens, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, D.H. Burns, and C.B Lambalk
Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Golombok, F. Olivennes, C. Ramogida, J. Rust, T. Freeman, and The Follow-Up Team
Parenting and the psychological development of a representative sample of triplets conceived by assisted reproduction
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2896 - 2902.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Poikkeus, M. Gissler, L. Unkila-Kallio, C. Hyden-Granskog, and A. Tiitinen
Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2007; 22(4): 1073 - 1079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, I. Delbaere, J. Gerris, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, J. Van der Elst, M. Temmerman, and M. Dhont
Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. S. Daftary and H. S. Taylor
Endocrine Regulation of HOX Genes
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2006; 27(4): 331 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Gleicher and D. Barad
The relative myth of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1337 - 1344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J.C. Eijkemans, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, C. de Klerk, J.D.F. Habbema, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Comparison of different treatment strategies in IVF with cumulative live birth over a given period of time as the primary end-point: methodological considerations on a randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 344 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Pelinck, N.E.A. Vogel, A. Hoek, E.G.J.M. Arts, A.H.M. Simons, and M.J. Heineman
Minimal stimulation IVF with late follicular phase administration of the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix and concomitant substitution with recombinant FSH: a pilot study
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 642 - 648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens
Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Ledee-Bataille, F. Olivennes, J. Kadoch, S. Dubanchet, N. Frydman, G. Chaouat, and R. Frydman
Detectable levels of interleukin-18 in uterine luminal secretions at oocyte retrieval predict failure of the embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 1968 - 1973.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.-L. Windt, T.F. Kruger, K. Coetzee, and C.J. Lombard
Comparative analysis of pregnancy rates after the transfer of early dividing embryos versus slower dividing embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1155 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. Jain, S. A. Missmer, and M. D. Hornstein
Trends in Embryo-Transfer Practice and in Outcomes of the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States
N. Engl. J. Med., April 15, 2004; 350(16): 1639 - 1645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
S. Maslovitz, Y. Yaron, G. Fait, I. Gull, I. Wolman, A. Jaffa, and J. Hartoov
Feasibility of Nuchal Translucency in Triplet Pregnancies
J. Ultrasound Med., April 1, 2004; 23(4): 501 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.A. Blake, M. Proctor, and N.P. Johnson
The merits of blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer: a Cochrane review
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 795 - 807.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Murray, A. Shetty, A. Rattray, V. Taylor, and S. Bhattacharya
A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 911 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Tummers, P. D. Sutter, and M. Dhont
Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2003; 18(8): 1720 - 1723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Rienzi, F. Ubaldi, M. Iacobelli, S. Ferrero, M. G. Minasi, F. Martinez, J. Tesarik, and E. Greco
Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1852 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
R. M. Schultz and C. J. Williams
The Science of ART
Science, June 21, 2002; 296(5576): 2188 - 2190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
F. Guerif, F. Fourquet, H. Marret, M.-H. Saussereau, C. Barthelemy, C. Lecomte, P. Lecomte, J. Lansac, and D. Royere
Cohort follow-up of couples with primary infertility in an ART programme using frozen donor semen
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1525 - 1531.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Fenwick, P. Platteau, A.P. Murdoch, and M. Herbert
Time from insemination to first cleavage predicts developmental competence of human preimplantation embryos in vitro
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 407 - 412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.R. Hernandez
Avoiding multiple pregnancies: sailing uncharted seas
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 615 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
ESHRE Campus Course Report
Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 790 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.