Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pandian, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pandian, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Templeton, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 12, 2593-2597, December 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review

Zabeena Pandian,1, Siladitya Bhattacharya and Allan Templeton

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK

BACKGROUND: Increased maternal and fetal risks have been reported in pregnancies following unexplained infertility. Our aims were to examine the obstetric and perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies in couples with unexplained infertility and explore the impact of fertility treatment. METHODS: Women with unexplained infertility were identified from the Aberdeen Fertility Clinic Database. Their unit numbers were matched against the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND) in order to extract obstetric records of those women with subsequent pregnancy outcomes. The general obstetric population served as a control group. RESULTS: Women with unexplained infertility were older [30.8 versus 27.9 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) for difference = +2.4 to +3.4] and more likely to be primiparous (59 versus 40%, 95% CI = +1.3 to +1.9). After adjusting for age and parity they had a higher incidence of pre-eclampsia, abruptio placentae, preterm labour, emergency Caesarean section and induction of labour in comparison with the general population (P < 0.05). Perinatal outcome did not differ between women with unexplained infertility and those of the general population. The multiple pregnancy rate was 5.4% higher following fertility treatment than in women who conceived spontaneously (95% CI = +2.8 to +9.7). CONCLUSIONS: Women with unexplained infertility are at higher risk of obstetric complications which persist even after adjusting for age, parity and fertility treatment. The reasons are however unclear and merit further study.

Key words: obstetric outcome/perinatal outcome/treatment-independent/treatment-related/unexplained infertility

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: z.pandian{at}abdn.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
W. Shih, D.D. Rushford, H. Bourne, C. Garrett, J.C. McBain, D.L. Healy, and H.W.G. Baker
Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1644 - 1653.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Maheshwari, M. Hamilton, and S. Bhattacharya
Effect of female age on the diagnostic categories of infertility
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 538 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2006: Evidence and Evolution
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 515 - 526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, O. Lidegaard, N. la Cour Freiesleben, and A. N. Andersen
Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2707 - 2714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I. A. Brosens, P. De Sutter, T. Hamerlynck, L. Imeraj, Z. Yao, B. Cloke, J. J. Brosens, and M. Dhont
Endometriosis is associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1725 - 1729.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G.H. Woldringh, M.H.A. Frunt, J.A.M. Kremer, and M.E.A. Spaanderman
Decreased ovarian reserve relates to pre-eclampsia in IVF/ICSI pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2948 - 2954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. De Sutter, I. Delbaere, J. Gerris, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, J. Van der Elst, M. Temmerman, and M. Dhont
Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2633 - 2637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers
The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
A. Pinborg
IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention
Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Pinborg, O. Lidegaard, N. la Cour Freiesleben, and A. N. Andersen
Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2821 - 2829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
B. Horsthemke and M. Ludwig
Assisted reproduction: the epigenetic perspective
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2005; 11(5): 473 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
M Ludwig, A Katalinic, S Gross, A Sutcliffe, R Varon, and B Horsthemke
Increased prevalence of imprinting defects in patients with Angelman syndrome born to subfertile couples
J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2005; 42(4): 289 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Paz, A. Amit, and H. Yavetz
Case Report: Pregnancy outcome following ICSI of oocytes with abnormal cytoplasm and zona pellucida
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2004; 19(3): 586 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. M Helmerhorst, D. A M Perquin, D. Donker, and M. J N C Keirse
Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies
BMJ, January 31, 2004; 328(7434): 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Porter, S. Bhattacharya, E. van Teijlingen, and A. Templeton
Does Caesarean section cause infertility?
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2003; 18(10): 1983 - 1986.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
O. Basso, C. R. Weinberg, D. D. Baird, A. J. Wilcox, and J. Olsen
Subfecundity as a Correlate of Preeclampsia: A Study within the Danish National Birth Cohort
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 157(3): 195 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Porter and S. Bhattacharya
Caesarean Section and subfertility
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 217 - 217.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.J. Murphy, G.M. Stirrat, and J. Heron
The relationship between Caesarean section and subfertility in a population-based sample of 14 541 pregnancies
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1914 - 1917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.