Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 2, 326-332,
February 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model
Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology-Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
For optimal embryo selection in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), knowledge of the implantation potential is essential. This is a retrospective analysis of morphological characteristics and cleavage kinetics of day 3 embryos resulting in an objective assessment of the relative implantation potential of each distinct type of embryo. Therefore transferred embryos were sampled according to their documented implantation behaviour: all embryos without any implantation on the one hand and all those with 100% ongoing implantation on the other. There were 213 such embryos in the latter group of which only seven (3%) had >20% fragmentation and only one embryo (0.5%) showed multinucleation (an embryo containing >20% fragmentation). For this reason, only embryos with
20% fragmentation and without multinucleation were analysed. They were split up according to the amount of fragmentation and the number of blastomeres on day 2 and on day 3. For each type, the implanted fraction was calculated, i.e. the number certainly implanted divided by the sum of the number certainly implanted and the number certainly not implanted, thus describing its relative implantation potential. By extrapolation to the entire population it was possible to establish the implantation potential for each type of embryo. Optimal day 3 embryos were calculated to reach a mean of 47% ongoing implantation. By establishing the implantation potential for most embryos, this model also provides useful information about which embryos are worth freezing in a cost-effective cryopreservation policy.
Key words: blastomere/embryo/fragmentation/implantation potential/pregnancy
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology-Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: eric.van.royen{at}pandora.be
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Racowsky, L. Ohno-Machado, J. Kim, and J. D. Biggers Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day? Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2104 - 2113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bettegowda, O. V. Patel, K.-B. Lee, K.-E. Park, M. Salem, J. Yao, J. J. Ireland, and G. W. Smith Identification of Novel Bovine Cumulus Cell Molecular Markers Predictive of Oocyte Competence: Functional and Diagnostic Implications Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 301 - 309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.G. Vergouw, L.L. Botros, P. Roos, J.W. Lens, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, D.H. Burns, and C.B Lambalk Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1499 - 1504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont Assisted reproductive technologies: how to minimize the risks and complications in developing countries? ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 73 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hamel, I. Dufort, C. Robert, C. Gravel, M.-C. Leveille, A. Leader, and M.-A. Sirard Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1118 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.J. Lambers, S. Roek, L. Luttikhof, R. Schats, R. Homburg, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk A family history of twinning in relation to multiple implantation Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 889 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Holte, L. Berglund, K. Milton, C. Garello, G. Gennarelli, A. Revelli, and T. Bergh Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 548 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.J. Lambers, E. Mager, J. Goutbeek, J. McDonnell, R. Homburg, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk Factors determining early pregnancy loss in singleton and multiple implantations Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 275 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan, and J. Hill Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 230 - 240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. N. James, S. Hennessy, B. Reggio, K. Wiemer, F. Larsen, and J. Cohen The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1599 - 1604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Thurin, T. Hardarson, J. Hausken, B. Jablonowska, K. Lundin, A. Pinborg, and C. Bergh Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1876 - 1880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hnida, I. Agerholm, and S. Ziebe Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 665 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.J. McKenzie, S.A. Pangas, S.A. Carson, E. Kovanci, P. Cisneros, J.E. Buster, P. Amato, and M.M. Matzuk Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2869 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, S. Bangsboll, K.L.T. Schmidt, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1457 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, and M. Elseviers Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1476 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg, E. Van Royen, J. Vander Elst, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, P. Kok, M. Elseviers, L. Annemans, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 917 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. V. Royen, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, D. D. Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1062 - 1069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Lambert Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Placido, M. Wilding, I. Strina, E. Alviggi, C. Alviggi, A. Mollo, M. T. Varicchio, A. Tolino, C. Schiattarella, and B. Dale High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2402 - 2409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rienzi, F. Ubaldi, M. Iacobelli, S. Ferrero, M. G. Minasi, F. Martinez, J. Tesarik, and E. Greco Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1852 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Engmann, N. Maconochie, S. L. Tan, and J. Bekir Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2598 - 2605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Ozturk, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Templeton Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Evaluation and implementation of new strategies Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1319 - 1321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ESHRE Campus Course Report Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 790 - 800. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



