Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Royen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Royen, E.
Right arrow Articles by Gerris, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 2, 326-332, February 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model

Eric Van Royen,1, Kathelijne Mangelschots, Diane De Neubourg, Indra Laureys, Greet Ryckaert and Jan Gerris

Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology-Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium

For optimal embryo selection in IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), knowledge of the implantation potential is essential. This is a retrospective analysis of morphological characteristics and cleavage kinetics of day 3 embryos resulting in an objective assessment of the relative implantation potential of each distinct type of embryo. Therefore transferred embryos were sampled according to their documented implantation behaviour: all embryos without any implantation on the one hand and all those with 100% ongoing implantation on the other. There were 213 such embryos in the latter group of which only seven (3%) had >20% fragmentation and only one embryo (0.5%) showed multinucleation (an embryo containing >20% fragmentation). For this reason, only embryos with <=20% fragmentation and without multinucleation were analysed. They were split up according to the amount of fragmentation and the number of blastomeres on day 2 and on day 3. For each type, the implanted fraction was calculated, i.e. the number certainly implanted divided by the sum of the number certainly implanted and the number certainly not implanted, thus describing its relative implantation potential. By extrapolation to the entire population it was possible to establish the implantation potential for each type of embryo. Optimal day 3 embryos were calculated to reach a mean of 47% ongoing implantation. By establishing the implantation potential for most embryos, this model also provides useful information about which embryos are worth freezing in a cost-effective cryopreservation policy.

Key words: blastomere/embryo/fragmentation/implantation potential/pregnancy

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics-Gynaecology-Fertility, Middelheim Hospital, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium. E-mail: eric.van.royen{at}pandora.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Racowsky, L. Ohno-Machado, J. Kim, and J. D. Biggers
Is there an advantage in scoring early embryos on more than one day?
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2009; 24(9): 2104 - 2113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
A. Bettegowda, O. V. Patel, K.-B. Lee, K.-E. Park, M. Salem, J. Yao, J. J. Ireland, and G. W. Smith
Identification of Novel Bovine Cumulus Cell Molecular Markers Predictive of Oocyte Competence: Functional and Diagnostic Implications
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2008; 79(2): 301 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C.G. Vergouw, L.L. Botros, P. Roos, J.W. Lens, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, D.H. Burns, and C.B Lambalk
Metabolomic profiling by near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool to assess embryo viability: a novel, non-invasive method for embryo selection
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 1499 - 1504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ESHRE MonogrHome page
P. De Sutter, J. Gerris, and M. Dhont
Assisted reproductive technologies: how to minimize the risks and complications in developing countries?
ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 73 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hamel, I. Dufort, C. Robert, C. Gravel, M.-C. Leveille, A. Leader, and M.-A. Sirard
Identification of differentially expressed markers in human follicular cells associated with competent oocytes
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1118 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Lambers, S. Roek, L. Luttikhof, R. Schats, R. Homburg, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk
A family history of twinning in relation to multiple implantation
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 889 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, R. Janssens, L. Helmgaard, J.-C. Arce, and for the MERIT (Menotrophin vs Recombinant FSH in v
Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2007; 22(9): 2404 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Holte, L. Berglund, K. Milton, C. Garello, G. Gennarelli, A. Revelli, and T. Bergh
Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2007; 22(2): 548 - 557.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.J. Lambers, E. Mager, J. Goutbeek, J. McDonnell, R. Homburg, R. Schats, P.G.A. Hompes, and C.B. Lambalk
Factors determining early pregnancy loss in singleton and multiple implantations
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 275 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan, and J. Hill
Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 230 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. N. James, S. Hennessy, B. Reggio, K. Wiemer, F. Larsen, and J. Cohen
The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1599 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, A. Steylemans, and M. Elseviers
The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Thurin, T. Hardarson, J. Hausken, B. Jablonowska, K. Lundin, A. Pinborg, and C. Bergh
Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2005; 20(7): 1876 - 1880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. M.R. Gerris
Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal
Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Hnida, I. Agerholm, and S. Ziebe
Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryos
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 665 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. Staessen, P. Platteau, E. Van Assche, A. Michiels, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, P. Devroey, I. Liebaers, and A. Van Steirteghem
Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2849 - 2858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L.J. McKenzie, S.A. Pangas, S.A. Carson, E. Kovanci, P. Cisneros, J.E. Buster, P. Amato, and M.M. Matzuk
Human cumulus granulosa cell gene expression: a predictor of fertilization and embryo selection in women undergoing IVF
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2869 - 2874.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, S. Bangsboll, K.L.T. Schmidt, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen
Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1457 - 1460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D. De Neubourg, J. Gerris, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, and M. Elseviers
Single top quality embryo transfer as a model for prediction of early pregnancy outcome
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1476 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg, E. Van Royen, J. Vander Elst, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, P. Kok, M. Elseviers, L. Annemans, et al.
A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 917 - 923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Ziebe, K. Lundin, A. Loft, C. Bergh, A. Nyboe Andersen, U. Selleskog, D. Nielsen, C. Grondahl, H. Kim, and J.-C. Arce
FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2575 - 2581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Tiitinen, L. Unkila-Kallio, M. Halttunen, and C. Hyden-Granskog
Impact of elective single embryo transfer on the twin pregnancy rate
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1449 - 1453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Royen, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, D. D. Neubourg, M. Valkenburg, G. Ryckaert, and J. Gerris
Multinucleation in cleavage stage embryos
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 1062 - 1069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. D. Lambert
Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: The children of assisted reproduction confront the responsible conduct of assisted reproductive technologies
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3011 - 3015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
D.D. Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, G. Ryckaert, M. Valkenburg, J. Barudy-Vasquez, and J. Gerris
Impact of patients' choice for single embryo transfer of a top quality embryo versus double embryo transfer in the first IVF/ICSI cycle
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2621 - 2625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Gerris, D. De Neubourg, K. Mangelschots, E. Van Royen, M. Vercruyssen, J. Barudy-Vasquez, M. Valkenburg, and G. Ryckaert
Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 17(10): 2626 - 2631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. De Placido, M. Wilding, I. Strina, E. Alviggi, C. Alviggi, A. Mollo, M. T. Varicchio, A. Tolino, C. Schiattarella, and B. Dale
High outcome predictability after IVF using a combined score for zygote and embryo morphology and growth rate
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2402 - 2409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Rienzi, F. Ubaldi, M. Iacobelli, S. Ferrero, M. G. Minasi, F. Martinez, J. Tesarik, and E. Greco
Day 3 embryo transfer with combined evaluation at the pronuclear and cleavage stages compares favourably with day 5 blastocyst transfer
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2002; 17(7): 1852 - 1855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Engmann, N. Maconochie, S. L. Tan, and J. Bekir
Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2598 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
O. Ozturk, S. Bhattacharya, and A. Templeton
Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART: Evaluation and implementation of new strategies
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2001; 16(7): 1319 - 1321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
ESHRE Campus Course Report
Prevention of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI by single embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2001; 16(4): 790 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.