Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 4, 644-651,
April 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation
This multicentre, randomized study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.25 mg ganirelix (Orgalutran®, AntagonTM) treatment, using triptorelin (Decapeptyl®) in a long protocol as a reference treatment. In total, 236 subjects were randomized to treatment with ganirelix (0.25 mg, s.c.) and 119 to triptorelin (0.1 mg, s.c.) treatment (treatment ratio 2:1). Treatment with ganirelix started on day 6 of stimulation, whereas treatment with triptorelin started on menstrual cycle day 21 to 24 of the previous cycle (i.e. the midluteal phase). The ganirelix regimen was on average 17 days shorter (9 versus 26 days) compared to the triptorelin regimen. The median total dose of recombinant FSH (Puregon®) used was 450 IU less (1350 versus 1800 IU) in the ganirelix protocol. The initial follicular growth was faster and, consequently, oestradiol concentrations were higher in the ganirelix group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles
11 mm was 10.1 and 10.7 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 1090 and 1370 pg/ml in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. Per attempt, 7.9 and 9.6 oocytes (mean) were retrieved in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The fertilization rates (64.0% ganirelix and 64.9% triptorelin) and the mean number of good quality embryos (2.7 and 2.9) were comparable in both treatment groups. The implantation rate was identical (22.9%). The ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt was 31.0 and 33.9% in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The ganirelix regimen showed an improved local tolerance in that the percentage of subjects with at least one local skin reaction was 2-fold lower than in the triptorelin group (11.9 versus 24.1%). Taking all data together, it may be concluded that ganirelix offers a new treatment regimen in ovarian stimulation that is short, safe and well-tolerated, optimizing convenience for the patient.
Key words: ganirelix/GnRH antagonist/ovarian stimulation/recombinant FSH/triptorelin
To whom correspondence should be addressed: H.G. van Hooren, Clinical Development Department, NV Organon, P.O.Box 20, 5340 BH Oss, The Netherlands. E-mail: h.hooren{at}organon.oss.akzonobel.nl
*The European and Middle East Ogalutran® Study Group: F.Fischl (Vienna, Wien, Austria), Aboulghar (Cairo, Egypt), Marès (Nimes, France), B.Nicollet (Bron, France), H.M.Behre (Münster, Germany), H.van der Ven (Bonn, Germany), A.Simon (Jerusalem, Israel), Z.Kilani (Amman, Jordan), P.N.Barri (Barcelona, Spain), M.Häberle (Baden, Switzerland), D.D.M.Braat (Nijmegen, The Netherlands) and N.Lambalk (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Devroey, M. Aboulghar, J. Garcia-Velasco, G. Griesinger, P. Humaidan, E. Kolibianakis, W. Ledger, C. Tomas, and B. C.J.M. Fauser Improving the patient's experience of IVF/ICSI: a proposal for an ovarian stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist co-treatment Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 764 - 774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Corifollitropin Alfa Dose-finding Study Group A randomized dose-response trial of a single injection of corifollitropin alfa to sustain multifollicular growth during controlled ovarian stimulation Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2484 - 2492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Vani, S. E. McDonald, A. R.W. Williams, J. I. Mason, K. J. Thong, and H. O.D. Critchley Mid-luteal endometrial intracrinology following controlled ovarian hyperstimulation involving use of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone antagonist Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2981 - 2991. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Huirne, R. Homburg, and C.B. Lambalk Are GnRH antagonists comparable to agonists for use in IVF? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2805 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Allegra, A. Marino, F. Coffaro, P. Scaglione, F. Sammartano, G. Rizza, and A. Volpes GnRH antagonist-induced inhibition of the premature LH surge increases pregnancy rates in IUI-stimulated cycles. A prospective randomized trial Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 101 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Asimakopoulos, F. Koster, R. Felberbaum, S. Al-Hasani, K. Diedrich, and N. Nikolettos Cytokine and hormonal profile in blood serum and follicular fluids during ovarian stimulation with the multidose antagonist or the long agonist protocol Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2006; 21(12): 3091 - 3095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.M. Kolibianakis, J. Collins, B.C. Tarlatzis, P. Devroey, K. Diedrich, and G. Griesinger Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2006; 12(6): 651 - 671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Gustofson, J. H. Segars, and F. W. Larsen Ganirelix acetate causes a rapid reduction in estradiol levels without adversely affecting oocyte maturation in women pretreated with leuprolide acetate who are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2830 - 2837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. E. Messinis Ovarian feedback, mechanism of action and possible clinical implications Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2006; 12(5): 557 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.A. Huirne, J.N. Hugues, C. Pirard, F. Fischl, J.C. Sage, J.L. Pouly, A. Obruca, D.M. Braat, A.C.D. van Loenen, and C.B. Lambalk Cetrorelix in an oral contraceptive-pretreated stimulation cycle compared with buserelin in IVF/ICSI patients treated with r-hFSH: a randomized, multicentre, phase IIIb study Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1408 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Rombauts, D. Healy, R. J. Norman, and on behalf of the Orgalutran Scheduling Study Group A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 95 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I.E. Messinis, D. Loutradis, E. Domali, C.P. Kotsovassilis, L. Papastergiopoulou, A. Kallitsaris, P. Drakakis, K. Dafopoulos, and S. Milingos Alternate day and daily administration of GnRH antagonist may prevent premature luteinization to a similar extent during FSH treatment Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3192 - 3197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Y. Liu, P. Y. Takahashi, P. D. Roebuck, A. Iranmanesh, and J. D. Veldhuis Aging in Healthy Men Impairs Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone (LH)-Stimulated Testosterone Secretion Monitored under a Two-Day Intravenous Pulsatile LH Clamp J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5544 - 5550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ragni, W. Vegetti, A. Riccaboni, B. Engl, C. Brigante, and P.G. Crosignani Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2421 - 2425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Lainas, J. Zorzovilis, G. Petsas, G. Stavropoulou, H. Cazlaris, V. Daskalaki, G. Lainas, and E. Alexopoulou In a flexible antagonist protocol, earlier, criteria-based initiation of GnRH antagonist is associated with increased pregnancy rates in IVF Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2426 - 2433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Prapas, Y. Prapas, Y. Panagiotidis, S. Prapa, P. Vanderzwalmen, R. Schoysman, and G. Makedos GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1516 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Sata, H. Yamada, K. Suzuki, Y. Saijo, E. H Kato, M. Morikawa, H. Minakami, and R. Kishi Caffeine intake, CYP1A2 polymorphism and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss Mol. Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 11(5): 357 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Gomez-Palomares, B. Julia, B. Acevedo-Martin, M. Martinez-Burgos, E.R. Hernandez, and E. Ricciarelli Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 368 - 372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Saijo, F. Sata, H. Yamada, K. Suzuki, S. Sasaki, T. Kondo, Y.Y. Gong, E.H. Kato, S. Shimada, M. Morikawa, et al. Ah receptor, CYP1A1, CYP1A2 and CYP1B1 gene polymorphisms are not involved in the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 10(10): 729 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk Dose-finding study of daily gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist for the prevention of premature luteinizing hormone surges in IVF/ICSI patients: antide and hormone levels Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2206 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.H. Mochtar and on behalf of The Dutch Ganirelix Study Group The effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist protocol on folliculogenesis in IVF/ICSI Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1713 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, J. Smitz, M. Camus, H. Tournaye, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey Elevated progesterone at initiation of stimulation is associated with a lower ongoing pregnancy rate after IVF using GnRH antagonists Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2004; 19(7): 1525 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devroey, B. C. Fauser, P. Platteau, N. G. Beckers, M. Dhont, and B. M. Mannaerts Induction of Multiple Follicular Development by a Single Dose of Long-Acting Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH-CTP, Corifollitropin Alfa) for Controlled Ovarian Stimulation before in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2062 - 2070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Out, A. Rutherford, R. Fleming, C. C.K. Tay, G. Trew, W. Ledger, and D. Cahill A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing starting doses of 150 and 200 IU of recombinant FSH in women treated with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix for assisted reproduction Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. P. Hohmann, N. S. Macklon, and B. C. J. M. Fauser A Randomized Comparison of Two Ovarian Stimulation Protocols with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Antagonist Cotreatment for in Vitro Fertilization Commencing Recombinant Follicle-Stimulating Hormone on Cycle Day 2 or 5 with the Standard Long GnRH Agonist Protocol J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Hwang, L.-W. Huang, B.-C. Hsieh, Y.-L. Tsai, S.-C. Huang, C.-Y. Chen, M.-L. Hsieh, P.-H. Chen, and Y.-H. Lin Ovarian stimulation by clomiphene citrate and hMG in combination with cetrorelix acetate for ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 45 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Boerrigter, J. J. de Bie, B. M.J.L. Mannaerts, B. P. van Leeuwen, and D. P.J. Passier-Timmermans Obstetrical and neonatal outcome after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2027 - 2034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Al-Inany GnRH agonist versus antagonist therapy Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2002; 17(5): 1413 - 1413. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Al-Inany and M. Aboulghar GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2002; 17(4): 874 - 885. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
B. C. Fauser, D. de Jong, F. Olivennes, H. Wramsby, C. Tay, J. Itskovitz-Eldor, and H. G. van Hooren Endocrine Profiles after Triggering of Final Oocyte Maturation with GnRH Agonist after Cotreatment with the GnRH Antagonist Ganirelix during Ovarian Hyperstimulation for in Vitro Fertilization J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 709 - 715. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Mannaerts, E. van Hooren, and P. Boerrigter Subgroup analyses in Orgalutran trials Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2726 - 2726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




