Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 4, 757-764,
April 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Differential effects of repeated ovarian stimulation on cytoplasmic and spindle organization in metaphase II mouse oocytes matured in vivo and in vitro
1 Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 and 2 Colorado Reproductive Endocrinology, Rose Medical Center, Denver, CO 80220, USA
The effects of four rounds of ovarian stimulation spaced 16 weeks apart on the normality of metaphase II (MII) spindle formation, chromosomal alignment and cytoplasmic organization were examined in intact ovulated mouse oocytes and at MII for oocytes obtained at the germinal vesicle stage from the same ovaries and matured in vitro. The terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling assay was used to identify DNA strand breaks in chromosomes, and histological studies of ovaries between and at each round of ovarian stimulation were performed. The results demonstrate a progressive and significant increase in the frequency of spindle defects with each round of ovarian stimulation, including those spaced weeks apart. Oocytes with spindle defects were also characterized by the occurrence of detached chromosomes and cytoplasmic asters. In contrast, in-vitro matured oocytes derived from the same ovaries were normal. No evidence of DNA strand breaks with repeated rounds of ovarian stimulation was detected in ovulated or in-vitro matured oocytes. The development and persistence of nodules of hypertrophied granulosa in regions where follicular growth occurs suggest that a progressively increasing proportion of oocytes in the ovulatory pathway may experience an intrafollicular milieu that has negative consequences for competence. The results are discussed with respect to ovarian and oocyte biological ageing and possible adverse implications for human oocyte competence with repeated hyperstimulation.
Key words: meiotic chromosomes/meiotic spindle/oocyte competence/ovarian stimulation
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA. E-mail: vanblerk{at}spot.colorado.edu
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, N.S. Macklon, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, E.B. Baart, F.P. Hohmann, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and F.J. Broekmans The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.F.G. Verberg, N.S. Macklon, G. Nargund, R. Frydman, P. Devroey, F.J. Broekmans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 13 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Han, Y. G. Chung, S. Gao, and K. E. Latham Maternal Factors Controlling Blastomere Fragmentation in Early Mouse Embryos Biol Reprod, March 1, 2005; 72(3): 612 - 618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Roberts, A. Iatropoulou, D. Ciantar, J. Stark, D. L. Becker, S. Franks, and K. Hardy Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Affects Metaphase I Chromosome Alignment and Increases Aneuploidy in Mouse Oocytes Matured in Vitro Biol Reprod, January 1, 2005; 72(1): 107 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ziebe, S. Bangsboll, K.L.T. Schmidt, A. Loft, A. Lindhard, and A. Nyboe Andersen Embryo quality in natural versus stimulated IVF cycles Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1457 - 1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Miyara, F.-X. Aubriot, A. Glissant, C. Nathan, S. Douard, A. Stanovici, F. Herve, M. Dumont-Hassan, A. L. Meur, P. Cohen-Bacrie, et al. Multiparameter analysis of human oocytes at metaphase II stage after IVF failure in non-male infertility Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1494 - 1503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M.H. Combelles and D. F. Albertini Assessment of Oocyte Quality Following Repeated Gonadotropin Stimulation in the Mouse Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 812 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


