Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1120-1128,
June 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Embryo donation: outcome and attitudes among embryo donors and recipients
The Family Federation of Finland, Infertility Clinic, Helsinki, Finland
The outcome of an embryo donation programme was evaluated and attitudes among donors and recipients studied by means of a questionnaire survey. A total of 27 couples went through 54 treatment cycles with frozenthawed embryos donated by other infertile couples. The indications for treatment were premature or incipient ovarian failure in combination with severe male factor infertility. The mean age of the recipient women was 36 years, and that of the recipient men was 35 years. The mean duration of infertility was 8 years (range 219 years). Forty-six couples donated 209 excess frozen embryos to the programme. The clinical pregnancy rate in the recipients was 27.8% (15/54) per embryo transfer. An average of 1.9 embryos were transferred on each occasion. The response rate to the questionnaire was high (8091%). Significantly more recipients (69%) than donors (47%) considered that the child should be informed about the manner of conception (P < 0.05). Some 29% of recipients and 42% of donors thought that the child should receive identifying information concerning the donor couple. The interest of the offspring, not only as regards knowing his/her genetic origin but also knowing full-blood genetic siblings, should be kept in mind in embryo donation programmes.
Key words: anonymity/attitudes/embryo donation/infertility/recipients
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Infertility Clinic, The Family Federation of Finland, PO Box 849, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: viveca.soderstrom-anttila{at}vaestoliitto.fi
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Goedeke and D. Payne Embryo donation in New Zealand: a pilot study Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2009; 24(8): 1939 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. MacCallum Embryo donation parents' attitudes towards donors: comparison with adoption Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2009; 24(3): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Burr and P Reynolds Thinking ethically about genetic inheritance: liberal rights, communitarianism and the right to privacy for parents of donor insemination children J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2008; 34(4): 281 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.R. Newton, J. Fisher, V. Feyles, F. Tekpetey, L. Hughes, and D. Isacsson Changes in patient preferences in the disposal of cryopreserved embryos Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3124 - 3128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. MacCallum and S. Golombok Embryo donation families: mothers' decisions regarding disclosure of donor conception Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 2888 - 2895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Lacey Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights into patients' thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1751 - 1758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. van den Akker A review of family donor constructs: Current research and future directions Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2006; 12(2): 91 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Lacey Parent identity and 'virtual' children: why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1661 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bangsboll, A. Pinborg, C. Yding Andersen, and A. Nyboe Andersen Patients' attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2415 - 2419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Eydoux, F. Thepot, F. Fellmann, C. Francannet, B. Simon-Bouy, P. Jouannet, J. L. Bresson, J. P. Siffroi, and the Commission de Genetique de la Federation Franc How can the genetic risks of embryo donation be minimized?: Proposed guidelines of the French Federation of CECOS (Centre d'Etude et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme) Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1685 - 1688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. McMahon, F. L. Gibson, G. I. Leslie, D. M. Saunders, K. A. Porter, and C. C. Tennant Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Newton, A. McDermid, F. Tekpetey, and I. S. Tummon Embryo donation: attitudes toward donation procedures and factors predicting willingness to donate Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 878 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


