Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van der Auwera, I.
Right arrow Articles by D'Hooghe, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1237-1243, June 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Superovulation of female mice delays embryonic and fetal development

Ingrid Van der Auwera1, and Thomas D'Hooghe

Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Mouse and human embryos, cultured in vitro, undergo a delay in development compared with those grown in vivo. This delay can be caused by suboptimal culture conditions, but possible influences of ovarian stimulation cannot be excluded. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that both in vitro and in vivo, preimplantation embryonic development and postimplantation fetal development are impaired in superovulated female mice when compared with naturally cycling controls. A delay in in-vitro blastocyst hatching and in-vivo blastocyst formation (P < 0.03 and P < 0.0001 respectively) and a 40% fetal growth retardation (P < 0.0001) were observed after superovulation in comparison with naturally cycling controls. After transfer to non-stimulated foster mothers, blastocysts from stimulated females had a lower implantation rate (P < 0.005), and developed into fewer living fetuses (P < 0.02), more resorption sites (P < 0.02) and had more pronounced growth retardation (P < 0.0001) when compared with blastocysts from naturally cycling controls. In conclusion, superovulation in the mouse causes a delayed embryonic development in vitro and in vivo, an increased abnormal blastocyst formation, a pronounced fetal growth retardation, and an increased number of resorption sites. If this observation in mice can be extrapolated to humans, it may offer an explanation for the delay in embryonic development and the low birth weight observed after IVF.

Key words: blastocysts/fetal growth retardation/implantation/ovarian stimulation/weight

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Leuven University Fertility Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: Ingrid.Vanderauwera{at}uz.kuleuven.ac.be


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, M.J.C. Eijkemans, N.S. Macklon, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, E.B. Baart, F.P. Hohmann, B.C.J.M. Fauser, and F.J. Broekmans
The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 5 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
M.F.G. Verberg, N.S. Macklon, G. Nargund, R. Frydman, P. Devroey, F.J. Broekmans, and B.C.J.M. Fauser
Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2009; 15(1): 13 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
C. Hayden
GnRH analogues: applications in assisted reproductive techniques
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S17 - S25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Diedrich, and M. Ludwig
Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2549 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
K I Aston, C M Peterson, and D T Carrell
Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review
Reproduction, October 1, 2008; 136(4): 377 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. E. Swain and T. B. Pool
ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2008; 14(5): 431 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. L. Fortier, F. L. Lopes, N. Darricarrere, J. Martel, and J. M. Trasler
Superovulation alters the expression of imprinted genes in the midgestation mouse placenta
Hum. Mol. Genet., June 1, 2008; 17(11): 1653 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. A. Murray, A. K.E. Swales, R. E. Smith, M. D. Molinek, S. G. Hillier, and N. Spears
Follicular growth and oocyte competence in the in vitro cultured mouse follicle: effects of gonadotrophins and steroids
Mol. Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 14(2): 75 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. J. McTavish, M. Jimenez, K. A. Walters, J. Spaliviero, N. P. Groome, A. P. Themmen, J. A. Visser, D. J. Handelsman, and C. M. Allan
Rising Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Levels with Age Accelerate Female Reproductive Failure
Endocrinology, September 1, 2007; 148(9): 4432 - 4439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. J. Watkins, D. Platt, T. Papenbrock, A. Wilkins, J. J. Eckert, W. Y. Kwong, C. Osmond, M. Hanson, and T. P. Fleming
From the Cover: Mouse embryo culture induces changes in postnatal phenotype including raised systolic blood pressure
PNAS, March 27, 2007; 104(13): 5449 - 5454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Sato, E. Otsu, H. Negishi, T. Utsunomiya, and T. Arima
Aberrant DNA methylation of imprinted loci in superovulated oocytes
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 26 - 35.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Sibug, N. Datson, A.M.I. Tijssen, M. Morsink, J. de Koning, E.R. de Kloet, and F.M. Helmerhorst
Effects of urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins on gene expression profiles during the murine peri-implantation period
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 75 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
H.-C. Ruan, X.-M. Zhu, Q. Luo, A.-X. Liu, Y.-L. Qian, C.-Y. Zhou, F. Jin, H.-F. Huang, and J.-Z. Sheng
Ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonist, but not GnRH antagonist, partially restores the expression of endometrial integrin beta3 and leukaemia-inhibitory factor and improves uterine receptivity in mice
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2521 - 2529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. L. Kelley, K. L. Kind, M. Lane, R. L. Robker, J. G. Thompson, and L. J. Edwards
Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alters maternal ovarian hormone concentrations and the uterus and perturbs fetal development in mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2006; 291(4): E761 - E770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. S. Macklon, R. L. Stouffer, L. C. Giudice, and B. C. J. M. Fauser
The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 170 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
C. De Geyter, M. De Geyter, S. Steimann, H. Zhang, and W. Holzgreve
Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 21(3): 705 - 712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. J. Edwards, K. L. Kind, D. T. Armstrong, and J. G. Thompson
Effects of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone on embryo development in mice
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, May 1, 2005; 288(5): E845 - E851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Sibug, J. de Koning, A.M.I. Tijssen, M.C. de Ruiter, E.R. de Kloet, and F.M. Helmerhorst
Urinary gonadotrophins but not recombinant gonadotrophins reduce expression of VEGF120 and its receptors flt-1 and flk-1 in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 649 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
D. Zudova, A. J. Wyrobek, J. Bishop, and F. Marchetti
Impaired fertility in T-stock female mice after superovulation
Reproduction, November 1, 2004; 128(5): 573 - 581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
R. Roberts, J. Stark, A. Iatropoulou, D. L. Becker, S. Franks, and K. Hardy
Energy Substrate Metabolism of Mouse Cumulus-Oocyte Complexes: Response to Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Is Mediated by the Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Pathway and Is Associated with Oocyte Maturation
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2004; 71(1): 199 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. Lucifero, J.R. Chaillet, and J. M. Trasler
Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2004; 10(1): 3 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. L. Krisher
The effect of oocyte quality on development
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E14 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M.H. Combelles and D. F. Albertini
Assessment of Oocyte Quality Following Repeated Gonadotropin Stimulation in the Mouse
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2003; 68(3): 812 - 821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R.M. Sibug, F.M. Helmerhorst, A.M.I. Tijssen, E.R. de Kloet, and J. de Koning
Gonadotrophin stimulation reduces VEGF120 expression in the mouse uterus during the peri-implantation period
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1643 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.