Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, K.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diedrich, K.
Right arrow Articles by Engel, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1305-1306, June 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Letters to the editor

Comment on the debate article: Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists

K. Diedrich1, R. Frydman2, P. Devroey3, R. Felberbaum1, A.V. Schally4, T. Reissmann5,7 and J. Engel6

1 Clinic for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Lübeck, Germany, 2 Hospital Antoine-Beclere, Clamart Cedex, France, 3 Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Dutch-speaking Free University of Brussels, Belgium, 4 Endocrine, Polypeptide and Cancer Institute, VA Medical Center and Tulane University, New Orleans, USA, 5 Experimental Endocrinology, Corporate Research ASTA Medica AG, Frankfurt and 6 ASTA Medica AG, Frankfurt, Germany

Dear Sir,

The above article in the debate section (Hernandez, 2000Go) addressed the important question of the use of antagonists of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH)/luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) for IVF–embryo transfer, but we do not consider the viewpoints expressed to be correct. Although the title implied a scientific assessment of this approach, the article failed to provide an accurate picture of the scientific and clinical issues involved. The statements by the author that LHRH . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Notes

References


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Hum ReprodHome page
R. Bernabeu
Historical comment on the debate: embryo implantation is the rubicon for the GnRH antagonist, and answer
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2001; 16(10): 2247 - 2247.
[Full Text] [PDF]