Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (67)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrell, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Right arrow Articles by Vanrell, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 8, 1636-1643, August 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: analysing threshold values and effects on ovarian response and the outcome of assisted reproduction in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH

Juan Balasch1,3, Ester Vidal1, Joana Peñarrubia1, Roser Casamitjana2, Francisco Carmona1, Montserrat Creus1, Francisco Fábregues1 and Juan A. Vanrell1

1 Institut Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology and 2 Hormonal Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Hospital Clínic, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

BACKGROUND: It has been recently suggested that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist down-regulation in some normogonadotrophic women may result in profound suppression of LH concentrations, impairing adequate oestradiol synthesis and IVF and pregnancy outcome. The aims of this study, where receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used, were: (i) to assess the usefulness of serum LH measurement on stimulation day 7 (S7) as a predictor of ovarian response, IVF outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy in patients treated with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression; and (ii) to define the best threshold value, if any, to discriminate between women with `low' or `normal' LH concentrations. METHODS: A total of 144 infertile women undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment were included. Seventy-two consecutive patients having a positive pregnancy test (including 58 ongoing pregnancies and 14 early pregnancy losses) were initially selected. As a control non-pregnant group, the next non-conception IVF/ICSI cycle after each conceptual cycle in our assisted reproduction programme was used. RESULTS: The median and range of LH values in non-conception cycles, conception cycles, ongoing pregnancies, and early pregnancy losses, clearly overlapped. ROC analysis showed that serum LH concentration on S7 was unable to discriminate between conception and non-conception cycles (AUCROC = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.61) or ongoing pregnancy versus early pregnancy loss groups (AUCROC = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.70). To assess further the potential impact of suppressed concentrations of circulating LH during ovarian stimulation on the outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment, the three threshold values of mid-follicular serum LH proposed in the literature (<1, <=0.7, <0.5 IU/l) to discriminate between women with `low' or `normal' LH were applied to our study population. No significant differences were found with respect to ovarian response, IVF/ICSI outcome, implantation, and the outcome of pregnancy between `low' and `normal' S7 LH women as defined by those threshold values. CONCLUSIONS: Our results do not support the need for additional exogenous LH supplementation in down-regulated women receiving a recombinant FSH-only preparation.

Key words: assisted reproduction/early pregnancy loss /FSH/LH/ovarian stimulation

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Institut Clínic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic, C/Casanova 143, 08036-Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: jbalasch{at}medicina.ub.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Weghofer, S. Munne, W. Brannath, S. Chen, G. Tomkin, N. Cekleniak, M. Garrisi, D. Barad, J. Cohen, and N. Gleicher
The impact of LH-containing gonadotropins on diploidy rates in preimplantation embryos: long protocol stimulation
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2008; 23(3): 499 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. NyboeAndersen, P. Humaidan, G. Fried, J. Hausken, L. Antila, S. Bangsboll, P.E. Rasmussen, S. Lindenberg, H. E. Bredkjaer, H. Meinertz, et al.
Recombinant LH supplementation to recombinant FSH during the final days of controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. A multicentre, prospective, randomized, controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 427 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Lahoud, M.A. Jefout, J. Tyler, J. Ryan, and G. Driscoll
A relative reduction in mid-follicular LH concentrations during GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles leads to lower live birth rates
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2645 - 2649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch, F. Fabregues, J. Penarrubia, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, M. Creus, D. Manau, G. Casals, and J. A. Vanrell
Pretreatment with transdermal testosterone may improve ovarian response to gonadotrophins in poor-responder IVF patients with normal basal concentrations of FSH
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1884 - 1893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, J. Collins, B. Tarlatzis, E. Papanikolaou, and P. Devroey
Are endogenous LH levels during ovarian stimulation for IVF using GnRH analogues associated with the probability of ongoing pregnancy? A systematic review
Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2006; 12(1): 3 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Bjercke, P. Fedorcsak, T. Abyholm, R. Storeng, G. Ertzeid, N. Oldereid, A. Omland, and T. Tanbo
IVF/ICSI outcome and serum LH concentration on day 1 of ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH under pituitary suppression
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2441 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. Griesinger, A. Schultze-Mosgau, K. Dafopoulos, A. Schroeder, A. Schroer, S. von Otte, D. Hornung, K. Diedrich, and R. Felberbaum
Recombinant luteinizing hormone supplementation to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone induced ovarian hyperstimulation in the GnRH-antagonist multiple-dose protocol
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 1200 - 1206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, G. Casals, R. Casamitjana, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotropin treatment
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 915 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, D. Manau, M. Creus, F. Carmona, R. Casamitjana, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
Previous cycle cancellation due to poor follicular development as a predictor of ovarian response in cycles stimulated with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-gonadotrophin treatment
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 622 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
G. De Placido, C. Alviggi, A. Perino, I. Strina, F. Lisi, A. Fasolino, R. De Palo, A. Ranieri, N. Colacurci, A. Mollo, et al.
Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E.M. Kolibianakis, K. Zikopoulos, J. Schiettecatte, J. Smitz, H. Tournaye, M. Camus, A.C. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey
Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2490 - 2496.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch, M. Guimera, O. Martinez-Pasarell, J. Ros, J. A. Vanrell, and W. Jimenez
Adrenomedullin and vascular endothelial growth factor production by follicular fluid macrophages and granulosa cells
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, M. Creus, D. Manau, R. Casamitjana, M. Guimera, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2689 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Creus, J. Ordi, F. Fabregues, R. Casamitjana, F. Carmona, A. Cardesa, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
The effect of different hormone therapies on integrin expression and pinopode formation in the human endometrium: a controlled study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 683 - 693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik and C. Mendoza
Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2002; 17(12): 3129 - 3137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
S. Civico, N. Agell, O. Bachs, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
Increased expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in cleavage-stage human embryos exhibiting developmental arrest
Mol. Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 919 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P. Humaidan, L. Bungum, M. Bungum, and C.Y. Andersen
Ovarian response and pregnancy outcome related to mid-follicular LH levels in women undergoing assisted reproduction with GnRH agonist down-regulation and recombinant FSH stimulation
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2002; 17(8): 2016 - 2021.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Balasch
The potential value of mid-follicular phase LH
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 518 - 520.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Filicori
The potential value of mid-follicular phase LH
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 517 - 520.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Mannaerts, E. van Hooren, and P. Boerrigter
Subgroup analyses in Orgalutran trials
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2001; 16(12): 2726 - 2726.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.