Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubuisson, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Chapron, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubuisson, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Chapron, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 8, 1726-1731, August 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Laparoscopic myomectomy: predicting the risk of conversion to an open procedure

Jean-Bernard Dubuisson1,3, Arnaud Fauconnier1, Virginie Fourchotte1, Katayoun Babaki-Fard1, Joël Coste2 and Charles Chapron1

1 Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Clinique universitaire Baudelocque and 2 Service de Biostatistique et d'informatique médicale, Paris, France

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic myomectomy (LM) has some advantages over laparotomy; however, it is reputed to be technically difficult, and the risk of conversion to laparotomy might be an obstacle in using this procedure. The aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative factors affecting the risk of conversion to an open procedure (either laparoscopic assisted myomectomy or laparotomy), and to develop a simple prediction model based on available pre-operative data with the use of multiple logistic regression. METHODS: A total of 426 women presenting with a subserous or intramural myoma measuring 20 mm or more underwent LM between March 1989 and October 1999. Of these patients, 378 had successful LM. Forty eight patients [11.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.3–14.3] had a conversion to an open procedure. A total of 265 women had adequate pre-operative ultrasonography (US) and were used for the analysis. RESULTS: The best prediction model included four pre-operative factors that were found to be independently related to the risk of conversion: size 50 mm at US (adjusted OR = 10.3; 95% CI = 2.8–37.9), intramural type (adjusted OR = 4.3; 95% CI = 1.3–14.5), anterior location (adjusted OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.3–9.0) and pre-operative use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (adjusted OR = 5.4; 95% CI = 2.0–14.2). The regression coefficients were then scaled and rounded to integers to provide an estimate of the risk for conversion. For a given patient with selected characteristics the predicted risk varied from 0–73%. CONCLUSIONS: This prediction model provides a useful tool that enables multiple criteria to be taken into account simultaneously to help select cases for LM. GnRH agonists should been used only in selected cases. US evaluation is essential before performing LM.

Key words: conversion risk/laparoscopy/leiomyomas/logistic regression/myomectomy

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Service de chirurgie gynécologique, Clinique universitaire Baudelocque, CHU Cochin Port-Royal, 123 Bd Port-Royal, 75014 Paris, France. E-mail: jean-bernard.dubuisson{at}cch.ap-hop-paris.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
P.-L. Torng, J.-S. Hwang, S.-C. Huang, W.-C. Chang, S.-Y. Chen, D.-Y. Chang, and W.-C. Hsu
Effect of simultaneous morcellation in situ on operative time during laparoscopic myomectomy
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2008; 23(10): 2220 - 2226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.