Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miyazaki, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takahashi, K.
Right arrow Articles by Miyazaki, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 16, No. 9, 1989-1994, September 2001
© 2001 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Value of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting efficacy of GnRH analogue treatment for uterine leiomyoma

Kentaro Takahashi1,4, Masako Okada1, Izumi Imaoka2, Kazuro Sugimura3 and Kohji Miyazaki1

1 Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 Radiology, Shimane Medical University, Izumo, Shimane 693-8501, Japan, and 3 Department of Radiology, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan

BACKGROUND: Estimating pharmacological efficacy is important when selecting conservative treatment of uterine leiomyoma. Hence, the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to predict gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue efficacy was investigated. METHODS: A total of 85 lesions was studied in 40 patients who were clinically diagnosed as having uterine leiomyoma and treated with GnRH analogue for 24 weeks. To evaluate changes in lesion size, T2-weighted and gadopentetate-dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA)-enhanced, T1-weighted MR images were obtained within 2 weeks before, and immediately after termination of, GnRH analogue treatment. RESULTS: An average 46.3% size reduction was observed in 45 lesions (52.9%); these were seen as low signal intensity on T2-weighted images and enhanced by Gd-DTPA. Also, an average 44.7% size reduction was observed in lesions enhanced by Gd-DTPA, irrespective of signal intensity findings on T2-weighted images. The average size reduction of unenhanced lesions was only 17.8%, and significantly different from enhanced lesions (P < 0.001). The prediction of efficacy was difficult in those lesions not enhanced. CONCLUSIONS: It is considered that evaluation of MR signal intensities, and the presence or absence of Gd-DTPA enhancement, would predict treatment efficacy before GnRH analogue administration.

Key words: contrast-enhancement/GnRH analogue/MRI/myometrium/uterine leiomyoma

4 To whom reprint requests should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane Medical University,89-1, Enya-cho, Izumo 693-8501, Japan. E-mail: taka27{at}shimane-med.ac.jp


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Okuda, K. Oshio, H. Shinmoto, A. Tanimoto, H. Asada, T. Fujii, Y. Yoshimura, and S. Kuribayashi
Semiquantitative Assessment of MR Imaging in Prediction of Efficacy of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist for Volume Reduction of Uterine Leiomyoma: Initial Experience
Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 917 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
I. Imaoka, A. Wada, M. Matsuo, M. Yoshida, H. Kitagaki, and K. Sugimura
MR Imaging of Disorders Associated with Female Infertility: Use in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management
RadioGraphics, November 1, 2003; 23(6): 1401 - 1421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.