Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 11, 2924-2929,
November 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Conventional multiple or microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a comparative study
1 Departments of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, 565-0871, 2 Osaka Central Hospital, Osaka, 530-0001 and 3 Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, 543-8502, Japan
BACKGROUND: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) with ICSI is becoming the first-line treatment for non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Recently, the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection TESE was reported to be higher than by conventional TESE. However, a comprehensive comparison between multiple and microdissection TESE patients including histological findings has not been reported. METHODS: Patients with NOA who underwent microdissection TESE (n = 56) or multiple TESE (n = 37) were compared. Pre-operative characteristics were similar between groups. In addition, microscopic findings during microdissection TESE also were investigated. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly longer for microdissection TESE than for multiple TESE. Histological examination suggested that spermatogenesis was relatively more impaired in the microdissection TESE group than in the multiple TESE group. Despite this, SRR by microdissection TESE (42.9%) appeared higher than by conventional TESE (35.1%) although this observation failed to reach statistical significance. Seventeen of 26 patients (65.4%) with heterogeneous tubule were successful for sperm retrieval. No severe operative complications occurred in any patient in either group, and no patient required post-operative hormone replacement to treat hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: Microsurgical technique is safe and may improve SRR for TESE in a variety of patients with NOA, especially patients with heterogeneous testicular tubules.
Key words: histopathology/multiple testicular sperm extraction/non-obstructive azoospermia/spermatogenesis/testicular sperm extraction
4 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: matsumiya{at}uro.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Donoso, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2007; 13(6): 539 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Ohta, Y. Sakaide, and T. Wakayama Generation of progeny via ICSI following enrichment of elongated spermatids from mouse testis by flow-cytometric cell sorting Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2007; 22(6): 1612 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.I. McLachlan, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, C.E. Hoei-Hansen, D.M. de Kretser, and N.E. Skakkebaek Histological evaluation of the human testis--approaches to optimizing the clinical value of the assessment: Mini Review Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 2 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Vernaeve, G. Verheyen, A. Goossens, A. Van Steirteghem, P. Devroey, and H. Tournaye How successful is repeat testicular sperm extraction in patients with azoospermia? Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 21(6): 1551 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Nishimune and H. Tanaka Infertility Caused by Polymorphisms or Mutations in Spermatogenesis-Specific Genes J Androl, May 1, 2006; 27(3): 326 - 334. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Fujita, A. Tsujimura, T. Takao, Y. Miyagawa, K. Matsumiya, M. Koga, M. Takeyama, H. Fujioka, K. Aozasa, and A. Okuyama Expression of inhibin {alpha}, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and stem cell factor in Sertoli cell-only syndrome: relation to successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2289 - 2294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|