Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 12, 3090-3109,
December 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review*
1 National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit and 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
BACKGROUND: Approximately one in six couples experiences problems with their fertility at some point in their reproductive lives. The economic implications of the use of assisted reproductive techniques require consideration. Herein, the health economics research in this area are critically appraised. METHODS: Multiple strategies were used to identify relevant studies. Each title and abstract was independently reviewed by two members of the study team and categorized according to perceived relevance. The selected papers were then assessed for quality and data were extracted, converted to UK pounds sterling at 1999/2000 prices, tabulated and critically appraised. RESULTS: A total of 2547 papers was identified through the searches; this resulted in 30 economic evaluations, 22 cost studies and five economic benefit studies that met the selection criteria. The quality of these studies was mixed; many failed to disaggregate costs, discount future costs or conduct sensitivity analyses. Consistent findings included the following: initiating treatment with intrauterine insemination appeared to be more cost-effective than IVF; vasectomy reversal appeared to be more cost-effective than ICSI; factors associated with poor prognosis decreased the cost-effectiveness of interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of different interventions should be considered when making decisions about treatment. Future economic appraisals of assisted reproductive techniques would benefit from more robust methodology than is evident in much of the published literature to date.
Key words: economics/infertility/systematic review
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK. E-mail: jane.henderson{at}perinat.ox.ac.uk
* The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Health.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W. Ombelet, R. Campo, E. Bosmans, and M. Nijs Intrauterine insemination (IUI) as a first-line treatment in developing countries and methodological aspects that might influence IUI success ESHRE Monogr, July 1, 2008; 2008(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Polinder, E.M.E.W. Heijnen, N.S. Macklon, J.D.F. Habbema, B.J.C.M. Fauser, and M.J.C. Eijkemans Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2008; 23(2): 316 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.A.A. Fiddelers, J.L. Severens, C.D. Dirksen, J.C.M. Dumoulin, J.A. Land, and J.L.H. Evers Economic evaluations of single- versus double-embryo transfer in IVF Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2007; 13(1): 5 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Bungum, P. Humaidan, A. Axmon, M. Spano, L. Bungum, J. Erenpreiss, and A. Giwercman Sperm DNA integrity assessment in prediction of assisted reproduction technology outcome Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 174 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. C. Heng Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Should Be Judiciously Indicated for Male-Factor Subfertility and ICSI Patients J Androl, November 1, 2006; 27(6): 708 - 709. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Heng Egg-sharing in return for subsidized fertility treatment: a possible solution for therapeutic cloning? Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2005; 20(11): 3258 - 3258. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Pinborg IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 575 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M.R. Gerris Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2005; 11(2): 105 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction--the Belgian project Hum. Reprod. Update, January 1, 2005; 11(1): 3 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Koivurova, A.-L. Hartikainen, M. Gissler, E. Hemminki, R. Klemetti, and M.-R. Jarvelin Health care costs resulting from IVF: prenatal and neonatal periods Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2004; 19(12): 2798 - 2805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourg, E. Van Royen, J. Vander Elst, K. Mangelschots, M. Vercruyssen, P. Kok, M. Elseviers, L. Annemans, et al. A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2004; 19(4): 917 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|