Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 12, 3129-3137,
December 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology
Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence
1 MAR&Gen, Molecular Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Gracia 36, 18002 Granada, and 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
BACKGROUND: The role of exogenous LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation is a matter of debate. Here we evaluate the impact of exogenous LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence in an oocyte donation programme. METHODS: Oocyte donors were randomized (computer-generated randomization list) to groups stimulated with FSH alone or with a combination of FSH and LH after pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist administered in the mid-luteal phase. RESULTS: In donors with deep suppression of pituitary LH (<1 IU/l) before the beginning of ovarian stimulation, the inclusion of exogenous LH resulted in an increase in the number of mature oocytes and good-quality zygotes and embryos as well as higher implantation rates when compared with stimulation with FSH alone. In contrast, the inclusion of exogenous LH in the stimulation of donors with pre-stimulation serum LH of
1 IU/l impaired embryo morphology and lowered the implantation rate, although it increased the number of metaphase II oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of exogenous LH to the ovarian stimulation protocol can have beneficial or detrimental effects on oocyte yield and quality, depending on the level of endogenous LH. These data support the concept of a `window' for LH requirement in ovarian stimulation.
Key words: LH/oocyte developmental competence/oocyte donation/ovarian stimulation/pituitary down-regulation
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmendoza{at}ugr.es
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, R. Mendoza-Tesarik, N. Mendoza, and C. Mendoza Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2572 - 2579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Tarlatzis, E. Tavmergen, M. Szamatowicz, A. Barash, A. Amit, E. Levitas, and Z. Shoham The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 90 - 94. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, and C. Mendoza Improvement of delivery and live birth rates after ICSI in women aged >40 years by ovarian co-stimulation with growth hormone Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2536 - 2541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Dal Prato, A. Borini, G. Coticchio, M. Cattoli, and C. Flamigni Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2200 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, and C. Mendoza Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1176 - 1180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, M. Creus, D. Manau, R. Casamitjana, M. Guimera, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2689 - 2697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, and W. Ciampaglia Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1357 - 1358. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Tesarik Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1358 - 1360. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
