Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tesarik, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mendoza, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tesarik, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mendoza, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 12, 3129-3137, December 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Effects of exogenous LH administration during ovarian stimulation of pituitary down-regulated young oocyte donors on oocyte yield and developmental competence

Jan Tesarik1,3 and Carmen Mendoza2

1 MAR&Gen, Molecular Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Gracia 36, 18002 Granada, and 2 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

BACKGROUND: The role of exogenous LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation is a matter of debate. Here we evaluate the impact of exogenous LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence in an oocyte donation programme. METHODS: Oocyte donors were randomized (computer-generated randomization list) to groups stimulated with FSH alone or with a combination of FSH and LH after pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist administered in the mid-luteal phase. RESULTS: In donors with deep suppression of pituitary LH (<1 IU/l) before the beginning of ovarian stimulation, the inclusion of exogenous LH resulted in an increase in the number of mature oocytes and good-quality zygotes and embryos as well as higher implantation rates when compared with stimulation with FSH alone. In contrast, the inclusion of exogenous LH in the stimulation of donors with pre-stimulation serum LH of >=1 IU/l impaired embryo morphology and lowered the implantation rate, although it increased the number of metaphase II oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of exogenous LH to the ovarian stimulation protocol can have beneficial or detrimental effects on oocyte yield and quality, depending on the level of endogenous LH. These data support the concept of a `window' for LH requirement in ovarian stimulation.

Key words: LH/oocyte developmental competence/oocyte donation/ovarian stimulation/pituitary down-regulation

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmendoza{at}ugr.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail
Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, R. Mendoza-Tesarik, N. Mendoza, and C. Mendoza
Beneficial effect of luteal-phase GnRH agonist administration on embryo implantation after ICSI in both GnRH agonist- and antagonist-treated ovarian stimulation cycles
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2572 - 2579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Tarlatzis, E. Tavmergen, M. Szamatowicz, A. Barash, A. Amit, E. Levitas, and Z. Shoham
The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 90 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, and C. Mendoza
Improvement of delivery and live birth rates after ICSI in women aged >40 years by ovarian co-stimulation with growth hormone
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2536 - 2541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. A.F. Huirne, A. C.D. van Loenen, R. Schats, J. McDonnell, P. G.A. Hompes, J. Schoemaker, R. Homburg, and C. B. Lambalk
Dose-finding study of daily GnRH antagonist for the prevention of premature LH surges in IVF/ICSI patients: optimal changes in LH and progesterone for clinical pregnancy
Hum. Reprod., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 359 - 367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Dal Prato, A. Borini, G. Coticchio, M. Cattoli, and C. Flamigni
Half-dose depot triptorelin in pituitary suppression for multiple ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology: a randomized study
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2004; 19(10): 2200 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik, A. Hazout, and C. Mendoza
Enhancement of embryo developmental potential by a single administration of GnRH agonist at the time of implantation
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2004; 19(5): 1176 - 1180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Penarrubia, F. Fabregues, M. Creus, D. Manau, R. Casamitjana, M. Guimera, F. Carmona, J. A. Vanrell, and J. Balasch
LH serum levels during ovarian stimulation as predictors of ovarian response and assisted reproduction outcome in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2003; 18(12): 2689 - 2697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Filicori, G. E. Cognigni, and W. Ciampaglia
Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1357 - 1358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. Tesarik
Effects of LH on oocyte yield and developmental competence
Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2003; 18(6): 1358 - 1360.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.