Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harlin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fried, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harlin, J.
Right arrow Articles by Fried, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 2, 304-309, February 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Delivery rates following IVF treatment, using two recombinant FSH preparations for ovarian stimulation

Jonas Harlin,1, A. Aanesen, G. Csemiczky, H. Wramsby and G. Fried

Reproductive Medical Centre, Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

BACKGROUND: A prospective, semi-randomized, open, clinical study was conducted to compare ovarian response, pregnancy outcome and delivery rates using two recombinant FSH preparations (Gonal-F® and Puregon®) for IVF. METHODS: We analysed stimulation parameters and outcome data in 812 initiated treatment cycles where 292 women used Gonal-F and 200 used Puregon. Embryo transfer was carried out in 676 cycles. In the two preparation groups we also compared 170 women previously treated with FSH for IVF with 266 previously untreated. RESULTS: The pregnancy rate with Gonal-F was 26% and with Puregon 28%. Delivery rates were identical, 22%. Clinical pregnancy and delivery rates per cycle with embryo transfer in earlier untreated women were 29.0 and 24.0%, whereas in previously treated women they were 23.5 and 18.8% respectively. After repeated cycles, delivery frequencies consecutively decreased, independent of the FSH preparation used. CONCLUSION: Gonal-F and Puregon seem to be equally potent in achieving follicular development and equally effective, in terms of delivery rates, for use in an IVF programme. Repeated cycles resulted in equally large consecutive decreases in delivery rates, regardless of preparation choice, but were considered worthwhile for up to three stimulation cycles in selected patients.

Key words: delivery rates/ovarian stimulation/recombinant FSH

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Women and Child Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Karolinska Hospital, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: jonas.harlin{at}ks.se

Submitted on April 17, 2001; resubmitted on September 10, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Pakkila, J. Rasanen, S. Heinonen, H. Tinkanen, L. Tuomivaara, K. Makikallio, M. Hippelainen, J.S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen
Low-dose aspirin does not improve ovarian responsiveness or pregnancy rate in IVF and ICSI patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2005; 20(8): 2211 - 2214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
T. Papageorgiou, J. Guibert, F. Goffinet, C. Patrat, Y. Fulla, Y. Janssens, and J.-R. Zorn
Percentile curves of serum estradiol levels during controlled ovarian stimulation in 905 cycles stimulated with recombinant FSH show that high estradiol is not detrimental to IVF outcome
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2846 - 2850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.