Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Salim, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shalev, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Salim, R.
Right arrow Articles by Shalev, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 2, 337-340, February 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Bacterial colonization of the uterine cervix and success rate in assisted reproduction: results of a prospective survey

Raed Salim1, Izhar Ben-Shlomo1,3,4, Raul Colodner2, Yoram Keness and Eliezer Shalev1,3

1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2 Laboratory for Microbiology, Ha'Emek Medical Center, Afula and 3 Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

BACKGROUND: Overgrowth of bacteria in the birth canal is associated with an increased risk of late miscarriage, preterm labour, post-partum endometritis and low birthweight. Conception rates in assisted reproduction treatments (ART) remain frustratingly low. We examined whether the nature of bacterial flora, found in the uterine cervical canal at embryo transfer, is associated with the rate of conception in ART. METHODS: We sampled for bacteriological culture the cervical canal of 204 patients who underwent embryo transfer. Of these, 139 (68%) were of fresh embryos, following recent vaginal oocyte retrieval and prophylactic antibiotic therapy, and 65 (32%) of frozen–thawed embryos, without any vaginal intervention in the preceding days. Bacteriological work-up included identification, colony count and antibiotic susceptibility profile. Conception was correlated with bacterial type and colony count. RESULTS: In 75 patients (36.8%) sterile cervical cultures or lactobacillus were recorded. Of these 75 patients, 23 (30.7%) conceived, whereas among the 129 in whom any pathogenic micro-organism was recovered only 21 (16.3%) conceived (P = 0.002). No difference in colonization was found between women who underwent frozen–thawed versus fresh embryo transfer (57 and 67% respectively). Any Gram-negative colonization was associated with no conception. All Gram-positive, and 90% of the Gram-negative bacteria, were sensitive to augmentin. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to conceive in ART is significantly associated with bacterial colonization of the uterine cervix.

Key words: antibiotic susceptibility/assisted reproduction technology/bacterial colonization/embryo transfer/uterine cervix

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ha'Emek Medical Centre, Afula 18101, Israel. E-mail: ibs{at}clalit.org.il

Submitted on November 24, 2000; resubmitted on May 4, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
N. Brook, Y. Khalaf, A. Coomarasamy, J. Edgeworth, and P. Braude
A randomized controlled trial of prophylactic antibiotics (co-amoxiclav) prior to embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2006; 21(11): 2911 - 2915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.