Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF ) Freely available
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coroleu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coroleu, B.
Right arrow Articles by Balasch, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Human Reproduction, Vol. 17, No. 2, 341-346, February 2002
© 2002 European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study

Buenaventura Coroleu1,3, Pedro N. Barri1, Olga Carreras1, Francisca Martínez1, Mónica Parriego1, Lourdes Hereter1, Nuria Parera1, Anna Veiga1 and Juan Balasch2

1 Service of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona and 2 Institut Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine–University of Barcelona, Hospital Clinic–Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, embryo transfer after IVF has been performed blindly and placing the embryos ~1 cm below the fundal endometrial surface. However, it has been suggested that transferring embryos rather lower in the uterine cavity or high in the uterus may improve implantation rates. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a controlled trial to prove this theory. This prospective randomized study investigates the influence of the depth of embryo replacement on the implantation rate after embryo transfer carried out under transabdominal ultrasound guidance. METHODS: A total of 180 consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer were randomized to three study groups according to the distance between the tip of the catheter and the uterine fundus at the moment of the embryo deposition in the lumen of the endometrial cavity: group 1: 10 ± 1.5 mm; group 2: 15 ± 1.5 mm; group 3: 20 ± 1.5 mm. RESULTS: There was equal distribution between all three study groups regarding the main demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients, ovarian response, oocyte retrieval and IVF outcome, as well as the characteristics of embryo transfer and luteal phase support. The position of the catheter tip in relation to the fundal endometrial surface in groups 1 (10.2 ± 0.9 mm), 2 (14.6 ± 0.7 mm) and 3 (19.3 ± 0.8 mm) was significantly different. Implantation rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in groups 2 (31.3%) and 3 (33.3%) compared with group 1 (20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The depth of the embryo replacement into the uterine cavity may influence implantation rates, and thus it should be considered as an additional procedure among factors recently proposed as associated with successful embryo transfer after IVF.

Key words: embryo transfer/implantation rates/IVF/ultrasound-guided embryo transfer

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Institut Universitari Dexeus, Pso Bonanova 67, 08017 Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: vencor{at}iudexeus.uab.es

Submitted on May 30, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Luke and M. B. Brown
Elevated risks of pregnancy complications and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1264 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
I.P. Kosmas, R. Janssens, L. De Munck, H. Al Turki, J. Van der Elst, H. Tournaye, and P. Devroey
Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial
Hum. Reprod., May 1, 2007; 22(5): 1327 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Dias, R. McNamee, and A. Vail
Evidence of improving quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in subfertility
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2617 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. B. Romundstad, P. R. Romundstad, A. Sunde, V. von During, R. Skjaerven, and L. J. Vatten
Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2006; 21(9): 2353 - 2358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, I. Belil, R. Buxaderas, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch
Effect of using an echogenic catheter for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer in an IVF programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled study
Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2006; 21(7): 1809 - 1815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. I. Shamonki, G. L. Schattman, S. D. Spandorfer, P. H. Chung, and Z. Rosenwaks
Ultrasound-guided trial transfer may be beneficial in preparation for an IVF cycle
Hum. Reprod., October 1, 2005; 20(10): 2844 - 2849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. I. Shamonki, S. D. Spandorfer, and Z. Rosenwaks
Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer and the accuracy of trial embryo transfer
Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 20(3): 709 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
R. Matorras, R. Mendoza, A. Exposito, and F.J. Rodriguez-Escudero
Influence of the time interval between embryo catheter loading and discharging on the success of IVF
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2027 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J.G. Franco Jr, A.M.V.C. Martins, R.L.R. Baruffi, A.L. Mauri, C.G. Petersen, V. Felipe, P. Contart, A. Pontes, and J.B.A. Oliveira
Best site for embryo transfer: the upper or lower half of endometrial cavity?
Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2004; 19(8): 1785 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M.M.C. van de Pas, S. Weima, C.W.N. Looman, and F.J.M. Broekmans
The use of fixed distance embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI equalizes the success rates among physicians
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 774 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
E. V. Mocanu
The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 889 - 889.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Coroleu
The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study
Hum. Reprod., April 1, 2003; 18(4): 889 - 890.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
B. Coroleu, P. N. Barri, O. Carreras, F. Martinez, A. Veiga, and J. Balasch
The usefulness of ultrasound guidance in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective randomized clinical trial
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2002; 17(11): 2885 - 2890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.